Karen A Lawrence1, Monica M Matthieu2, Emma Robertson-Blackmore3. 1. 1College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 2. 2College for Public Health and Social Justice, School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri. 3. 3Graduate Medical Education, Halifax Health, Daytona Beach, Florida.
Abstract
Background: Women veterans experience significant morbidity with poorer health and mental health outcomes relative to nonveteran counterparts. Little is known about how to best promote health and well-being among reintegrating female veterans. Civic service has been shown to improve mental health in civilians, but its impact on female veterans is unknown. This study characterizes the physical and mental health and psychosocial functioning of female veterans and evaluates changes in these domains following completion of an intensive civic service program. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from an observational, pre-post cohort study of post-9/11/01 era veterans who completed a 6-month, 20-hour per week civic service program. Of the 346 participants, 107 were women. Participants completed online pre- and post-program surveys. Nine measures of health, mental health, and psychosocial functioning were analyzed. Results: Before starting the program, 47% of women screened positive for a probable diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 24% for depression, and 51% reported seeking assistance for mental health problems. Pre-post change scores indicated significant improvements on nine measures of health, mental health, and psychosocial functioning (p < 0.05). Perceived self-efficacy change scores predicted PTSD change scores, F(1, 93) = 8.00, p < 0.05. Seeking professional assistance for mental health problems and social isolation and loneliness change scores predicted depression change scores, F(2, 95) = 15.618, p < 0.05, explaining 23% of the variance. Conclusions: Civic service has the potential to promote and support the maintenance of psychosocial well-being for returning post-9/11/01 era women veterans with symptoms of PTSD or depression.
Background: Women veterans experience significant morbidity with poorer health and mental health outcomes relative to nonveteran counterparts. Little is known about how to best promote health and well-being among reintegrating female veterans. Civic service has been shown to improve mental health in civilians, but its impact on female veterans is unknown. This study characterizes the physical and mental health and psychosocial functioning of female veterans and evaluates changes in these domains following completion of an intensive civic service program. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from an observational, pre-post cohort study of post-9/11/01 era veterans who completed a 6-month, 20-hour per week civic service program. Of the 346 participants, 107 were women. Participants completed online pre- and post-program surveys. Nine measures of health, mental health, and psychosocial functioning were analyzed. Results: Before starting the program, 47% of women screened positive for a probable diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 24% for depression, and 51% reported seeking assistance for mental health problems. Pre-post change scores indicated significant improvements on nine measures of health, mental health, and psychosocial functioning (p < 0.05). Perceived self-efficacy change scores predicted PTSD change scores, F(1, 93) = 8.00, p < 0.05. Seeking professional assistance for mental health problems and social isolation and loneliness change scores predicted depression change scores, F(2, 95) = 15.618, p < 0.05, explaining 23% of the variance. Conclusions: Civic service has the potential to promote and support the maintenance of psychosocial well-being for returning post-9/11/01 era women veterans with symptoms of PTSD or depression.
Entities:
Keywords:
PTSD; depressive symptoms; mental health; psychosocial support systems; veterans; women's health
Authors: Keren Lehavot; Katherine D Hoerster; Karin M Nelson; Matthew Jakupcak; Tracy L Simpson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Erin L Merz; Scott C Roesch; Vanessa L Malcarne; Frank J Penedo; Maria M Llabre; Orit B Weitzman; Elena L Navas-Nacher; Krista M Perreira; Franklyn Gonzalez; Liliana A Ponguta; Timothy P Johnson; Linda C Gallo Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2013-12-09
Authors: Megan R Gerber; Matthew W King; Katherine M Iverson; Suzanne L Pineles; Sally G Haskell Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Caroline E Jenkinson; Andy P Dickens; Kerry Jones; Jo Thompson-Coon; Rod S Taylor; Morwenna Rogers; Clare L Bambra; Iain Lang; Suzanne H Richards Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Richard E Adams; Yirui Hu; Charles R Figley; Thomas G Urosevich; Stuart N Hoffman; H Lester Kirchner; Ryan J Dugan; Joseph J Boscarino; Carrie A Withey; Joseph A Boscarino Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Richard D Gettings; Jenna Kirtley; Gemma Wilson-Menzfeld; Gavin E Oxburgh; Derek Farrell; Matthew D Kiernan Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-07-08