Rebecka Dücker1,2, Peter Zöllner2, Peter Lümmen2, Susanne Ries2, Alberto Collavo2, Roland Beffa2. 1. Department of Crop Sciences, Division of General Plant Pathology and Crop Protection, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 2. Bayer AG, Crop Science Division, Industrial Park Höchst, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Herbicides inhibiting the synthesis of very long-chain fatty acids (HRAC group K3 , WSSA group 15), such as flufenacet, play an important role in weed management strategies, particularly when herbicide resistance to inhibitors with other modes of action, such as acetolactate synthase or acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase), has already evolved. So far, only a few cases of resistance towards inhibitors of the synthesis of very long-chain fatty acids have been described. In this study, we characterized the level of flufenacet resistance in several Lolium spp. field populations and investigated the resistance mechanism. RESULTS: The screening for flufenacet resistance revealed the ability of Lolium spp. populations from several continents to survive flufenacet treatments at and above the field rate. This study demonstrates the way in which flufenacet is detoxified in resistant weed populations. Glutathione was found to be conjugated to flufenacet in Lolium spp. seedlings, and there was evidence that glutathione transferase activity was enhanced in protein extracts from flufenacet-resistant seedlings. A significant correlation was found between the resistance factor obtained by biotests and the degradation half-time of flufenacet in ryegrass plants obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). CONCLUSION: At present, flufenacet resistance is not widespread; however, in certain Lolium spp. populations resistance levels could reach agronomic relevance due to detoxification by glutathione transferases. In Europe especially, only a few herbicide modes of action are registered for the control of Lolium spp. and therefore it is becoming increasingly important to apply best management practices to prevent the spread of flufenacet resistance.
BACKGROUND: Herbicides inhibiting the synthesis of very long-chain fatty acids (HRAC group K3 , WSSA group 15), such as flufenacet, play an important role in weed management strategies, particularly when herbicide resistance to inhibitors with other modes of action, such as acetolactate synthase or acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase), has already evolved. So far, only a few cases of resistance towards inhibitors of the synthesis of very long-chain fatty acids have been described. In this study, we characterized the level of flufenacet resistance in several Lolium spp. field populations and investigated the resistance mechanism. RESULTS: The screening for flufenacet resistance revealed the ability of Lolium spp. populations from several continents to survive flufenacet treatments at and above the field rate. This study demonstrates the way in which flufenacet is detoxified in resistant weed populations. Glutathione was found to be conjugated to flufenacet in Lolium spp. seedlings, and there was evidence that glutathione transferase activity was enhanced in protein extracts from flufenacet-resistant seedlings. A significant correlation was found between the resistance factor obtained by biotests and the degradation half-time of flufenacet in ryegrass plants obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). CONCLUSION: At present, flufenacet resistance is not widespread; however, in certain Lolium spp. populations resistance levels could reach agronomic relevance due to detoxification by glutathione transferases. In Europe especially, only a few herbicide modes of action are registered for the control of Lolium spp. and therefore it is becoming increasingly important to apply best management practices to prevent the spread of flufenacet resistance.
Authors: Todd A Gaines; Stephen O Duke; Sarah Morran; Carlos A G Rigon; Patrick J Tranel; Anita Küpper; Franck E Dayan Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Andréia K Suzukawa; Lucas K Bobadilla; Carol Mallory-Smith; Caio A C G Brunharo Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Seth A Strom; Aaron G Hager; Jeanaflor Crystal T Concepcion; Nicholas J Seiter; Adam S Davis; James A Morris; Shiv S Kaundun; Dean E Riechers Journal: Plant Cell Physiol Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 4.927
Authors: David Comont; Dana R MacGregor; Laura Crook; Richard Hull; Lieselot Nguyen; Robert P Freckleton; Dylan Z Childs; Paul Neve Journal: Pest Manag Sci Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.462
Authors: Joel Torra; José María Montull; Andreu Taberner; Nawaporn Onkokesung; Neil Boonham; Robert Edwards Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 5.753