Literature DB >> 30919682

Accuracy of Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Patients With Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome in a Tertiary Referral Centre.

Pierrick Henneton1,2, Juliette Albuisson1,3,4, Salma Adham1,4, Anne Legrand1,3,4, Jean Michael Mazzella1, Xavier Jeunemaitre1,3,4, Michael Frank1,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a rare inherited connective tissue disease secondary to mutations within the COL3A1 gene. The diagnosis of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is challenging, and patient selection for genetic testing relies on diagnostic criteria, which have never been evaluated.
METHODS: All patients seen at a dedicated tertiary referral center for a suspicion of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome between January 2001 and March 2016 were retrospectively included in a diagnostic accuracy study. Major and minor diagnostic criteria of the Villefranche classification were tested for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, according to results of genetic testing.
RESULTS: N=519 patients were eligible for analysis dividing into n=384 probands and n=135 relatives. A pathogenic COL3A1 variant was identified in n=165 (31.8%) patients. The Villefranche criteria were met for n=248 patients with a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI, 0.72-0.85) and a negative predictive value of 87% (95% CI, 0.83-0.91). Diagnostic accuracy was highest for symptomatic probands (sensitivity 92%; negative predictive value 95%) with limited specificity (60%). Probands ≤25 years had the worst diagnostic performance. The revised diagnostic Criteria (2017) were less accurate than the Villefranche classification (overall diagnostic odds-ratio, 4.17 versus 7.8; probands diagnostic odds-ratio, 4.04 versus 18.1; and probands ≤25 years diagnostic odds-ratio, 2.36 versus 5.1) mainly due to a lack of sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: The Villefranche criteria provide accurate detection of symptomatic probands in specialized practice but have limited specificity. The revised diagnostic criteria for vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome have increased specificity, but its overall performance is poorer. The early clinical diagnosis of probands without family history is not addressed by both diagnostic classifications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; diagnosis; genetic testing; patient selection; vascular disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30919682     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.001996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med        ISSN: 2574-8300


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic approach and management of genetic aortopathies.

Authors:  Rohan Bhandari; Rajani D Aatre; Yogendra Kanthi
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  Actionable Genomics in Clinical Practice: Paradigmatic Case Reports of Clinical and Therapeutic Strategies Based upon Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Merlin G Butler; Daniel Moreno-De-Luca; Antonio M Persico
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, an often unrecognized clinical entity: a case report of a novel mutation in the COL3A1 gene.

Authors:  Sanda Huljev Frković; Ana Marija Slišković; Mia Toivonen; Andrea Crkvenac Gregore; Ana Šutalo; Majda Vrkić Kirhmajer
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.415

4.  A novel mutation in COL3A1 associates to vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with predominant musculoskeletal involvement.

Authors:  Federica Ruscitti; Lucia Trevisan; Giulia Rosti; Fabio Gotta; Annalia Cianflone; Alessandro Geroldi; Paola Origone; Anna Pichiecchio; Simona Viglio; Maria Iascone; Paola Mandich
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.183

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.