| Literature DB >> 30918683 |
Johanne Lind1, Marianne Mahler2.
Abstract
AIM: To describe and interpret how older adults who have returned home to recover from a hip fracture cope with life in a health promoting perspective.Entities:
Keywords: coping; empowerment; health promotion; hip fracture; literature review; mixed methods review; nurses; older adults; recovery; self‐efficacy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30918683 PMCID: PMC6419295 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Open ISSN: 2054-1058
Figure 1Flow diagram of the data search
Qualitative studies included in the review
|
Author (year) | Aim of the study | Design, sample, response rate, setting | Data analysis, outcomes, instruments | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Archibald ( | Reveal participants´ experiences in order to gain insights into how to improve the nursing care of people after hip fracture |
In‐depth interviews. Open‐ended, unstructured approach | Phenomenological approach |
4 main themes: Hopeless and helpless, fear Most participants could remember pain at time of injury but focused on how they managed Motivation, a key factor in the recovery Being housebound, acceptance of new situation |
|
Huang et al. ( |
Explore |
Observation and semi‐structured interviews. Open‐ended questions |
Content analysis and NVIVO 6.0 software to group words into categories. Key concepts and variables identified as initial codes by deduction from related articles about ageism and defined each category |
*Perceived ageism: |
|
Huang and Acton ( | Explore the ways in which elders who have experienced a hip fracture maintain their independence |
Qualitative interviews. One open‐ended question to explore the topic of hip fracture and independence in depth. A questionnaire regarding demographic data | Phenomenological approach. Content analysis. Categories that represented interpretations about ways to maintain independence were identified. Data collection and analysis were simultaneous and iterative |
195 statements and 3 major themes exemplified how independence was maintained: |
|
Robinson ( | Identify factors that promote function and enable a successful transition to home for elderly women who are recovering from hip fracture |
Focus group interviews. Groups of 7, 5 and 3 participants | Grounded Theory approach. Open coding to conceptualize data and axial coding to assemble data and make connections between category and its subcategories |
Function‐inhibiting factors
Physical discomfort Feeling limited Bending precautions Need for assistive devices Loss of enabling skills Viewing age as strength Looking ahead—motivation Confronting head‐on—determination, Minimizing problems Seeing humour in frustration Faith—trust in God Recognizing progress Making adaptations for ADLs Accepting help Thankfulness Pride in conquering |
|
Shawler ( | Describe the concept of Becoming Empowered—a concept in a theoretical framework for transitions in mother–daughter relationships during health crisis |
Semi‐structured interviews |
Grounded Theory approach |
A theoretical model, The Evolutionary Empowerment‐Strength Model about the transitions experienced by the mothers and daughters was developed Mothers and daughters demonstrated mental strength to persevere and withstand fearful experiences, served as exemplars to others and grew from challenging and fearful times Sharing specific ideas about how to strengthen oneself during and after a crisis, a sense of self‐confidence. Offered empowerment in decision‐making and seeking information. Offered advice about physical activity, shared ideas and beliefs in divine power and their life philosophies |
|
Shawler ( | Discover the individual women's perspectives of their relationships over time while going through a health crisis |
Semi‐structured interviews |
Grounded Theory approach |
Evolution of Women's Strength. It answers the question of what basic social psychological process helps the women move through the health crisis |
|
Young and Resnick ( | Determine why some hip fracture survivors return to their pre‐fracture function and others do not, this article explores factors associated with functional recovery from the patient's perspective |
A thematic interview with open‐ended questions exploring areas influencing functional recovery and participants’ willingness to engage in rehabilitation activities |
Content analysis. Interview guide. The analysis was consistent with in vivo coding |
Facilitators of the recovery
Professional care Social support and spirituality Determination Lifestyle factors and environment Identifying goals Medical complications/comorbidities Unpleasant sensations (pain) Increase the amount of care provided Spirituality/Social support Participate and listen to healthcare providers Determination and a positive attitude Be careful Relieve pain or work through pain |
|
Zidén et al. ( | Explore and describe the experienced consequences of an acute hip fracture among home‐dwelling elderly people shortly after discharge from hospital |
Qualitative interviews. The participants narrated their experiences |
Analysed according to the phenomenographic method |
*In relation to your body and to yourself:
Limited to move and lost confidence in body Become humble and grateful Respect yourself and your own needs Become more dependent on others Gain more human contact and are treated in a friendly way by others Secluded and trapped at home You are old, closer to death and Have lost your zest for life You take one day at a time and are uncertain about the future |
Quantitative studies included in the review
|
Authors (year) | Aim of the study | Design, sample, response rate, setting | Data analysis, outcomes, instruments | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Casado et al. ( | Hypothesized that social support for exercise from experts ( |
Prospective, descriptive study. Secondary analysis of data from a RCT study |
Comparisons between groups | The Social Support for Exercise Habits Experts Scale (SSEH‐E) increased over time in all groups. Statistically significant increase in social support for exercise between participants in the control versus any of the treatment groups. Those who were exercising with a trainer and receiving the motivational Plus component had stronger social support for exercise and outcome expectations for exercise |
|
Fortinsky et al. ( | Test the hypothesis that hospitalized hip fracture patients with greater reported self‐efficacy for conducting rehabilitation therapy would have a greater likelihood of recovering to pre‐fracture levels physical function 6 months after the fracture |
A prospective cohort design |
Descriptive statistics to inspect the distribution of responses to eight rehabilitation therapy self‐efficacy items |
Results showed that patients with higher self‐efficacy scores had a greater likelihood of locomotion recovery, controlling for pre‐fracture locomotion function level |
|
Johansson et al. ( | Explore the predictive power of SOC in patients with hip fractures in reference to length of hospital stay, pre‐ and postoperative state of confusion, health, functional ability, quality of life, and need for help after discharge form hospital |
A non‐randomized intervention study |
Dichotomizing the SOC subgroups, means and proportions between the high and low SOC |
One month after discharge: persons with stronger SOC—more had returned home, less help from the municipality, expressed less disability and fewer experiences of discomfort regarding emotional status |
|
Pakkala et al. ( | Describe the effects of intensive resistance training on SOC among older adults after hip fracture |
Secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial. Design and method published previously (Portegijs et al. |
Antonovsky´ s. 13‐item scale |
Intensive 12‐week strength‐power training had no significant effect on participants' SOC level |
|
Portegijs et al. ( |
Determine the relationship between SOC and |
Secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial. Design and method published previously (Portegijs et al. |
SOC Antonovsky’ s short 13‐item scale |
SOC was significant associated with adherence |
|
Roberto ( | Investigate the nature of strategies used by older women to cope with their hip fractures |
Cross‐sectional study |
*Personal variables: Chronic illnesses and tasks of daily living (OARS), cognitive functioning, locus of control orientation (Locus of control Scale) and network size |
Seeking social support was the most common strategy |
|
Shaw et al. ( | Assess the relationship between health locus of control and outcome in older women who had undergone surgery for fractured neck of femur |
Descriptive questionnaire survey |
To assess psychological distress, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used |
Increase in measures between 5 days and 30 days follow‐up in depression, levels of disability and a little in anxiety |
|
Zidén et al. ( | Describe the long‐term effects of a home rehabilitation programme in elderly people with hip fracture compared with conventional care regarding independence in daily activities, balance confidence, frequency of daily activities, physical functioning, HRQoL and perceived recovery |
A randomized controlled trial. Geriatric hospital‐based home rehabilitation was compared with conventional care |
Independence in activities of daily living (FIM) |
12 months post‐discharge the HR participants reported significantly higher degree of independence in self‐care, locomotion (FIM) and outdoor activities |
Mixed methods study included in the review
|
Authors (year) | Aim of the study | Design, sample, response rate | Data analysis, outcomes, instruments | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Borkan et al. ( |
Examine |
Individual, in‐depth interviews during the initial hospital admission, field notes, a functional status questionnaire, follow‐up interviews at 3 and 6 months post‐hip fracture in the participants homes or by telephone on request |
Qualitative narrative and quantitative analysis |
The relationship between narrative analysis and outcomes—the actual outcomes for analysis were change in ambulation from pre‐fracture level to 3 and 6 months post‐fracture (ADL scale) |
Appraisal of the qualitative studies in the review inspired by Lincoln and Guba (1985)
| Archibald ( | Huang et al. ( | Huang and Acton (2014) | Robinson ( | Shawler ( | Shawler ( | Young and Resnick ( | Zidén et al. ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credibility |
X | X | X | X |
X | X | X | X | |
| Transferability | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Dependability | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Confirmability | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Data saturation | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Ethical considerations | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
In all included studies, researchers did reflections on credibility (e.g., intern validity, guidance by an experienced researcher), transferability (e.g., external validity, strategic sampling), dependability (e.g., reliability, the process of the research is logical, traceable and clearly documented), confirmability (e.g., transparence, findings are clearly derived from the data, discussed pre‐understanding), and they all showed ethical considerations. Four studies observed data saturation.
Validity of the quantitative studies and the mixed methods study in the review inspired by Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP)
| Casado et al. ( | Fortinsky et al. ( | Johansson et al. ( | Pakkala et al. ( | Portegijs et al. ( | Roberto ( | Shaw et al. ( | Zidén et al. ( | Borkan et al. ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Sample | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Analysis | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Bias discussed | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Confounder | Well educated, Caucasian females, not accounted for participants former behaviour | Small sample size only about half fulfilled the study, younger, more independent | X | Small sample size, healthy and young participants, relatively high SOC |
Small sample size, | X |
Participants made a retrospective judgement of pre‐fracture status, measure | Participants in the conventional care group were older, more males, had more help at home. The intervention group had early start in rehabilitation, 44 participants were excluded after randomization | X |
| Randomization | Explained in a former study | Not relevant | Not relevant | Secondary analysis of RCT | Published previously | Not relevant | Not relevant | X | Not relevant |
| Ethical considerations | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |