| Literature DB >> 30918657 |
Mahmuda Bilkis Bintee Alam1, Abdullah Ibne Omar1,2, Md Omar Faruque3, David Russell Notter4, Kathiravan Periasamy5, Md Motahar Hussain Mondal6, Md Jalal Uddin Sarder7, Md Shamsuddin5, Jianhua Cao1, Xiaoyong Du8, Zhenyang Wu1,9, Shuhong Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Haemonchosis is a major economic problem in goat production in humid, tropical and subtropical regions. The disease is caused by an abomasal nematode, Haemonchus contortus, which is highly pathogenic in small ruminants. The aim of this study was to identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) that were associated with fecal egg counts (FEC) and could be used as markers to identify resistance to H. contortus in goats.Entities:
Keywords: Fecal egg count; Goat; Haemonchus contortus; Parasite resistance; SNP markers
Year: 2019 PMID: 30918657 PMCID: PMC6419443 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-019-0327-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Least-square means and standard errors for log-transformed fecal egg count, body weight, and packed cell volume for goats exposed to natural infection with H. contortus in China and Bangladesh
| Main effect | Class | No. | LFEC (log10) | Body weight, kg | PCV, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | Max. | Mean ± SE | Range | Mean ± SE | Range | |||
| China | ||||||||
| Location | Yichang | 182 | 2.34 ± 0.05a | 15,600 | 26.13 ± 0.2.3 | 6 to 33 | 17.08 ± 0.48 | 17 to 35 |
| Enshi | 98 | 2.45 ± 0.06b | 9400 | 25.83 ± 0.32 | 8 to 36 | 17.68 ± 0.66 | 17 to 33 | |
| ns | ns | ns | ||||||
| Breed | YCW | 32 | 2.25 ± 0.11a | 2400 | 26.15 ± 0.57 | 6 to 28 | 18.72 ± 0.98b | 18 to 33 |
| NJY | 56 | 2.08 ± 0.08b | 5400 | 25.92 ± 0.42 | 6 to 32 | 17.96 ± 0.86c | 17 to 32 | |
| ESB | 37 | 2.53 ± 0.10a | 3600 | 26.27 ± 0.52 | 9 to 36 | 20.35 ± 0.99a | 18 to 33 | |
| Chinese crossbred | 155 | 2.48 ± 0.05c | 15,600 | 25.83 ± 0.25 | 6 to 33 | 17.99 ± 0.52c | 18 to 35 | |
| *** | ns | * | ||||||
| Bangladesh | ||||||||
| Breed | BBG | 227 | 1.58 ± 0.04 | 400 | 26.53 ± 0.21 | 6 to 35 | 20.16 ± 0.43 | 18 to 35 |
| China & Bangladesh | ||||||||
| Sex | Male | 151 | 2.09 ± 0.04a | 15,600 | 26.30 ± 0.17 | 6 to 36 | 17.55 ± 0.37 | 17 to 35 |
| Female | 356 | 1.86 ± 0.06b | 7200 | 26.14 ± 0.26 | 6 to 35 | 17.39 ± 0.56 | 17 to 32 | |
| ** | ns | ns | ||||||
Goats from China and Bangladesh differed (P < 0.001) for LFEC and PCV but not body weight
Fecal egg counts (FEC) were transformed as LFEC = log10 [(FEC + 25)]
SE standard error, PCV packed cell volume, YCW Yichang White, NJY Nanjiang Yellow, ESB Enshi Black, BBG Black Bengal Goat
Significance levels for each main effect and measured variable are shown on the line following the last main effect class. ***: P < 0.001; **: P < 0.01; ns: not significant
a, b, cMeans within a country designation and main effect with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05)
Candidate genes and descriptions of SNP
| Gene | SNP | Nucleotide | Chromosome No. | Amino acid | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Alleles | Encode | Region | |||
|
| 9473550 | C/T | 25 | R > C | Coding | |
|
| 9473870 | A/T | 25 | D > E | Coding | |
|
| 48655334 | A/G | 15 | – | Intron8–9 | |
|
| 48655374 | A/G | 15 | – | Intron8–9 | |
|
| 56567955 | G/C | 5 | – | Intron5–6 | |
|
| 41961106 | A/G | 19 | – | 3’UTR | |
|
| 2421828 | C/T | 15 | – | Intron6–7 | |
|
| 2422132 | G/T | 15 | – | Intron5–6 | |
|
| 24358932 | A/G | 19 | – | 3’UTR | |
|
| 24358402 | A/C | 19 | – | 3’UTR | |
Amino acid symbols: R = Arginine, C = Cysteine, D = Aspartic acid, E = Glutamic acid
Genotypic and allelic frequencies for each SNP in total population of goats
| SNP | Genotypic frequencies | Allele frequencies | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CT | TT | C | 0.99 | |
| 0.98 | 0.02 | 0.002 | T | 0.01 | |
| AA | AT | TT | A | 0.01 | |
| 0.004 | 0.02 | 0.98 | T | 0.99 | |
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.18 | |
| 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.69 | G | 0.82 | |
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.80 | |
| 0.65 | 0.27 | 0.04 | G | 0.20 | |
| GG | GC | CC | C | 0.14 | |
| 0.75 | 0.22 | 0.03 | G | 0.86 | |
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.52 | |
| 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.26 | G | 0.48 | |
| CC | CT | TT | C | 0.76 | |
| 0.58 | 0.37 | 0.05 | T | 0.24 | |
| GG | GT | TT | G | 0.74 | |
| 0.58 | 0.37 | 0.05 | T | 0.24 | |
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.27 | |
| 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.57 | G | 0.73 | |
| AA | AC | CC | A | 0.74 | |
| 0.58 | 0.33 | 0.09 | C | 0.26 | |
Genotypic and allelic frequencies and chi-squire tests of HWE genotypic frequencies for each SNP in Chinese and Bangladeshi goats
| SNP | Chinese goats | Bangladeshi goats | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypic frequencies | Allele frequencies | Genotypic frequencies | Allele frequencies | |||||||||
| CC | TC | TT | C | 0.98 | 0.006 | CC | TC | TT | C | 1.00 | 0.0001 | |
| 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.01 | T | 0.02 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T | 0.00 | |||
| AA | AT | TT | A | 0.02 | 0.006 | AA | AT | TT | A | 0.01 | 0.0001 | |
| 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.97 | T | 0.98 | 0.004 | 0..004 | 0.99 | T | 0.99 | |||
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.19 | 0.034 | AA | AG | GG | A | 0.16 | 0.61 | |
| 0.05 | 0.26 | 0.69 | G | 0.81 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.70 | G | 0.84 | |||
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.80 | 0.04 | AA | AG | GG | A | 0.83 | 0.17 | |
| 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.05 | G | 0.20 | 0.69 | 0.29 | 0.02 | G | 0.17 | |||
| CC | GC | GG | C | 0.16 | 0.0003 | CC | GC | GG | C | 0.12 | 0.88 | |
| 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.76 | G | 0.84 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.78 | G | 0.88 | |||
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.49 | 0.03 | AA | AG | GG | A | 0.56 | 0.62 | |
| 0.27 | 0.43 | 0.30 | G | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.20 | G | 0.44 | |||
| CC | TC | TT | C | 0.71 | 0.68 | CC | TC | TT | C | 0.83 | 0.09 | |
| 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.08 | T | 0.29 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 0.01 | T | 0.17 | |||
| GG | GT | TT | G | 0.76 | 0.66 | GG | GT | TT | G | 0.84 | 0.09 | |
| 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.08 | T | 0.24 | 0.67 | 0.31 | 0.02 | T | 0.16 | |||
| AA | AG | GG | A | 0.38 | 0.62 | AA | AG | GG | A | 0.13 | 0.0001 | |
| 0.16 | 0.44 | 0.40 | G | 0.62 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.79 | G | 0.87 | |||
| AA | AC | CC | A | 0.63 | 0.45 | AA | AC | CC | A | 0.89 | 0.83 | |
| 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.15 | C | 0.37 | 0.80 | 0.19 | 0.01 | C | 0.11 | |||
HWE Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, Chi-squire
Heterozygosity (He), effective allele number (Ne), and polymorphism information content (PIC) for each SNP and breed
| SNP | Parameter | Goat breeds | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YCW 32 | NJY 56 | ESB | CCB | BBG | ||
|
| 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | |
|
| 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | |
|
| 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
|
| 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.01 | |
|
| 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
|
| 0.19 | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.27 | |
|
| 1.23 | 1.46 | 1.11 | 1.55 | 1.38 | |
|
| 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.24 | |
|
| 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.29 | |
|
| 1.20 | 1.46 | 1.12 | 1.56 | 1.40 | |
|
| 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.1 | 0.29 | 0.25 | |
|
| 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.21 | |
|
| 1.52 | 1.20 | 1.18 | 1.44 | 1.26 | |
|
| 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.19 | |
|
| 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | |
|
| 2.00 | 1.92 | 1.96 | 2.00 | 1.97 | |
|
| 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.37 | |
|
| 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.28 | |
|
| 1.82 | 1.65 | 1.68 | 1.69 | 1.39 | |
|
| 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.24 | |
|
| 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.28 | |
|
| 1.82 | 1.66 | 1.68 | 1.69 | 1.39 | |
|
| 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.24 | |
|
| 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.23 | |
|
| 1.79 | 1.96 | 1.98 | 1.86 | 1.30 | |
|
| 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.21 | |
|
| 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.19 | |
|
| 1.79 | 1.96 | 1.98 | 1.83 | 1.24 | |
|
| 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.18 | |
Numbers of goats in each breed are shown in parentheses under the breed designation
YCW Yichang White, NJY Nanjiang Yellow, ESB Enshi Black, CCB Chinese crossbred, BBG Black Bengal Goat
Associations between SNP and fecal egg counts
| Gene | SNP | Genotype | Association | Multiple comparison test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | ||||||||
|
| CC | CT | TT | 0.039* | TC-CC | TT-CC | TT-TC | |
| 494 | 9 | 1 | 0.046* | 0.828 | 0.977 | |||
| AA | AT | TT | 0.037* | AT-AA | TT-AA | TT-AT | ||
| 2 | 8 | 495 | 0.977 | 0.822 | 0.043* | |||
|
| AA | AG | GG | 0.014** | AG-AA | GG-AA | GG-AG | |
| 20 | 138 | 348 | 0.097 | 0.547 | 0.031* | |||
| AA | AG | GG | 0.014** | AG-AA | GG-AA | GG-AG | ||
| 344 | 138 | 20 | 0.031* | 0.552 | 0.098 | |||
|
| GG | GC | CC | 0.024* | GC-CC | GG-CC | GG-GC | |
| 381 | 107 | 17 | 0.029* | 0.132 | 0.202 | |||
|
| AA | AG | GG | 0.021* | AG-AA | GG-AA | GG-AG | |
| 144 | 224 | 127 | 0.849 | 0.129 | 0.023* | |||
|
| CC | TC | TT | 0.003** | TC-CC | TT-CC | TT-TC | |
| 292 | 189 | 25 | 0.998 | 0.003** | 0.004** | |||
| GG | GT | TT | 0.003** | GT-GG | TT-GG | TT-GT | ||
| 291 | 189 | 25 | 0.998 | 0.002** | 0.005** | |||
|
| AA | AG | GG | 0.044* | AG-AA | GG-AA | GG-AG | |
| 59 | 155 | 290 | 0.102 | 0.038* | 0.925 | |||
| AA | AC | CC | 0.009** | AC-AA | CC-AA | CC-AC | ||
| 289 | 167 | 45 | 0.886 | 0.012** | 0.037* | |||
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
Least-squares means for FEC, PCV and BW of each SNP genotypes in all goats
| SNPs ID | Genotype |
| All goats | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEC | PCV, % | BW, kg | |||
| CC | 494 | 2.00 ± 0.08a | 26.26 ± 0.21 | 14.45 ± 0.97 | |
| TC | 9 | 3.05 ± 0.09b | 25.83 ± 0.34 | 15.89 ± 6.84 | |
| TT | 1 | 3.08 ± 0.23ab | 24.00 ± 0.00 | 27.00 ± 0.00 | |
| AA | 2 | 3.09 ± 0.14ab | 24.00 ± 0.38 | 27.00 ± 0.77 | |
| AT | 8 | 3.06 ± 0.07b | 25.83 ± 0.25 | 15.89 ± 0.84 | |
| TT | 495 | 2.00 ± 0.09a | 26.27 ± 0.21 | 14.46 ± 0.96 | |
| AA | 20 | 2.42 ± 0.15b | 26.45 ± 0.22 | 16.87 ± 0.43 | |
| AG | 138 | 1.98 ± 0.11a | 26.13 ± 0.33 | 14.13 ± 0.83 | |
| GG | 348 | 2.01 ± 0.08a | 26.28 ± 0.16 | 14.50 ± 1.03 | |
| AA | 344 | 2.01 ± 0.04a | 26.30 ± 0.18 | 14.49 ± 0.06 | |
| AG | 138 | 2.00 ± 0.07a | 26.13 ± 0.33 | 15.13 ± 0.82 | |
| GG | 20 | 2.42 ± 0.15b | 26.45 ± 0.32 | 16.87 ± 0.43 | |
| GG | 381 | 1.97 ± 0.09a | 25.32 ± 0.17 | 14.41 ± 0.94 | |
| GC | 107 | 2.18 ± 0.12b | 26.23 ± 0.37 | 15.40 ± 1.02 | |
| CC | 17 | 2.15 ± 0.15b | 25.32 ± 0.17 | 16.41 ± 0.75 | |
| AA | 144 | 2.00 ± 0.06b | 26.39 ± 0.15 | 14.96 ± 0.25 | |
| AG | 224 | 1.92 ± 0.07a | 26.30 ± 0.17 | 14.36 ± 0.59 | |
| GG | 127 | 2.24 ± 0.08c | 26.09 ± 0.28 | 14.53 ± 0.22 | |
| CC | 292 | 2.01 ± 0.04a | 26.37 ± 0.26 | 14.38 ± 0.14 | |
| TC | 189 | 2.00 ± 0.06a | 26.15 ± 0.16 | 14.72 ± 0.70 | |
| TT | 25 | 2.31 ± 0.14b | 25.66 ± 0.43 | 14.69 ± 0.96 | |
| GG | 291 | 2.01 ± 0.04a | 26.37 ± 0.26 | 14.36 ± 0.12 | |
| GT | 189 | 2.00 ± 0.06a | 26.15 ± 0.16 | 14.72 ± 0.70 | |
| TT | 25 | 2.30 ± 0.14b | 25.66 ± 0.43 | 14.70 ± 0.96 | |
| AA | 59 | 2.20 ± 0.08c | 25.47 ± 0.19 | 16.20 ± 0.03b | |
| AG | 155 | 2.14 ± 0.11b | 26.52 ± 0.25 | 15.06 ± 0.94b | |
| GG | 290 | 1.92 ± 0.10a | 26.30 ± 0.15 | 13.88 ± 0.91a | |
| AA | 289 | 1.93 ± 0.04a | 26.27 ± 0.16 | 13.90 ± 0.93a | |
| AC | 167 | 2.12 ± 0.06b | 26.44 ± 0.14 | 14.75 ± 0.99a | |
| CC | 45 | 2.25 ± 0.11c | 25.61 ± 0.54 | 17.32 ± 0.65b | |
FEC fecal egg count, PCV packed cell volume, BW body weight. FEC were transformed as LFEC = log10(FEC + 25) before analysis
a, b, cMeans within a column and SNP with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05)
Correlation coefficients among FEC, BW and PCV for Chinese and Bangladeshi goats
| Measurement | All goats | Chinese goats | Bangladeshi goats | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW | FEC | BW | FEC | BW | FEC | |
| PCV | −0.40 | −0.47** | −0.28 | −0.45* | 0.31 | −0.44*** |
| BW | 1 | 0.56*** | 1 | 0.66* | 1 | −0.27 |
FEC fecal egg count, PCV packed cell volume, BW body weight
*P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001
Fig. 1Linkage disequilibrium blocks for SNPs in four genes: a HSPA8_1024_A > G and HSPA8_1064_A > G (LD = 98, r2 = 0.98); b CIITA_161_C > T and CIITA_481_A > T (LD = 100, r2 = 1); c SERPING1_312_C > T and SERPING1_615_G > T (LD = 100, r2 = 1); d ATP2A3_150_A > G and ATP2A3_680_A > C (LD = 93, r2 = 0.93)
Associations of haplotype polymorphisms in CIITA, HSPA8, SERPING1, and ATP2A3 with FEC for goat breeds
| Gene | Haplotype | YCW | NJY | ESB | CCB | BBG | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Mean ± SE | No. | (Mean ± SE) | No. | (Mean ± SE) | No. | (Mean ± SE) | No. | (Mean ± SE) | ||
|
| CCTT | 31 | 2.22 ± 0.12 | 55 | 2.06 ± 0.09 | 37 | 2.53 ± 0.09 | 2.44 ± 0.07 | 1.57 ± 0.03 | ||
| TCAT | 1 | 3.15 ± 0.66 | 1 | 3.31 ± 0.73 | – | – | 7 | 3.19 ± 0.30 | – | – | |
| TTAA | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 3.18 ± 0.79 | – | – | |
|
| GGAA | 27 | 2.31 ± 0.13 | 37 | 2.09 ± 0.12b | 32 | 2.59 ± 0.10 | 93 | 2.45 ± 0.08 | 154 | 1.58 ± 0.03 |
| AGAG | 4 | 1.76 ± 0.33 | 16 | 1.87 ± 0.18a | 4 | 2.13 ± 0.29 | 50 | 2.47 ± 0.11 | 64 | 1.56 ± 0.05 | |
| AAGG | 1 | 2.51 ± 0.67 | 3 | 3.00 ± 0.41c | – | 11 | 2.71 ± 0.24 | 5 | 1.54 ± 0.17 | ||
|
| CCGG | 14 | 2.40 ± 0.18 | 30 | 2.05 ± 0.13 | 18 | 2.48 ± 0.14 | 77 | 2.49 ± 0.09a | 152 | 1.57 ± 0.03 |
| TCGT | 14 | 2.13 ± 0.18 | 20 | 2.16 ± 0.17 | 17 | 2.59 ± 0.14 | 67 | 2.37 ± 0.08a | 71 | 1.55 ± 0.04 | |
| TTTT | 4 | 2.14 ± 0.34 | 5 | 2.07 ± 0.34 | 2 | 2.48 ± 0.42 | 11 | 2.98 ± 0.24b | 3 | 2.09 ± 0.21 | |
|
| AGAC | 15 | 2.13 ± 0.18b | 20 | 2.32 ± 0.16b | 15 | 2.56 ± 0.15 | 70 | 2.50 ± 0.09a | 32 | 1.58 ± 0.07 |
| GGAA | 14 | 2.46 ± 0.18c | 22 | 1.83 ± 0.15a | 13 | 2.31 ± 0.16 | 61 | 2.36 ± 0.10a | 178 | 1.59 ± 0.38 | |
| AACC | 3 | 1.89 ± 0.15a | 14 | 2.14 ± 0.19a | 9 | 2.80 ± 0.19 | 15 | 2.89 ± 0.21b | 3 | 1.39 ± 0.21 | |
| AAAC | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 2.97 ± 0.46b | 11 | 1.39 ± 0.11 | |
Numbers of the digit in bracket indicate the number of the individuals in the group
a, b, c Means within a column and breed with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Means for (a) fecal egg count, FEC; b body weight, BWT; c packed cell volume, PCV and d haemoglobin (Hg) level in resistant and susceptible groups of Yichang white goats at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days after artificial challenge with 5000 infective L3 larvae of Haemonchus contortus cultured under in vitro condition. Day 0 was the day of inoculation with the L3 larvae
Fig. 3Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) measurements of gene expression in abomasal tissue of resistant and susceptible goats. (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f): are the relative mRNA expression of Major histocompatibility complex class II molecules (CIITA), heat stress protein 70 (HSPA8), signal transducer activator of transcription 5B (STAT5B), extended synaptotagmin-1 (ESYT1), serpin peptidase inhibitor clade G member 1 (SERPING1), and the endoplasmic Ca2+ pump (ATP2A3), respectively. Black colour bar represent the resistant group and ash colour bar represent the susceptible group of goats mRNA expression level. Error bars represent standard errors of the means. ** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 by Student’s t-test assuming unequal variances