| Literature DB >> 30918580 |
Mariangela Ucci1,2, Pamela Di Tomo2,3, Federica Tritschler1,2, Vincenzo G P Cordone1,2, Paola Lanuti2,3, Giuseppina Bologna2,3, Sara Di Silvestre1,2, Natalia Di Pietro2,3, Caterina Pipino1,2, Domitilla Mandatori2,3, Gloria Formoso2,3, Assunta Pandolfi1,2.
Abstract
Diabetes is associated with vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, promoting the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Several studies showed that a carotenoid-rich diet is associated to a reduced cardiovascular risk in healthy and diabetic subjects, although the mechanisms of action are still unknown. Here, the potential role of β-carotene (BC) and lycopene (Lyc) in human endothelial cells isolated from human umbilical cord vein (HUVECs) of women with gestational diabetes (GD) and respective controls (C) has been investigated. Results showed that BC and Lyc reduced the tumor necrosis factor alpha- (TNF-α-) stimulated monocyte-endothelium interaction (adhesion assay), membrane exposure (flow cytometry), and total expression levels (Western blot) of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in both cell types. Moreover, the treatment with BC and Lyc reduced the TNF-α-induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB (image flow cytometry) by preserving bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO, flow cytometry, and cGMP EIA kit assay), a key vasoactive molecule. Notably, BC and Lyc pretreatment significantly reduced peroxynitrite levels (flow cytometry), contributing to the redox balance protection. These results suggest a new mechanism of action of carotenoids which exert vascular protective action in diabetic condition, thus reinforcing the importance of a carotenoid-rich diet in the prevention of diabetes cardiovascular complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30918580 PMCID: PMC6409051 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8184656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Clinical characteristics of control (C, n = 10) and gestational diabetic (GD, n = 12) women.
| Characteristic | C-women | GD-women |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 35 ± 7.1 | 34 ± 5.67 |
| Height (cm) | 163.75 ± 5.66 | 162.4 ± 7.93 |
| Pregestational weight (kg) | 68.14 ± 13 | 67.1 ± 10.73 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.49 ± 5.18 | 27.81 ± 2.97 |
|
| ||
| Basal glycaemia | 4.5 ± 0.24 | 5.1 ± 0.24∗∗ |
| 1 h glycaemia | 8.1 ± 0.99 | 10.2 ± 1.16∗∗ |
| 2 h glycaemia | 6.54 ± 1.14 | 8.04 ± 1.71∗ |
| OGTT gestational week | 27.9 ± 2.4 | 24.4 ± 4.7 |
| SBP (mm/Hg) | 107.6 ± 8.87 | 105.5 ± 10.7 |
| DBP (mm/Hg) | 71.4 ± 9.1 | 68.4 ± 10.57 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. BMI: body mass index, OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure. ∗∗p < 0.05; ∗p < 0.0001.
Figure 1Effect of carotenoids on TNF-α-induced monocyte interaction in C- and GD-HUVECs. Monocyte-HUVEC adhesion in C- and GD-HUVECs untreated (Basal) and incubated for 24 h with BC or Lyc (2.5 μmol/L) and then stimulated for 16 h with or without TNF-α (1 ng/mL). In the histogram (upper side), quantitative data express the number of U937 cells adhering within a high-power field (3.5mm2). Each measurement is expressed as the mean ± SD of adhering cells from 3 experiments (n = 3), each consisting of 8 counts per condition. In the lower side, representative photos of C- and GD-HUVECs for each experimental condition. ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison test:∗p < 0.05 vs. basal C-HUVECs, ∗∗p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs, ∗∗∗p < 0.05 vs. Basal GD-HUVECs, #p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α GD-HUVECs. Student'st-test:†p < 0.0002 basal GD-HUVECs vs. basal C-HUVECs, ‡p < 0.0001 TNF-α GD-HUVECs vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs.
Figure 2The effect of carotenoids on adhesion molecule membrane exposure and total expression after TNF-α-stimulation in C- and GD-HUVECs. VCAM-1 (a) and ICAM-1 (b) membrane exposure in C- and GD-HUVECs untreated (basal) and incubated for 24 h with BC or Lyc (2.5 μmol/L) and then stimulated for 16 h with or without TNF-α (1 ng/mL). Quantitative data in histograms result from 4 different experiments (n = 4). The results are expressed as the percentage of positive cells for surface exposure on the plasma membrane of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in not permeabilized cells. Representative Western blot and its histogram for VCAM-1 (c) and ICAM-1 (d) total protein expression in C- and GD-HUVECs untreated (Basal) and incubated for 24 h with 2.5 μmol/L of BC (left panels) or Lyc (right panels) and then stimulated for 16 h with or without TNF-α (1 ng/mL). Quantitative data in histograms result from 3 different experiments (n = 3). The results for the VCAM-1 or ICAM-1 and β-actin ratio are expressed as arbitrary units, and data are shown as fold increase vs. basal condition of the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison test:∗p < 0.05 vs. basal C-HUVECs, ∗∗p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs, ∗∗∗p < 0.05 vs. basal GD-HUVECs, #p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α GD-HUVECs. Student'st-test: in (a) and (b), †p < 0.001 and §p = 0.05 basal GD-HUVECs vs. basal C-HUVECs, ‡p < 0.05 TNF-α GD-HUVECs vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs; in (c) and (d), †p < 0.03 and ‡p < 0.05 TNF-α GD-HUVECs vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs.
Figure 3The effect of carotenoids on TNF-α-increased NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation levels in C- and GD-HUVECs. The histogram (a) and representative single-cell images (b) of NF-κB p65 cytoplasm-nucleus translocation in untreated (basal) or TNF-α stimulated C- and GD-HUVECs after preincubation for 24 h with of BC or Lyc (2.5 μmol/L). In (a), data in the histogram result from 3 independent experiments (n = 3) and are expressed as the percentage of positive cells for nucleus-NF-κB p65 colocalization. In (b), nuclei are stained in red and NF-κB p65 in green for each experimental condition. ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison test:∗p < 0.05 vs. basal C-HUVECs, ∗∗p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs, ∗∗∗p < 0.05 vs. basal GD-HUVECs, #p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α GD-HUVECs. Student'st-test: †p < 0.01 basal GD-HUVECs vs. basal C-HUVECs, ‡p < 0.005 TNF-α GD-HUVECs vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs.
Figure 4The effects of carotenoids on NO bioavailability in C- and GD-HUVECs. (a) Nitric oxide generation measured by DAF-2DA cytometric analysis and (b) cGMP levels measured by an EIA kit in HUVECs pretreated with BC or Lyc (2.5 mmol/L) in the presence or absence of 16 h stimulation with TNF-α (1 ng/mL). The stimulation with ionomycin (Iono, 2 μmol/L) for 24 h with or without L-NAME (LN, 1 mmol/L) preincubation (45 minutes) is used as a positive control. In (a), data are expressed as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio (signal to noise ratio) from 4 independent experiments (n = 4). In (b), data result from 3 different experiments (n = 3) and are expressed as fmol/well. ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison test:∗p < 0.05 vs. basal and ∗∗p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α in GD-HUVECs, #p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α C-HUVECs. Student'st-test: †p < 0.05 vs. basal and ‡p < 0.05 vs. Iono C-HUVECs.
Figure 5The effect of carotenoids on peroxynitrite levels in C- and GD-HUVECs. Intracellular peroxynitrite production in C- and GD-HUVECs incubated for 24 h with BC or Lyc (2.5 μmol/L) with or without TNF-α-stimulation (1 ng/mL) for 16 h. Data in the histogram are expressed as the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio (signal to noise ratio) of 4 independent experiments (n = 4). Phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, 200 ng/mL) and ionomycin (Iono, 50 nM) for 30 min before the assay are used as positive controls for endogenous peroxynitrite production. ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison test:∗p < 0.05 vs. basal C-HUVECs, #p < 0.05 vs. TNF-α GD-HUVECs. Student'st-test: †p < 0.05 basal GD-HUVECs vs. basal C-HUVECs.