Literature DB >> 30918276

Accurate regional influenza epidemics tracking using Internet search data.

Shaoyang Ning1, Shihao Yang1, S C Kou2.   

Abstract

Accurate, high-resolution tracking of influenza epidemics at the regional level helps public health agencies make informed and proactive decisions, especially in the face of outbreaks. Internet users' online searches offer great potential for the regional tracking of influenza. However, due to the complex data structure and reduced quality of Internet data at the regional level, few established methods provide satisfactory performance. In this article, we propose a novel method named ARGO2 (2-step Augmented Regression with GOogle data) that efficiently combines publicly available Google search data at different resolutions (national and regional) with traditional influenza surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for accurate, real-time regional tracking of influenza. ARGO2 gives very competitive performance across all US regions compared with available Internet-data-based regional influenza tracking methods, and it has achieved 30% error reduction over the best alternative method that we numerically tested for the period of March 2009 to March 2018. ARGO2 is reliable and robust, with the flexibility to incorporate additional information from other sources and resolutions, making it a powerful tool for regional influenza tracking, and potentially for tracking other social, economic, or public health events at the regional or local level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30918276      PMCID: PMC6437143          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41559-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  28 in total

1.  Automated time series forecasting for biosurveillance.

Authors:  Howard S Burkom; Sean Patrick Murphy; Galit Shmueli
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Using internet searches for influenza surveillance.

Authors:  Philip M Polgreen; Yiling Chen; David M Pennock; Forrest D Nelson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Twitter improves influenza forecasting.

Authors:  Michael J Paul; Mark Dredze; David Broniatowski
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  Improving the evidence base for decision making during a pandemic: the example of 2009 influenza A/H1N1.

Authors:  Marc Lipsitch; Lyn Finelli; Richard T Heffernan; Gabriel M Leung; Stephen C Redd
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2011-06

5.  When Google got flu wrong.

Authors:  Declan Butler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.

Authors:  Jeremy Ginsberg; Matthew H Mohebbi; Rajan S Patel; Lynnette Brammer; Mark S Smolinski; Larry Brilliant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Using web search query data to monitor dengue epidemics: a new model for neglected tropical disease surveillance.

Authors:  Emily H Chan; Vikram Sahai; Corrie Conrad; John S Brownstein
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-05-31

8.  Forecasting Influenza Outbreaks in Boroughs and Neighborhoods of New York City.

Authors:  Wan Yang; Donald R Olson; Jeffrey Shaman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Advances in nowcasting influenza-like illness rates using search query logs.

Authors:  Vasileios Lampos; Andrew C Miller; Steve Crossan; Christian Stefansen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Advances in using Internet searches to track dengue.

Authors:  Shihao Yang; Samuel C Kou; Fred Lu; John S Brownstein; Nicholas Brooke; Mauricio Santillana
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  6 in total

1.  COVID-19 forecasts using Internet search information in the United States.

Authors:  Simin Ma; Shihao Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  COVID-19 hospitalizations forecasts using internet search data.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Simin Ma; Soobin Baek; Shihao Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Sepsis information-seeking behaviors via Wikipedia between 2015 and 2018: A mixed methods retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Craig S Jabaley; Robert F Groff; Theresa J Barnes; Mark E Caridi-Scheible; James M Blum; Vikas N O'Reilly-Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Use Internet search data to accurately track state level influenza epidemics.

Authors:  Shihao Yang; Shaoyang Ning; S C Kou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Tracking and predicting U.S. influenza activity with a real-time surveillance network.

Authors:  Sequoia I Leuba; Reza Yaesoubi; Marina Antillon; Ted Cohen; Christoph Zimmer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Surveillance of early stage COVID-19 clusters using search query logs and mobile device-based location information.

Authors:  Shohei Hisada; Taichi Murayama; Kota Tsubouchi; Sumio Fujita; Shuntaro Yada; Shoko Wakamiya; Eiji Aramaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.