| Literature DB >> 30918244 |
Zeke Liu1,2, Yaxu Zhong2, Ibrahim Shafei2, Ryan Borman2, Soojin Jeong2, Jun Chen2, Yaroslav Losovyj2, Xinfeng Gao2, Na Li3,4, Yaping Du4,5, Erik Sarnello6, Tao Li6,7, Dong Su3, Wanli Ma8, Xingchen Ye9.
Abstract
Metal-oxide nanocrystals doped with aliovalent atoms can exhibit tunable infrared localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPRs). Yet, the range of dopant types and concentrations remains limited for many metal-oxide hosts, largely because of the difficulty in establishing reaction kinetics that favors dopant incorporation by using the co-thermolysis method. Here we develop cation-exchange reactions to introduce p-type dopants (Cu+, Ag+, etc.) into n-type metal-oxide nanocrystals, producing programmable LSPR redshifts due to dopant compensation. We further demonstrate that enhanced n-type doping can be realized via sequential cation-exchange reactions mediated by the Cu+ ions. Cation-exchange transformations add a new dimension to the design of plasmonic nanocrystals, allowing preformed nanocrystals to be used as templates to create compositionally diverse nanocrystals with well-defined LSPR characteristics. The ability to tailor the doping profile postsynthetically opens the door to a multitude of opportunities to deepen our understanding of the relationship between local structure and LSPR properties.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30918244 PMCID: PMC6437201 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09165-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Synthesis and structural characterization of Cu:ICO NCs. a Reaction scheme of the selective cation-exchange reaction. b–e TEM images of (b) ICO NCs (λinitial = 2196 nm) and c–e Cu:ICO NCs synthesized by reacting ICO NCs with varying concentrations of CuCl2. f STEM-HAADF image of a single NC for samples shown in (e). g–j STEM-EELS elemental maps of Cu:ICO NCs obtained after reacting ICO NCs with 75 mM CuCl2. Elemental maps for (g) Cu, (h) Cd, (i) In, and (j) overlay of three micrographs are shown. Scale bars: (b–e) 20 nm, (f) 2 nm, and (g–j) 10 nm. k Elemental composition of ICO and Cu:ICO NCs measured with SEM-EDS (assuming Cu + Cd + In = 100%). The total Cd content of pristine ICO NCs was determined by using ICP-MS. l Plot of the atomic ratio between Cd and In for Cu:ICO NCs vs. the input Cu/Cd ratio. m and n Statistical analysis of NC size for ICO and Cu:ICO NCs based on (m) TEM images and (n) SAXS data. o Powder XRD patterns of ICO and Cu:ICO NCs. The pattern of vertical lines shown at the bottom corresponds to the powder XRD pattern of bulk CdO phase (JCPDS Card no. 03-065-2908). The error bars in (k) and (m) represent the standard deviation between measurements on the same sample. A minimum of three SEX-EDX measurements were performed over different spots to determine the average atomic ratios presented in (k). The NC size values shown in (m) were determined by statistical analysis of more than 1000 NCs from TEM images
Fig. 2LSPR characteristics and electronic structure of Cu:ICO NCs. a UV–Vis–NIR spectra of ICO and Cu:ICO NCs. b Plots of (αhν)2 vs. photon energy for samples shown in (a). α: absorption coefficient. The dotted lines represent extrapolation from the linear region of the curves with the x-axis intercepts indicated in the legends. Plots for NCs reacted with 100 and 200 mM CuCl2 are not included because of the strong scattering background due to sample agglomeration. c High-resolution XPS spectra in the Cu2p region for Cu:ICO NCs. The dotted rectangles highlight the shake-up features attributed to Cu2+, whereas the two peaks centered at 933 and 952 eV, respectively, are signals arising from either Cu+ or Cu2+. d UPS spectra in the secondary electron cut-off region and e Fermi level EF and valence band edge Ev (with respect to vacuum) for ICO and Cu:ICO NCs
Summary of LSPR characteristics and elemental analysis results for ICO and Cu:ICO NCs
| [CuCl2] (mM) | Measured Cu (%) | Δ |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 2196 | 0.565 | 0.105 | 5.38 | 14,423 | 753.13 | 6.29 |
| 1 | 0.3 | 2259 | 0.549 | 0.090 | 6.10 | 14,030 | 629.30 | 5.95 |
| 10 | 1.8 | 2309 | 0.537 | 0.090 | 5.97 | 13,726 | 632.40 | 5.69 |
| 25 | 4.2 | 2368 | 0.524 | 0.089 | 5.89 | 13,391 | 633.76 | 5.41 |
| 50 | 8.2 | 2399 | 0.517 | 0.102 | 5.07 | 13,183 | 739.52 | 5.25 |
| 75 | 10.9 | 2501 | 0.496 | 0.107 | 4.64 | 12,639 | 761.18 | 4.83 |
| 100 | 14.6 | 2822 | 0.440 | 0.165 | 2.67 | 11,231 | 1172.8 | 3.80 |
Notes: Cu concentrations (Cu/(Cu + Cd + In) %) were measured by using SEM-EDS. λ: LSPR peak wavelength, E: LSPR peak energy, ΔE: LSPR full width at half maximum, Q: LSPR quality factor (E/ΔE), ωp: bulk plasma frequency, Γ: free carrier damping constant, and Ne: free carrier concentration
Fig. 3Kinetic study of cation-exchange reactions between ICO NCs (λinitial = 2222 nm) and CuCl2. a UV–Vis–NIR spectra of Cu:ICO NCs isolated at different times from the reaction between ICO NCs and 100 mM CuCl2. b Free carrier concentrations retrieved from Drude fits to absorption spectra and Cu contents measured by SEM-EDS and XPS for Cu:ICO NCs isolated at different times from the reaction between ICO NCs and 100 mM CuCl2. c High-resolution Cu2p XPS spectra of Cu:ICO NCs isolated from the reaction between ICO NCs and 100 mM CuCl2 at different times. d Plot of the ratio between Cu concentrations determined by SEM-EDS and XPS measurements vs. reaction time. e Low-temperature (77 K) EPR spectra of 100 mM CuCl2 solution and ICO NCs after reacting with 100 mM CuCl2 for 0.5, 10, and 60 min. Inset: Time-dependent normalized integral peak intensities showing that nearly all Cu2+ ions were reduced to Cu+ within the first 30 s. f Proposed mechanistic scheme for the reaction between ICO NCs and CuCl2
Summary of LSPR characteristics and elemental composition retrieved from kinetics study
| Time (min) | Cu (%) measured by EDX | Cu (%) measured by XPS | Cu content (EDX)/Cu content (XPS) | Δ |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 2222 | 0.558 | 0.094 | 5.94 | 14,290 | 676.47 | 6.17 |
| 0.5 | 4.4 | 7.4 | 0.59 | 2574 | 0.482 | 0.122 | 3.95 | 12,294 | 861.94 | 4.57 |
| 2 | 5.0 | 8.1 | 0.62 | 2596 | 0.478 | 0.125 | 3.82 | 12,167 | 865.16 | 4.47 |
| 10 | 8.0 | 12.6 | 0.63 | 2660 | 0.466 | 0.132 | 3.53 | 11,966 | 887.85 | 4.27 |
| 30 | 13.3 | 15.8 | 0.84 | 2764 | 0.449 | 0.145 | 3.10 | 11,879 | 1002.22 | 3.95 |
| 60 | 19.1 | 26.3 | 0.73 | 2820 | 0.440 | 0.165 | 2.67 | 11,443 | 1109.19 | 3.80 |
| 120 | 19.5 | 29.1 | 0.67 | 2848 | 0.435 | 0.158 | 2.75 | 11,210 | 1038.84 | 3.76 |
Fig. 4Versatility of cation-exchange reactions for LSPR spectral tuning in doped metal-oxide NCs. a UV–Vis–NIR spectra. b, c TEM images of Ag:ICO NCs synthesized by reacting ICO NCs with various concentrations of AgNO3 for 1 h. Scale bars: 20 nm. d UV–Vis–NIR spectra and e XPS spectra of Cu:ITO NCs synthesized by reacting ITO NCs with various concentrations of CuCl2. f UV–Vis–NIR spectra and g XPS spectra of Fe:ITO NCs synthesized by reacting ITO NCs with various concentrations of FeCl3
Fig. 5Tuning LSPR energies of ICO NCs via sequential cation-exchange reactions. a Proposed scheme for the sequential cation-exchange reactions. b UV–Vis–NIR spectra and c elemental composition determined by SEM-EDS analysis, and d powder XRD patterns for ICO NCs, Cu:ICO NCs and NCs obtained by reacting Cu:ICO NCs with In(ac)3 at different temperatures. e, f TEM images of NCs synthesized by reacting Cu:ICO NCs with In(ac)3 at (e) 150 °C and (f) 250 °C. Scale bars: 20 nm