Ashok Malla1,2, Mushtaq Margoob3,4,5, Srividya Iyer1,2,6, Ridha Joober1,7,8, Shalini Lal9,10,11, Rangawsamy Thara12, Huda Mushtaq5,13, Bilal Issaoui Mansouri1. 1. 1 Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada. 2. 2 Douglas Hospital Research Centre, ACCESS Open Minds network, Montréal, Quebec, Canada. 3. 3 Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Studies Research Centre, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Awantipore, Kashmir, India. 4. 4 Advanced Institute of Management of Stress and life style related Problems (AIMS), Nigeen, Hazratbal, Srinagar, Kashmir, India. 5. 5 Supporting Always Wholeheartedly All Broken-hearted (SAWAB), Kashmir, India. 6. 6 Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada. 7. 7 Program of Early intervention and Prevention of Psychoses, Douglas Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 8. 8 Research Program on Psychotic and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 9. 9 School of Rehabilitation, CHUM Research Center, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 10. 10 CHUM Research Center, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 11. 11 CHUM Research Center, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 12. 12 Schizophrenia Research Foundation (SCARF), Chennai, India. 13. 13 Consultant Clinical Psychology Research Unit, Advanced Institute of Management of Stress and life style related Problems (AIMS), Nigeen Hazratbal, Srinagar, Kashmir, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), major mental disorders often remain untreated because of barriers related to access and resources. In rural areas and in conflict-ridden regions, the problem can be exacerbated by increased rates of mental illness and by reduced access to care. This paper describes a project designed to provide mental health services for major mental disorders among youth using a low-cost model in a rural district of the troubled Kashmir valley. METHODS: We describe the geographic and political context, the guiding principles and adaptation of the service model (through partnership with a voluntary organization and use of technology), and the implementation of the model using Theory of Change framework. The core of the intervention was to train a pool of lay health workers (LHWs) to provide mental health services to young (aged 14-30 years) people with major mental disorders in their own communities, supported by clinical professionals. RESULTS: Despite political turmoil and major floods, 40 (male and female) LHWs were trained. The LHWs efficiently engaged in case identification, basic interventions, and data collection on outcomes. Several different stakeholders were engaged in activities relevant to the objectives of the project; however, the use of technologies was moderated by several challenges, including access to internet services and patient preference for personal contact. CONCLUSIONS: This service model is applicable in an environment where protracted political and armed conflict, low resources, and geographical isolation make exclusive reliance on scarce professional services impractical.
OBJECTIVES: In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), major mental disorders often remain untreated because of barriers related to access and resources. In rural areas and in conflict-ridden regions, the problem can be exacerbated by increased rates of mental illness and by reduced access to care. This paper describes a project designed to provide mental health services for major mental disorders among youth using a low-cost model in a rural district of the troubled Kashmir valley. METHODS: We describe the geographic and political context, the guiding principles and adaptation of the service model (through partnership with a voluntary organization and use of technology), and the implementation of the model using Theory of Change framework. The core of the intervention was to train a pool of lay health workers (LHWs) to provide mental health services to young (aged 14-30 years) people with major mental disorders in their own communities, supported by clinical professionals. RESULTS: Despite political turmoil and major floods, 40 (male and female) LHWs were trained. The LHWs efficiently engaged in case identification, basic interventions, and data collection on outcomes. Several different stakeholders were engaged in activities relevant to the objectives of the project; however, the use of technologies was moderated by several challenges, including access to internet services and patient preference for personal contact. CONCLUSIONS: This service model is applicable in an environment where protracted political and armed conflict, low resources, and geographical isolation make exclusive reliance on scarce professional services impractical.
Entities:
Keywords:
case identification; conflict in kashmir; global mental health; health technology in low-middle income countries; india; lay health worker model; low-to-middle income countries; stakeholder engagement; theory of change; youth mental health
Mental disorders, especially major depressive, psychotic, bipolar, and addiction disorders,
account for a major portion of disability, general morbidity, and premature mortality worldwide,[1-3] and continue to remain largely untreated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
because of resource-related barriers, especially in rural areas.[2,4,5] Both incidence and prevalence are relatively high due to the high proportion of
younger (under 25 years) people in the population in LMIC, and most mental disorders having
their onset before the age of 25.[1] Consequently, three-quarters of the burden of mental, neurological, and substance
abuse exists in LIMCs.[6]Large-scale violent conflicts increase the incidence and prevalence of mental illness as
well as reduce access to care.[7-10] The aim of this 2-part report was to describe the adaptation, implementation, and
results of a low-cost, skills transfer-based, technology-enhanced, service-delivery model
designed to address the unmet mental health needs of young people in a rural district,
within the conflict-ridden valley of Kashmir, in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Background
The state of Jammu and Kashmir, a mostly mountainous region at the northern tip of the
Indian subcontinent, has been subject to 3 decades of armed conflict, severely affecting the
Kashmir valley. The conflict dates back 70 years following the partition of India, the
creation of Pakistan, and a de-facto division of the state into one-third Pakistani and
two-thirds Indian control. The 2 countries have not been able to resolve their differences
nor have the people of the state had an independent voice in deciding their future. Within
the Indian-administered Kashmir valley, this conflict was mostly non-violent for decades
until it erupted in a full-fledged armed insurgency in 1989-1990, supported primarily by
Pakistan, with an equally severe counterinsurgency response from the Indian armed forces.
The people of Indian-administered Kashmir valley have lived in an atmosphere of perpetual
siege and have suffered both at the hands of the armed insurgents and the counterinsurgency.
This has resulted in more than 70,000 civilian and military deaths, exodus and internal
displacement of more than 150,000-300,000 Kashmiri Hindus and 50,000-150,0000 Kashmiri
Muslims, and the subjugation of a people in their own land.[11-13]
Impact of Prolonged Armed Conflict on Mental Health of the People
Studies on mental health, conducted during these years of conflict, have demonstrated a
high prevalence of mental disorders related to the impact of the armed conflict.[14-20] The worst of the violence has coincided with a documented 30-fold increase in the
incidence and prevalence of mental disorders in the region.[7,8] Earlier studies[21] reported that one-third of the population showed evidence of psychological distress
and suicidal ideation among adults. More recent studies[17] have reported even higher rates, ranging from 19% for post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) to 41% for “probable depression” in adults, and a prevalence of 22% to 27% for
childhood disorders (aged 8-14 years).[20] No specific studies on mental disorders in young people (aged 14-30 years)—during the
peak years of onset—have been conducted. This substantially increased prevalence of mental
disorders among this cohort has also been confirmed by several local surveys.[14-16,18,19] Even as early as 1990-1994, the number of cases seen in the hospital clinics
increased ten-fold from 1762 in 1990 to 17,584 in 1994.[18]
Service Response and Access to Treatment
The well-documented paucity of mental health services in LMICs is related mainly to a lack
of trained professionals and adequate structures within an already underfunded and
overburdened general health care system.[22] The need to create capacity for the adequate and timely treatment of mental disorders
in LMICs has been well articulated in the Lancet Global Mental Health series.[23] The delivery of effective treatments needs to be adapted to the reality of a dearth
of trained mental health professionals, including, but not limited to, psychiatrists.[24,26] There has been a strong effort to develop mental health services through the
existing, albeit poorly resourced, primary health care in India.[24-26]In Kashmir, a district mental health program (DMHP) was initiated under a national (Indian)
plan in 1996 to provide decentralized community-based mental health services. While several studies[30,31] have shown the feasibility of delivering mental health care through primary health
care, including the transfer and sharing of specialists’ tasks, the scale-up of such a model
has been hindered by the low level of community participation, a lack of trained staff, and,
above all, a lack of political will and funding.[31,32]
Status of Mental Health Problems and Services in Kashmir
Despite the reported increase in the prevalence of mental disorders in the entire state
of Jammu and Kashmir (est. population 12.55 million), there are 41 psychiatrists, who are
situated mostly at the teaching institutions in the 2 main cities of Jammu and Srinagar.
For the 10 districts of the Kashmir valley (est. population 6.8 million), at the start of
the project, there were 140 beds, with outpatient clinics providing services to patients
with a variety of mental disorders through 16 qualified psychiatrists, 12 psychologists,
and one social worker; 5-6 psychiatrists were allocated as district-level consultants
outside the city of Srinagar. Much of the psychiatric care is provided by a few
practitioners on a private fee-for-service basis, thus limiting access to those unable to
afford it.Rural areas have little or no access to mental health services that can provide
appropriate treatment of common as well as major mental disorders; this is despite a
dramatic increase in incidence and prevalence. Even though some basic health services are
provided through state-funded primary health care settings, these services are unable to
incorporate mental health services to rural populations. Incorporating mental health care
into the practices of primary health care physicians (PHCP) was undertaken in 2008.
Thirty-three PHCPs were trained by the National Institute of Mental Health and
Neurological Sciences (NIMHANS) in Bangalore, and this resulted in an allocation of 13
trained PHCPs as district mental health officers. However, within 5 months, only 2 of
these physicians still included mental health as part of their practice. Other attempts
have included the provision of counselling through non-medical health workers; however,
these health workers were attached to institutional settings[27] with questionable impact.[28] In general, the uptake of these initiatives has been poor and the level of training
has been perceived as inadequate.[35,36] Further, the “defeat depression campaign” resulted in little impact on the clinical
practices of PHCPs.[29]
Site Description
The district of Ganderbal in the Kashmir valley extends to the north from the outskirts
of the city of Srinagar through the Kangan valley to very remote mountainous regions,
including the Thajvas glaciers. The district has a population of 297,000, which is
predominantly rural (84%), with a low literacy rate (58% compared with the national
average of 74%).[30] Within this district, our project aimed to cover an area with a population of
200,000. We selected this region in 2013 because it had little or no access to
governmental mental health services. A 2-week Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP)
training initiative delivered by The Royal College of Psychiatrists (UK) in 2013[31] created little improvement in access to mental health services. The mental health
needs were served—albeit to a very limited extent—by SAWAB (“Supporting Always
Wholeheartedly All Broken-hearted,” an expression in Kashmiri meaning an act of kindness
without expecting anything in return), part of Voluntary Medical Society of Kashmir
(www.voluntarymedicare.org). SAWAB, led by the site principle investigator
(MM), was founded following the major earthquake disaster in 2006, and continues to offer
community support.
Adapting and Applying an LHW Model to Ganderbal, Kashmir
Our effort to develop a model of mental health care for this conflict-plagued region is in
line with the needs and deficits identified above. A working model of care must be feasible
and cost-effective in the context of scarce resources and be adaptable to the specific local
culture and socio-demographic and political context. In general, under such circumstances,
it is important to prioritize different needs and interventions that aim for cost-effective,
mobile, and scalable solutions without needing to rely heavily on a highly educated,
professional workforce.Previous models of mental health care have integrated mental health care into the primary
care setting,[32,33] demonstrated their effectiveness in LMICs,[22] and used LHWs as well as telepsychiatry[34] for implementation. Telepsychiatric interventions are feasible and effective,[42,43] linking specialists to remote regions and reducing inpatient utilization and costs.[44,45] The integration of mental health services into primary care and the training of
primary care health workers are often suggested as a workable and efficient,[28,29,33,46,47] and, such models are supported by the Government of India. However, in the Ganderbal
district, as outlined in the previous section, it was difficult to use primary health care
to deliver psychiatric care to young people with major mental disorders who were receiving
limited, if any, care from a poorly resourced SAWAB.Alternate models, such as the use of voluntary specialist teams from larger centres, have
provided “psychosocial support and treatment” using mental health camps in collaboration
with scant local resources in other jurisdictions facing civil and military conflict.[35] Our choice of a model utilizing trained LHWs was, however, based on several
considerations, including strong evidence supporting the training of “lay”
(non-professional) individuals to fill the gap due to the absence or scarcity of specialists[36] and the feasibility of using this model in making treatment of common disorders such
as, depression and anxiety, available to a larger population, especially those in rural
areas, as demonstrated in other parts of India.[37-39] Often these are provided through, or in partnership with, a voluntary organization or
a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO). The type of services provided by LHWs can range from
prevention to case identification and psychosocial interventions. This model has the
potential to build local capacity and has a higher chance of sustainability due to the
involvement of local personnel. However, it needs to be tested in a wider range of settings,[39] including high-conflict regions replete with their unique challenges.
Using Theory of Change to Guide Local Adaptation and Implementation
The purpose of this project was to adapt and apply components of an LHW model in the
context of protracted civil and military conflict, relative geographic isolation, and
limited means of communication, through a partnership with an active voluntary service
(SAWAB). Given the complexity of this challenge, we developed a Theory of Change framework[40] that involved backward mapping the pathway to a clearly identified envisioned impact
from a well-characterised starting point (see Figure 1). Our theory of change was developed over
several weeks through a process of iterative inquiry and dialogue between project
stakeholders (principle investigator AM, co-principle investigator MM and his local team,
and Co-investigators SI, SL) using teleconference meetings and extensive follow-up through
email communications. Consultation with an expert in the use of theory of change within
global mental health contexts helped us to reflect on the various factors, assumptions, and
considerations involved in influencing the project’s envisioned impact on the untreated
prevalence of mental disorders and long-term outcomes (i.e., significant reduction in
symptoms and improvement in functioning and well-being) among young people (aged 14-30
years).
Figure 1.
Theory of Change framework for a low-cost model for improving mental health in rural
Kashmir, India.
Theory of Change framework for a low-cost model for improving mental health in rural
Kashmir, India.The content of the theory was influenced by local knowledge; clinical service experience in
youth mental health care, including early case identification; and research in global youth
mental health. We began by identifying preconditions that needed to be fulfilled to achieve
the desired long-term outcomes of reducing symptoms and improving functioning and wellbeing;
e.g., an increase in the number of young people identified with mental disorders in the
community: this identified at least 200 cases. This was based on 3 factors: knowledge of the
number of cases previously treated by the local SAWAB organization within the preceding 2
years (n = 187, mean = 94 per year), research of the literature pertaining
to unmet need in youth mental health, and an understanding of the feasibility of what can be
achieved within the project timeline and scope. Next, we determined the intermediate goals
and interventions that would be required to meet the preconditions. An important
intermediate goal was to engage key stakeholder groups in the community. We brainstormed a
list of different stakeholder groups that would be important to engage in terms of raising
their awareness of mental health and how they could access services if they identified a
young person in need. We also determined that a key way to facilitate access to care would
be through LHWs recruited from the region who would be trained and supervised to deliver
basic mental health care. The key assumptions made in asserting that the intermediate goals
were attainable and would lead to the longer-term outcomes included: social acceptance by
key stakeholders and the need for the involvement of the latter; stability of the social and
political context; ability to recruit LHWs (both male and female); availability of transport
to access relatively remote rural areas; patients’ level of comfort with LHWs; availability,
willingness and motivation of professionals to provide supervision to LHWs; and access to
technology for LHWs to maintain contact with their patients, for access to training
material, and for data collection. The Theory of Change framework served as a blueprint for
the implementation of the project and helped communicate its rationale and approach to key
stakeholders and secure their involvement. It can serve as a model for the development and
delivery of low-cost mental healthcare services in similar communities (see Figure 1).
Adaptation of the LHW Model to Local Context and Objectives
The implementation of the LHW model required an adaptation to the local needs and
political, cultural, and geographic context. We focused on the following WHO-identified
major mental disorders: major depressive, psychotic, bipolar and addiction disorders, as
well as trauma-related presentations[2,41] in the 14-30 year age range.[1] Apart from being the peak age of onset of mental disorders, this age group forms a
relatively high proportion of the population.[42] (The 2011 census shows that 49.91% of the population in India are under 24
years.)We implemented the LHW Model following 2 key adaptations:We made extensive use of mobile technology (cellphones, notebooks, television, and
electronic media) for improving community mental health literacy, training, service
delivery, and evaluation.We attempted to integrate available infrastructures and resources in the region
(i.e., volunteer medical organizations and their networks with primary care services,
religious, and cultural leaders, and the Department of Psychiatry of the Kashmir
University). To overcome potential social barriers, we built upon the work and
networks of SAWAB; relied on the expertise of the project principle investigator (AM)
and the site principle investigator (MM), who, being Kashmiri natives, knew the local
sociocultural and geopolitical context.
Project Objectives
Our primary objectives were to: 1) Adapt and implement an LHW model to the present
context of a prolonged conflict that was affecting civilians as well as poor access to
mental health services; 2) Enhance mental health awareness among stakeholders and the
local population; 3) Promote the identification of major mental disorders among those not
receiving any professional care; and 4) Reduce symptoms and distress and improve
functioning and wellbeing among those treated. Our secondary objectives were to: 1) Create
a pool of trained LHWs; 2) Strengthen the capacity of the local voluntary organization and
its network to meet the mental health needs of an underserved population; and 3) Foster
dialogue and joint action on mental health issues among multiple stakeholders.
Training of LHWs
We recruited and trained 40 LHWs (18 males and 22 females) from villages within the
Ganderbal district, each worker covering an average of 5000 residents. The LHWs were
fluent in Kashmiri and Urdu, at least 20 years old, and had sound knowledge of the local
communities. Although not required, most (80%) had a college education and all were
retained until the end of the project.The training of LHWs began in September 2014 and comprised one week of didactic lectures
supplemented by 3 months of field training. The didactic lectures were provided by the
site principle investigator (MM), the project principle investigator (AM) and
collaborators (a psychiatrist, community medicine specialist and a general physician),
whereas the field training consisted of direct clinical exposure by shadowing clinicians
and direct instructions from clinicians in the outpatient clinics run through the
Voluntary Medical Society (VMS). The training was based on a manual developed jointly by
the investigators in both countries. The manual incorporated materials taken from numerous
expert sources in the field that were available at the time (e.g., the COPSI manual for
working with people with schizophrenia and their families,[43] the manual for health counselors from the Manas Program,[44] the WHO’s mhGAP Intervention Guide[45]). It included 9 modules covering the etiology of mental illness, principles of
providing care (including ethics, compassion, confidentiality etc.), suicide prevention,
adherence management, psychoeducation of patients and families, health promotion,
psychosocial rehabilitation, and relapse prevention. Further, the training program
included extensive discussions on note taking, a protocol for risk management, and
fieldwork. Following training, LHWs reported significant positive change in their
knowledge of and perceptions about the nature of mental illness, symptoms, treatment
possibilities, and the role of counseling, as indicated by a high level (83%) of correct
responses on a post-training evaluation (see Supplemental information).
Integration of Existing Infrastructures and Stakeholder Engagement
A key step in the planning and implementation of the project was the engagement of key
stakeholders initiated by SAWAB, led by the site principle investigator (MM), in which the
trained LHWs participated. A total of 150 potential stakeholders attended at least one
meeting. Of these, 50 remained engaged throughout the project. These stakeholders included
religious leaders or imams, faith healers (locally called “Pirs”), school
teachers, local self-government leaders (in the Panchayat), community
health care personnel, previous SAWAB patients, and media personnel. Led by MM, the local
team informally met with stakeholders throughout the length of the project and formally
organized 6 mental health workshops to raise awareness about and de-stigmatize mental
illness and improve the identification and management of mental disorders. Involvement of
local imams and Pirs was particularly significant based on their high
social esteem. They had been the first points of contact for over 80% of SAWAB patients[46] but not major sources of referrals for service in the past. Previous mental health
care recipients, who were known to source over 70% of the referrals to SAWAB,[46] were also targeted for engagement. In addition to helping refine the service model
and promote the identification and referral of potential patients, stakeholders helped
promote mental health literacy, general acceptance, and engagement. For instance, imams
were encouraged to speak of mental health issues and the project in their Friday sermons,
which are highly attended by the almost exclusively Muslim population. During group
discussions with the project staff, stakeholders like imams and village heads expressed
trust in the project and enthusiasm for working with the LHWs and project staff to improve
mental health services and reduce stigma. In addition, an article in a popular English
newspaper, describing the importance of imams actively participating in efforts to
increase mental health awareness, was an example of raising local awareness about mental illness.[47]
Use of Technology
LHWs received training materials on their netbook computers, which they used to access
psychoeducation materials (videos, documents, for example). LHWs collected data through a
simple electronic tool accessible through Android iBall tablets and synchronized to a
cloud-based database. The database was accessible via a web-based portal developed
specifically for this project. LHWs also encouraged medication adherence and treatment
engagement through personal visits and regular phone and SMS contact with patients. Our
use of technology in patient engagement (e.g., being in touch or sending reminders by
text, among others) was not as extensive as planned. Most contact was made through home
visits (>90% of patients received home visits). The LHWs generally agreed that using
technology improved service delivery and quality of care but “could not replace direct
contact.” Challenges identified by the LHWs in using technology included inadequate mobile
network coverage, low mobile phone ownership rates because of poverty, power outages,
network blackouts (purportedly imposed for security reasons), and difficulties in text
messaging because of the relatively low literacy rates in the region.Print and broadcast media were used to promote mental health awareness, reduce stigma,
and advertise project services.[48] We commissioned short programs that used drama and song (integral to local cultural
and social fabric) on local TV and radio to disseminate information on mental disorders
through culturally determined models of attribution that emphasize local legends and
metaphors; this allowed us to convey the impact of the conflict on mental health and
promote the need for treatment.[49]
Case Identification and Intervention
Individuals (14-30 years) living in the region with putative mental disorders were
identified in their villages by assigned LHWs using several methods. These included direct
contact with or knowledge about families, who have members known or thought by the
community to have emotional and mental difficulties. Cases were also identified by several
stakeholders, especially local imams or Pirs;[46] other health workers and individuals who had sought and received mental health
services in the past from SAWAB; or through direct approach by families. Following any of
the above trajectories, the LHW visited the patient and family and conducted a preliminary
informal assessment regarding the nature of the problem and the difficulties faced by the
patient and the family. Once identified as possibly showing symptoms of mental illness,
the LHW arranged for consultation with a psychiatrist within 2 weeks.Two rooms were rented in a building in the town of Ganderbal (population 28,233) to be
used as the project clinic for consultations and as a dispensary for medication. A
psychiatrist visited the new clinic every 2 weeks to provide a psychiatric diagnostic
assessment to individuals identified by the LHWs and to recommended treatment (medication
or counselling or both). The psychiatrist involved the LHW in the initial assessment,
discussed the treatment plan, and provided a framework for close follow-up with the LHW.
The LHWs routinely conducted door-to-door home visits in their respective villages and the
SAWAB psychiatrist visited some patients at home only if the patient was unwilling or
unable to travel to the clinic. All medications and counselling were provided free of
charge. A patient in urgent need of hospitalization had access to the free inpatient
facilities at the hospital in Srinagar.Counselling, initiated by a SAWAB psychologist and then supported by the LHW, included
the provision of nonjudgmental, culturally appropriate support and psychoeducation. LHWs,
who also worked with patients’ families, teachers, and peers to reduce stigma, addressed
comorbid substance use and facilitated social, occupational, and/or academic
reintegration. LHWs offered a follow-up of 12 months to all patients, with more frequent
contact (minimum once in 2 weeks) in the first 3 months and in crisis situations.LHWs had continual access to their training materials online and received support and
supervision during face-to-face meetings, field visits, and web-based video conferencing
with SAWAB professionals. The feedback from the LHWs indicated a high level of
satisfaction with their work, strong emotional reactions on occasion related to sharing
similar traumatic experiences with their patients, and identified advocacy as an important
role.In Part-II of this report, we describe the methods of assessing and results on the
clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes for individuals treated in this
program. We further discuss the implications of the model used and the outcomes
achieved.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, LHW_Post-training_Case_scenarios for A Model of Mental Health Care
Involving Trained Lay Health Workers for Treatment of Major Mental Disorders Among Youth
in a Conflict-Ridden, Low-Middle Income Environment: Part I Adaptation and Implementation
by Ashok Malla, Mushtaq Margoob, Srividya Iyer, Ridha Joober, Shalini Lal, Rangawsamy
Thara, Huda Mushtaq and Bilal Issaoui Mansouri in The Canadian Journal of PsychiatryClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, LHW_Post-training_Quiz for A Model of Mental Health Care Involving
Trained Lay Health Workers for Treatment of Major Mental Disorders Among Youth in a
Conflict-Ridden, Low-Middle Income Environment: Part I Adaptation and Implementation by
Ashok Malla, Mushtaq Margoob, Srividya Iyer, Ridha Joober, Shalini Lal, Rangawsamy Thara,
Huda Mushtaq and Bilal Issaoui Mansouri in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Authors: Benedetto Saraceno; Mark van Ommeren; Rajaie Batniji; Alex Cohen; Oye Gureje; John Mahoney; Devi Sridhar; Chris Underhill Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-09-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Pamela Y Collins; Vikram Patel; Sarah S Joestl; Dana March; Thomas R Insel; Abdallah S Daar; Warwick Anderson; Muhammad A Dhansay; Anthony Phillips; Susan Shurin; Mark Walport; Wendy Ewart; Sir John Savill; Isabel A Bordin; E Jane Costello; Maureen Durkin; Christopher Fairburn; Roger I Glass; Wayne Hall; Yueqin Huang; Steven E Hyman; Kay Jamison; Sylvia Kaaya; Shitij Kapur; Arthur Kleinman; Adesola Ogunniyi; Angel Otero-Ojeda; Mu-Ming Poo; Vijayalakshmi Ravindranath; Barbara J Sahakian; Shekhar Saxena; Peter A Singer; Dan J Stein Journal: Nature Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Vikram Patel; Ricardo Araya; Sudipto Chatterjee; Dan Chisholm; Alex Cohen; Mary De Silva; Clemens Hosman; Hugh McGuire; Graciela Rojas; Mark van Ommeren Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dirceu Mabunda; Déborah Oliveira; Mohsin Sidat; Maria Tavares Cavalcanti; Vasco Cumbe; Flávio Mandlate; Milton Wainberg; Francine Cournos; Jair de Jesus Mari Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Raghu Paramasivam; Aravind Raj Elangovan; Senthil Amudhan; John Vijay Sagar Kommu; Harshal Haridas; Sudhir Babu Sriramalu Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2022-03-18