Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of air test (AT) and methylene blue perfusion test (MBPT) to detect the quality of the anastomosis in laparoscopic rectal cancer excision (Dixon), and compare the two approaches. Methods: AT is performed by filling the pelvis with saline solution and insufflating the rectum with air through a size 22 G balloon catheter (Foley). MBPT is carried out by surrounding clean sponges around anastomosis and injecting methylene blue solution into the rectum as like as AT. The balloon catheter connected manometer,ensuring the pressure in rectum can reach 40 cmH(2)O during AT and MBPT. The presence of air bubbles and overt blue-stained spillage indicated anastomotic leaks which are were resolved during surgery. All 28 patients undergoinglaparoscopic rectal excision received both AT and MBPT intraoperatively in a randomized fashion. The integrity of the anastomosis, postoperative vital signs, blood examination, drainage and postoperative imaging were analyzed. Results: All 28 patients received both tests successfully with no adverse event. MBPT Level 1 was detected in 15 cases, level 2 in 8 cases, level 3 in 5 cases. No MBPT level 4 was observed. AT level 1 was detected in 22 cases, level 2 in 5 cases, level 3 in 1 cases. No AT level 4 was founded. Three cases were diagnosed with postoperative anastomotic leakage (3/28, 10.71%), of which 2 cases were Grade B [definition and grading proposed by the international study group of rectal cancer (ISREC) in 2010]. One case was Grade C. The positive rate of MBPT was superior to AT (the McNemar testing, P<0.01). Conclusions: The two intraoperative tests are both technically feasible and safe. Compared to AT, MBPT has the advantage of localizing the leak site with a higher positive accuracy, and represents a promising standardized approach for intraoperative test of the anastomosis quality. Intraoperative repair is absolutely helpful for the level 3 and 4 intraoperative tests.
RCT Entities:
Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of air test (AT) and methylene blue perfusion test (MBPT) to detect the quality of the anastomosis in laparoscopic rectal cancer excision (Dixon), and compare the two approaches. Methods: AT is performed by filling the pelvis with saline solution and insufflating the rectum with air through a size 22 G balloon catheter (Foley). MBPT is carried out by surrounding clean sponges around anastomosis and injecting methylene blue solution into the rectum as like as AT. The balloon catheter connected manometer,ensuring the pressure in rectum can reach 40 cmH(2)O during AT and MBPT. The presence of air bubbles and overt blue-stained spillage indicated anastomotic leaks which are were resolved during surgery. All 28 patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal excision received both AT and MBPT intraoperatively in a randomized fashion. The integrity of the anastomosis, postoperative vital signs, blood examination, drainage and postoperative imaging were analyzed. Results: All 28 patients received both tests successfully with no adverse event. MBPT Level 1 was detected in 15 cases, level 2 in 8 cases, level 3 in 5 cases. No MBPT level 4 was observed. AT level 1 was detected in 22 cases, level 2 in 5 cases, level 3 in 1 cases. No AT level 4 was founded. Three cases were diagnosed with postoperative anastomotic leakage (3/28, 10.71%), of which 2 cases were Grade B [definition and grading proposed by the international study group of rectal cancer (ISREC) in 2010]. One case was Grade C. The positive rate of MBPT was superior to AT (the McNemar testing, P<0.01). Conclusions: The two intraoperative tests are both technically feasible and safe. Compared to AT, MBPT has the advantage of localizing the leak site with a higher positive accuracy, and represents a promising standardized approach for intraoperative test of the anastomosis quality. Intraoperative repair is absolutely helpful for the level 3 and 4 intraoperative tests.