| Literature DB >> 30916230 |
Catia Suely Palmeira1, Fernanda Carneiro Mussi2, Carlos Antônio Souza de Teles Santos3, Maria Lourdes Lima4, Ana Marice Teixeira Ladeia4, Lidia Cintia de Jesus Silva2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effect of remote nursing monitoring on the improvement of anthropometric measurements of overweight women.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30916230 PMCID: PMC6432992 DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.2651.3129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ISSN: 0104-1169
Figure 1Flowchart of allocation of the study population
Sociodemographic characteristics of overweight women at the baseline and according to the control and intervention groups. Salvador, BA, Brazil, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) ˘ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
*p-value; †SD - Standard Deviation; ‡Chi-square; §Fisher’s exact test; ||Minimum wage on 11/01/2017: R$ 937.00
Level of physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, eating habits and anthropometric characteristics of overweight women in the baseline and according to the group they were assigned, control group and the intervention group. Salvador, BA, Brazil, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*p-value; †Chi-square; ‡Fisher’s exact test; §SD - Standard Deviation; ||t-test
Intragroup comparisons of anthropometric measurements before and after remote monitoring. Salvador, BA, Brazil, 2017
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*p-value obtained in the paired t-test; †SD - Standard deviation; ‡BMI - Body mass index; §WC - Waist circumference
Effect of monitoring anthropometric measurements, comparing the control group and the intervention group. Salvador, BA, Brazil, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*SE - Standard error; †p-value obtained by the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for initial weight; ‡BMI - Body Mass Index; §WC - Waist circumference