Henna Budhwani1, Prabal De2,3. 1. Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 2. Department of Economics, Colin Powell School, City College, New York, New York. 3. Department of Economics, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York.
Abstract
Purpose: Addressing perceived and enacted stigma in clinical settings is critical to ensuring delivery of high-quality patient-centered care, reducing health disparities, and improving population health outcomes. Methods: Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System's (2012-2014) Reaction to Race module were analyzed to test the hypothesis that perceived stigma in health care settings would be associated with poorer physical and mental health. Poor health was measured by (1) the number of days the respondent was physically or mentally ill over the past month and (2) depressive disorder diagnosis. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were employed. Results: Effects of stigma on physical and mental health were significant. Perceived stigma was associated with additional 2.79 poor physical health days (β=2.79, confidence interval [CI]=1.84-3.75) and 2.92 more days of poor mental health (β=2.92, CI=1.97-3.86). Moreover, perceived stigma in health care settings was associated with 61% higher odds of reporting a depressive disorder (adjusted odds ratio=1.61, CI=1.29-2.00). Among other findings, individuals who were married, younger, had higher income, had college degrees, and were employed reported significantly fewer poor physical and mental health days and had lower odds of self-reported depressive disorder. Conclusions: Reducing stigma against people of color in health care settings (environments that should be pro-patient) must be a top priority for population health scholars and clinicians. Reducing perceived stigma in clinical settings may produce better mental and physical health outcomes in minority patients thereby reducing health disparities. In addition, fewer days lost to poor health could positively influence the health care system by decreasing utilization and may improve economic productivity through increasing days of good health.
Purpose: Addressing perceived and enacted stigma in clinical settings is critical to ensuring delivery of high-quality patient-centered care, reducing health disparities, and improving population health outcomes. Methods: Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System's (2012-2014) Reaction to Race module were analyzed to test the hypothesis that perceived stigma in health care settings would be associated with poorer physical and mental health. Poor health was measured by (1) the number of days the respondent was physically or mentally ill over the past month and (2) depressive disorder diagnosis. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were employed. Results: Effects of stigma on physical and mental health were significant. Perceived stigma was associated with additional 2.79 poor physical health days (β=2.79, confidence interval [CI]=1.84-3.75) and 2.92 more days of poor mental health (β=2.92, CI=1.97-3.86). Moreover, perceived stigma in health care settings was associated with 61% higher odds of reporting a depressive disorder (adjusted odds ratio=1.61, CI=1.29-2.00). Among other findings, individuals who were married, younger, had higher income, had college degrees, and were employed reported significantly fewer poor physical and mental health days and had lower odds of self-reported depressive disorder. Conclusions: Reducing stigma against people of color in health care settings (environments that should be pro-patient) must be a top priority for population health scholars and clinicians. Reducing perceived stigma in clinical settings may produce better mental and physical health outcomes in minority patients thereby reducing health disparities. In addition, fewer days lost to poor health could positively influence the health care system by decreasing utilization and may improve economic productivity through increasing days of good health.
Authors: Henna Budhwani; Ibrahim Yigit; Igho Ofotokun; Deborah J Konkle-Parker; Mardge H Cohen; Gina M Wingood; Lisa R Metsch; Adaora A Adimora; Tonya N Taylor; Tracey E Wilson; Sheri D Weiser; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Oluwakemi Sosanya; Stephen Gange; Seble Kassaye; Bulent Turan; Janet M Turan Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: C Ann Gakumo; Ibrahim Yigit; Henna Budhwani; Whitney S Rice; Faith E Fletcher; Samantha Whitfield; Shericia Ross; Deborah J Konkle-Parker; Mardge H Cohen; Gina M Wingood; Lisa R Metsch; Adaora A Adimora; Tonya N Taylor; Tracey E Wilson; Sheri D Weiser; Oluwakemi Sosanya; Lakshmi Goparaju; Stephen Gange; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Bulent Turan; Janet M Turan Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Lauren R Gullett; Dana M Alhasan; Symielle A Gaston; W Braxton Jackson; Ichiro Kawachi; Chandra L Jackson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Hailey W Bulls; Edward Chu; Burel R Goodin; Jane M Liebschutz; Antoinette Wozniak; Yael Schenker; Jessica S Merlin Journal: Pain Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Georgios K Nikolopoulos; Magdalena Cerdá; Diana Rossi; Ashly E Jordan; Tarlise Townsend; Maria R Khan; David C Perlman Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2021-04-11