| Literature DB >> 30914862 |
Raheleh Hashemi Habybabady1, Seyed Bagher Mortazavi2, Ali Khavanin2, Ramazan Mirzaei3, Mohammad Reza Arab4, Behzad Mesbahzadeh5, Mehran Hoseini6, Mahdi Mohammadi7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Noise exposure causes loss of cochlea hair cells, leading to permanent sensorineural hearing loss, and initiates pathological changes to the bipolar primary auditory neurons (ANs). This study focuses on the effects of N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) in protecting the density of spiral ganglion cells and in histological changes induced by continuous noise exposure in rats.Entities:
Keywords: N-acetyl-l-cysteine; cochlea; hearing loss; histology; noise; spiral ganglion cells
Year: 2018 PMID: 30914862 PMCID: PMC6419893 DOI: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.5.5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malays J Med Sci ISSN: 1394-195X
Figure 1Schematic experimental protocol of noise exposure and NAC injections
Figure 2A–D show SGC density in histological examination in the Sham (A), NAC (B), Noise (C), and NoiseNAC (D) groups. In the Sham and NAC groups, Rosenthal’s canal was densely packed with SGCs and fascicles of auditory nerve fibres (A–B). In the Noise group, the density of SGCs was reduced considerably in the lower basal turn area (C). NAC administration in NoiseNAC group replenished reduced SGCs density after noise exposure (D). Arrows and arrowheads indicate SGCs and auditory fibres, respectively
Comparison of mean density between all groups in terms of turns
| Turns | Groups | Density (cell/10000μm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Basal | Sham | 6 | 28.28 (5.72) | 21.32 (3, 20) | < 0.001 |
| NAC | 6 | 28.21 (3.20) | |||
| Noise | 6 | 12.78 (3.57) | |||
| NoiseNAC | 6 | 17.76 (3.48) | |||
| Upper Basal | Sham | 6 | 20.65 (3.62) | 2.64 (3, 20) | 0.077 |
| NAC | 6 | 20.57 (2.70) | |||
| Noise | 6 | 17.07 (1.52) | |||
| NoiseNAC | 6 | 19.04 (1.70) | |||
| Lower middle | Sham | 6 | 24.31 (3.10) | 2.09 (3, 20) | 0.134 |
| NAC | 6 | 23.33 (3.47) | |||
| Noise | 6 | 19.11 (2.29) | |||
| NoiseNAC | 6 | 22.35 (5.62) | |||
| Upper middle | Sham | 6 | 25.8 (5.10) | 3.08 (3, 20) | 0.051 |
| NAC | 6 | 24.30 (6.10) | |||
| Noise | 6 | 19.26 (1.00) | |||
| NoiseNAC | 6 | 21.66 (0.95) |
One way ANOVA,
According to post-hoc Tukey HSD test, no significant difference between the Sham and NAC groups (P = 0.98) was found.
There was a significant difference between the Sham and NAC with Noise and NoiseNAC (P < 0.001). The Noise and NoiseNAC groups were also significantly different (P = 0.046)
Figure 3Histological examination showing appearance and histology of OC, TM, and STV in the lower basal (LB), upper basal (UB), lower middle (LM), upper middle (UM), and apical turns of the cochlea in the Sham and NAC groups
Figure 4Histological examination showing normal appearance and histology of cochlea in the Sham and NAC groups (A–B), disorganised architecture of OHCs and outer phalangeal (OP) cells and disappearance of IHCs in the Noise group (C), decrease in TM height and normal appearance of OHCs, IHCs, and OPs in the NoiseNAC group (D)