| Literature DB >> 30914713 |
Y C Shao1, N G Deshpande2, Y Y Chin3, S H Hsieh1, C H Du1, H T Wang4, J W Chiou5, H M Tsai6, H J Lin6, S L Cheng7, J G Lin7, K Asokan8, P H Yeh1, W F Pong9.
Abstract
This study probes the temperature-dependent strain that is strongly correlated with the orbital and magnetic structures of epitaxial films of Nd0.35Sr0.65MnO3 (NSMO) that are fabricated by pulsed laser deposition with two thicknesses, 17 (NS17) and 103 nm (NS103) on SrTiO3 (STO) substrate. This investigation is probed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and absorption-based techniques, X-ray linear dichroism (XLD) and the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD). XRD indicates a significant shift in the (004) peak position that is associated with larger strain in NS17 relative to that of NS103 at both 30 and 300 K. Experimental and atomic multiplet simulated temperature-dependent Mn L3,2-edge XLD results reveal that the stronger strain in a thinner NS17 film causes less splitting of Mn 3d eg state at low temperature, indicating an enhancement of orbital fluctuations in the band above the Fermi level. This greater Mn 3d orbital fluctuation can be the cause of both the enhanced ferromagnetism (FM) as a result of spin moments and the reduced Néel temperature of C-type antiferromagnetism (AFM) in NS17, leading to the FM coupling of the canted-antiferromagnetism (FM-cAFM) state in NSMO/STO epitaxial films at low temperature (T = 30 K). These findings are also confirmed by Mn L3,2-edge XMCD measurements.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30914713 PMCID: PMC6435741 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41433-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a,b) The TEM images show the cross-sectional structure of NSMO/STO of NS17 and NS103, respectively. The scale bar is 5 and 20 nm for (a,b). Insets of (a,b) magnify the interfacial structure of TEM image of NS17 and NS103, respectively. Both scale bars are 2 nm. (c,d) The elements line-scan data obtained for NS17 and NS103, respectively.
Figure 2(a) The XRD (112) and (004) Bragg peaks of NS17 and NS103 samples at 300 and 30 K. Inset displays (002) and (022) Bragg peaks of STO substrate at 300 and 30 K. (b) Atomic structure of bulk-NSMO in a tetragonal unit cell. (c) Schematic NSMO unit cell that is rotated by 450 around -axis and deposited on STO substrate.
Figure 3(a) Plot of lattice parameter on plane as a function of temperature for NS17 and NS103 samples; lattice parameter of bulk-NSMO shown for comparison. (b) Plot of lattice parameter as a function of temperature for NS17 and NS103 samples; lattice parameter of bulk-NSMO shown for comparison. (c) Plot of lattice mismatch [f (T) and f(T)] as a function of temperature for NS17 and NS103 samples. (d) Magnetization versus temperature (M-T) for NS17 and NS103. Inset plots resistivity versus temperature (ρ-T) for NS17 and NS103 samples. (e) M-H hysteresis curve for NS17 and NS103. Inset plots M-H curves with range of interest for the hysteresis loop.
Figure 4(a) Normalized Mn L3,2-edge XANES spectra of NS17 and NS103 samples at two angles of incidence [θ = 00 and 700], at 300 and 30 K. Results for bulk MnO, Mn2O3 and MnO2 at 300 K are shown for reference. Bottom panels display corresponding XLD spectra. (b–e) Comparative plot of experimental results and simulated results for NS17 and NS103 samples obtained using atomic multiplet simulation at 30 and 300 K, respectively.
Parameters used in atomic multiplet simulations (in units of eV).
| Sample | Temp.(tilted angle | ∆eg | ∆t2g | U | U | ∆ | 10 | Hex | Occ.ratio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mn3+ | Mn4+ | Mn3+ | Mn4+ | Mn3+ | Mn4+ | Mn3+ | Mn4+ | Mn3+ | Mn4+ | Mn3+ | Mn4+ | ||||
| NS17 | 300 K (tilted 10.96°) | −0.005 | −0.150 | −0.001 | 0.050 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | −3.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 | X | 99.6% |
| 30 ± 2 K (tilted 12.17°) | −0.005 | −0.160 | −0.001 | 0.050 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | −3.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.0048 (1,1,0.1) | 97.6% | |
| NS103 | 300 K (tilted 9.24°) | 0.016 | −0.250 | 0.002 | 0.020 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | −3.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 | X | 103.7% |
| 30 ± 2 K (tilted 11.69°) | 0.005 | −0.400 | 0.000 | 0.020 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | −3.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.0036 (1,1,0.5) | 107.2% | |
The parameters in the atomicmultiplet calculation for comparing experimental XLD results at both 300 and 30 K.
Although the XLD signal is theoretically caused by Mn3+ ions, the Mn4+ ions in the samples herein are expected not to contribute significantly to the orbital anisotropy, but Mn4+ ions must be also considered in the XANES calculation. The relevant parameters areas follow.
The tilted angle against -axis is estimated from XRD results. ∆eg denotes the energy splitting between two eg states (d3z2−r2 and dx2−y2). ∆t2gis the energy splitting between t2g states (dxy, dyz and dxz). U is the correlation energy (Coulomb repulsion) between two 3d-electrons.U is the interactions between the 3d valence electron and the core-hole Mn (U). ∆ is the charge transfer energy, which is the energy difference between the (centers of the) 3dn and the 3dn+1 configurations ( is the ligand state). 10Dq is the crystal field parameter. Hex is the exchange energy. Occ. Ratio (occupation ratio) is here defined as the ratio between the occupation of d3z2−r2 and dx2−y2 orbitals, where the occupation value of each eg state is obtained theoretically.
Figure 5(a,b) Normalized Mn L3,2-edge XANES spectra of NS17 and NS103 samples with photo-helicity of incident x-rays parallel (μ+) and anti-parallel (μ−) todirection of magnetization at two temperatures (300 and 30 K) with angle of incidence θ = 300 in a magnetic field of 1 T applied parallel to surface of sample. Bottom panels display corresponding XMCD spectra. (c) Ti L3,2-edge XANES spectra with photo-helicity of incident X-rays parallel (μ+) and anti-parallel (μ−) to direction of magnetization for NS17 sample at 300 and 30 K.