Literature DB >> 30914327

Emergent Laparoscopic Removal of a Perforating Intrauterine Device During Pregnancy Under Regional Anesthesia.

Pierluigi Giampaolino1, Luigi Della Corte2, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo3, Brunella Zizolfi1, Alfonso Manzi2, Carlo De Angelis4, Giuseppe Bifulco2, Josè Carugno5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To describe and demonstrate a technique for laparoscopic removal of a perforating intrauterine device (IUD) during pregnancy, and to provide tips to facilitate safe laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy.
DESIGN: Video presentation of the technique for laparoscopic removal of a perforating IUD in a pregnant woman.
SETTING: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences, and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. INTERVENTION: A 30-year-old woman, gravida 3, para 2, with a copper T IUD (Nova T 380; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) perforating the left adnexa presented to the emergency room complaining of left lower quadrant pain. The patient had the IUD inserted by her gynecologist 3 months before the onset of the symptoms. Ultrasound revealed a 6-week intrauterine pregnancy with the presence of fetal cardiac activity along with the IUD perforating the left adnexa. The patient returned at 11 weeks of gestation complaining of worsening abdominal pain and excruciating left lower quadrant pain. She was scheduled for laparoscopic excision of the perforating IUD [1-3]. Considering her pregnancy, laparoscopy under regional anesthesia was performed in the minimal Trendelenburg position at 12 degrees, through open laparoscopic access [4]. Intra-abdominal pressure of 8 mmHg and ultrasound energy to cut and coagulate, avoiding monopolar/bipolar energy owing to the presence of a copper IUD, were used. The IUD and tube were extracted in an endobag through umbilical access, under a 5-mm, 0-degree telescope in left lateral access [5]. The procedure was carried out uneventfully, and the IUD was removed. Fetal viability was confirmed after the procedure. At the time of this report, the patient was in the 23rd week of gestation, and the pregnancy was progressing without any problems.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic removal of perforated IUD during pregnancy under regional anesthesia is a feasible and safe option that should be considered when needed.
Copyright © 2019 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IUD perforation; Laparoscopy; Pregnancy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30914327     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  3 in total

Review 1.  Ultra-minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marco La Verde; Gaetano Riemma; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-04-02

2.  Removal of a Giant Cyst of the Left Ovary from a Pregnant Woman in the First Trimester by Laparoscopic Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Attila Louis Major; Kudrat Jumaniyazov; Shahnoza Yusupova; Ruslan Jabbarov; Olimjon Saidmamatov; Ivanna Mayboroda-Major
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-13

Review 3.  Isolated Tubal Torsion in a Term Pregnancy: Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature of the Last 10 Years.

Authors:  Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Carla Ettore; Gianfranco Morreale; Stefano Siringo; Emanuele Russo; Marco D'Asta; Francesco Cannone; Giuseppe Ettore
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.