| Literature DB >> 30913548 |
Charline Daval1, Laurent Faroux, François Lesaffre, Thierry Blanpain, Jean-Pierre Chabert, Angeline Martin, Mathias Guinot, Nicolas Luconi, Madeline Espinosa, Pierre Nazeyrollas, Christophe Tourneux, Damien Metz.
Abstract
Cardiologists are among the health professionals that are most exposed to ionizing radiation, but there is no recent study quantifying overexposure of physicians during cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) procedures compared to 'classical' implantation of pacemakers (PMs) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). We aimed to measure and compare operator exposure to radiation during implantation of PM and ICD with or without CRT. The study population comprised all PMs and ICDs implanted in a large referral centre over a six months period. The endpoint was operator radiation exposure, assessed using a personal electronic dosimeter located on operator's chest. In total, 169 PM/ICD implantations were analysed, 19 of which included CRT. Compared with 'classical' implantation, cardiologist radiation exposure was 9-fold greater during CRT procedures (p < 0.001). Physician exposure was related to dose-area product (R2 = 0.21 during 'classical' implantations and R2 = 0.57 during CRT procedures). Our study shows that cardiologists' exposure to radiation during CRT implantation was 9-fold greater than during procedures without CRT.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30913548 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab1377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radiol Prot ISSN: 0952-4746 Impact factor: 1.394