Literature DB >> 30913299

Failure Patterns of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation in Young Patients.

David J Stockton, Karan Dua, Peter J O'Brien, Andrew N Pollak, C Max Hoshino, Gerard P Slobogean.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to describe the failure patterns of femoral neck fracture fixation in young patients. The secondary purpose was to determine if pattern of failure varies by type of implant. Adult patients (age range, 18-55 years) who experienced a "fixation failure" following internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture were identified from 5 level 1 trauma centers. Failure was defined by screw cutout, implant breakage, varus collapse (<120° neck-shaft angle), or severe fracture shortening (≥1 cm). When multiple complications were identified, mechanical failures were preferentially noted for the analysis. Failure patterns were compared between patients who received multiple cancellous screws and patients who received a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw. Severe fracture shortening was the most common complication identified (61%). No differences in the incidence of severe shortening (P=.750) or implant breakage (P=1.000) were detected between the fixation groups. However, among the failures with a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw construct, a greater portion were related to screw cutout (38% for a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw vs 7% for screws, P=.019). Failures with multiple screws were associated with varus collapse (25% for screws vs 0% for a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw, P=.037). Severe shortening was the most common fixation failure. Sliding hip screw plus derotation screw implants were associated with screw cutout. Multiple cancellous screw implants failed by varus collapse. Selecting a surgical implant based on its likely failure pattern may allow surgeons to minimize the severity of failure or the need for secondary conversion to hip arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):e376-e380.]. Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30913299     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20190321-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  [Comparison of femoral neck system and inverted triangle cannulated screws fixations in treatment of Pauwels typle femoral neck fractures].

Authors:  Jiazhao Yang; Xuefeng Zhou; Li Li; Lei Xu; Wanbo Zhu; Wei Xu; Rui Xia; Xujin Wang; Gang Wang; Xingyi Hua; Xinzhong Xu; Shiyuan Fang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 2.  Does the femoral neck system provide better outcomes compared to cannulated screws fixation for the management of femoral neck fracture in young adults? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Kumar Rajnish; Amit Srivastava; Pratik M Rathod; Rehan Ul Haq; Sameer Aggarwal; Prasoon Kumar; Ish Kumar Dhammi; Ankit Dadra
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients.

Authors:  Jingbo Cheng; Mingli Feng; Huaijian Hu; Zhihua Gao; Jingwei Wu; Shibao Lu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Influence of the proximal screws of buttress plates on the stability of vertical femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shi Zhan; Dajun Jiang; Jian Xu; Ming Ling; Kai Yang; Yuehua Li; Weitao Jia; Hai Hu; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The Effect on the Fracture Healing following Femoral Neck Shortening after Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fracture Treated with Internal Fixation: Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Yu; Peng-Ze Rong; Qing-Jiang Pang; Xian-Jun Chen; Lin Shi; Cheng-Hao Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A quantitative biomechanical study of positive buttress techniques for femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Bin Wang; Yong Tang; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.