Literature DB >> 30913193

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774 Summary: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.

.   

Abstract

Opportunistic salpingectomy may offer obstetrician-gynecologists and other health care providers the opportunity to decrease the risk of ovarian cancer in their patients who are already undergoing pelvic surgery for benign disease. By performing salpingectomy when patients undergo an operation during which the fallopian tubes could be removed in addition to the primary surgical procedure (eg, hysterectomy), the risk of ovarian cancer is reduced. Although opportunistic salpingectomy offers the opportunity to significantly decrease the risk of ovarian cancer, it does not eliminate the risk of ovarian cancer entirely. Counseling women who are undergoing routine pelvic surgery about the risks and benefits of salpingectomy should include an informed consent discussion about the role of oophorectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy that causes surgical menopause reduces the risk of ovarian cancer but may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer other than ovarian cancer, osteoporosis, cognitive impairment, and all-cause mortality. Salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy or as a means of tubal sterilization appears to be safe and does not increase the risk of complications such as blood transfusions, readmissions, postoperative complications, infections, or fever compared with hysterectomy alone or tubal ligation. The risks and benefits of salpingectomy should be discussed with patients who desire permanent sterilization. Additionally, ovarian function does not appear to be affected by salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy based on surrogate serum markers or response to in vitro fertilization. Plans to perform an opportunistic salpingectomy should not alter the intended route of hysterectomy. Obstetrician-gynecologists should continue to observe and practice minimally invasive techniques. This Committee Opinion has been updated to include new information on the benefit of salpingectomy for cancer reduction, the feasibility of salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy, and long-term follow-up of women after salpingectomy.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30913193     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Society of gynecologic oncology future of physician payment reform task force: Lessons learned in developing and implementing surgical alternative payment models.

Authors:  Margaret I Liang; Emeline M Aviki; Jason D Wright; Laura J Havrilesky; Leslie R Boyd; Haley A Moss; Elizabeth L Jewell; David E Cohn; Sachin M Apte; Patrick F Timmins; Ronald D Alvarez; Jill Rathbun; Elizabeth Lipinski; Susan White; Dorimar Siverio-Minardi; Emily M Ko
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Primary Fallopian Tube Carcinoma Presenting with a Massive Inguinal Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Michihide Maeda; Tsuyoshi Hisa; Shinya Matsuzaki; Shuichi Ohe; Shigenori Nagata; Misooja Lee; Seiji Mabuchi; Shoji Kamiura
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laleh Loghmani; Nafise Saedi; Reza Omani-Samani; Saeid Safiri; Mahdi Sepidarkish; Saman Maroufizadeh; Arezoo Esmailzadeh; Maryam Shokrpour; Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae; Amir Almasi-Hashiani
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.