Literature DB >> 3091297

The preoperative and postoperative investigation of TSH and prolactin release in the management of patients with hyperprolactinaemia due to prolactinomas and nonfunctional pituitary tumours: relationship to adenoma size at surgery.

M F Scanlon, J R Peters, J Salvador, S H Richards, R John, S Howell, E D Williams, J P Thomas, R Hall.   

Abstract

We report here our results of the pre- and post-operative assessment of prolactin and TSH status in 41 hyperprolactinaemic patients who underwent pituitary surgery over a 5 year period. Preoperatively in patients with prolactinomas (n = 33) the TSH response to domperidone decreased with increasing adenoma size. When the data are expressed on a group mean basis the exaggerated TSH response to domperidone in preoperative prolactinoma patients was reduced significantly in patients rendered normoprolactinaemic by surgery but persisted in those who remained hyperprolactinaemic. Similarly the reduced preoperative PRL responses to domperidone and TRH were significantly increased by successful surgery. In contrast patients with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia (n = 6) due to larger lesions which were not prolactinomas all showed reduced or absent TSH responses to domperidone. The PRL responses to domperidone and TRH were reduced or absent both in patients with prolactinomas and in those with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia. All patients with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia showed a delayed pattern of TSH response to TRH with 60 min values being greater than 20 min ones. In contrast a normal pattern of TSH response to TRH was observed in all patients with hyperprolactinaemia due to prolactinomas. Postoperatively TSH and PRL responses were largely unchanged in patients with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia regardless of whether normoprolactinaemia was restored by surgery. In conclusion a reduced or absent PRL response to TRH or domperidone is not diagnostic of the presence of a prolactinoma since it occurs in hyperprolactinaemic patients with prolactinomas or stalk-compression. In contrast, the TSH response to acute dopamine antagonism is exaggerated in most patients with small prolactinomas but not in those with stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia and we have found this to be helpful diagnostically since the presence of an exaggerated TSH response to dopamine antagonism is evidence against the presence of stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia. The observation of a delayed TSH response to TRH in a hyperprolactinaemic patient should alert the clinician to the possibility of stalk-compression hyperprolactinaemia due to a large lesion which may not be a prolactinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3091297     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1986.tb01649.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  4 in total

1.  Microprolactinoma: medical or surgical treatment as first line approach? The case for medical therapy.

Authors:  D A Rees; J S Davies; M F Scanlon
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Hyperprolactinemia: neuroendocrine and diagnostic aspects.

Authors:  F Camanni; E Ciccarelli; E Ghigo; E E Müller
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Control of prolactin secretion.

Authors:  G Benker; C Jaspers; G Häusler; D Reinwein
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-12-04

Review 4.  Current management of prolactinomas.

Authors:  P Nomikos; M Buchfelder; R Fahlbusch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.130

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.