| Literature DB >> 30912339 |
Sang Ouk Chin1, Cheol Ryong Ku2, Byung Joon Kim3, Sung Woon Kim1, Kyeong Hye Park4, Kee Ho Song5, Seungjoon Oh1, Hyun Koo Yoon6, Eun Jig Lee2, Jung Min Lee7, Jung Soo Lim8, Jung Hee Kim9, Kwang Joon Kim10, Heung Yong Jin11, Dae Jung Kim12, Kyung Ae Lee11, Seong Su Moon13, Dong Jun Lim7, Dong Yeob Shin2, Se Hwa Kim14, Min Jeong Kwon15, Ha Young Kim16, Jin Hwa Kim17, Dong Sun Kim18, Chong Hwa Kim19.
Abstract
The Korean Endocrine Society (KES) published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acromegaly in 2011. Since then, the number of acromegaly cases, publications on studies addressing medical treatment of acromegaly, and demands for improvements in insurance coverage have been dramatically increasing. In 2017, the KES Committee of Health Insurance decided to publish a position statement regarding the use of somatostatin analogues in acromegaly. Accordingly, consensus opinions for the position statement were collected after intensive review of the relevant literature and discussions among experts affiliated with the KES, and the Korean Neuroendocrine Study Group. This position statement includes the characteristics, indications, dose, interval (including extended dose interval in case of lanreotide autogel), switching and preoperative use of somatostatin analogues in medical treatment of acromegaly. The recommended approach is based on the expert opinions in case of insufficient clinical evidence, and where discrepancies among the expert opinions were found, the experts voted to determine the recommended approach.Entities:
Keywords: Acromegaly; Lanreotide; Octreotide; Pasireotide; Somatostatin analogues
Year: 2019 PMID: 30912339 PMCID: PMC6435847 DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2019.34.1.53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) ISSN: 2093-596X
Definition of Recommendation Levels
| Recommendation level | Definition |
|---|---|
| A | When there is a clear rationale for the recommendations: |
| When manifold randomized controlled trials that can be generalized because they have sufficient test or meta-analysis results support a recommendation | |
| B | When there is a reliable basis for the recommendations: |
| When reasonable grounds support this through well-performed cohort studies or patient—control group studies | |
| C | When there is a possible basis for the recommendations: |
| When relevant grounds are seen through randomized clinical studies or case reports and observational studies carried out in a small institution, despite their inherent unreliability | |
| E | Expert recommendations: |
| There is no basis to support the recommendations, but they are supported by expert opinion or expert clinical experience |
Fig. 1Initial dose and up-/down-titration of octreotide long-acting release (LAR) and lanreotide autogel (ATG) in patients with acromegaly. SSA, somatostatin analogues; OCT, octreotide; LAN, lanreotide; GH, growth hormone.
Fig. 2Switching between octreotide long-acting release (LAR) and lanreotide autogel (ATG) during the medical treatment of acromegaly.