| Literature DB >> 30912296 |
Ahmad I M Al-Shafei1,2,3, Ola A A El-Gendy3,4.
Abstract
This study characterized the effects of regular green tea (GT) and hot water (HW) ingestion on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in two equal, sex- and age-matched groups; Grp1 and Grp2 (n = 100 each; age 53 ± 4 years) of hypertensive patients. Grp1 had regular GT treatment, followed by HW ingestion, whereas Grp2 had HW ingestion followed by GT treatment for periods of 4 months each. Electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic assessments of LVH were made before and at the end of both periods. SBP was lowered significantly by 6.6%; DBP by 5.1%, and PP by 9.1% by the end of month 4 of GT treatment in Grp1. Upon GT cessation and HW ingestion, SBP, DBP, and PP returned to pretreatment levels over 4 months. In Grp2, SBP, DBP, and PP were reduced insignificantly by 1.5%, 1.0%, and 2.3% by the end of the 4th month of HW ingestion. Conversely, over 4 months of GT treatment, SBP, DBP, and PP were significantly lowered by 5.4%, 4.1%, and 7.7% from the baseline values, respectively. ECG and echocardiographic evidence of LVH was shown in 20% of Grp1 and 24% of Grp2 patients before intervention. This was significantly lowered to 8% and 10% in Grp1 and Grp2 by GT treatment. However, this increased to 16% following HW ingestion in Grp1. HW ingestion did mot induce regression of LVH in Grp2. Thus, regular GT ingestion has cardiovascular protective effects.Entities:
Keywords: Green tea; hypertension; left ventricular hypertrophy; pulse pressure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30912296 PMCID: PMC6434072 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1Effects of GT treatment and HW ingestion on SBP, DBP, and PP (mmHg). Changes in SBP, DBP, and PP for Grp1(1A) and Grp2 (1B) following two periods of GT and HW intervention for 4 months each; Grp1 had GT treatment followed by HW ingestion and Grp2 had HW ingestion followed by GT treatment. During each intervention period, patient were instructed to drink either four standard cups (250 mL each) of GT or HW per day for 4 months from left to right in sequence. 1GT/1HW indicates 1 month after regular GT or HW ingestion; 2GT/2HW indicates 2 month after regular GT or HW ingestion; 3GT/3HW indicates 3 month after regular GT or HW ingestion; 4GT/4HW indicates 4 month after regular GT or HW ingestion. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations from the means (SD). One‐way analysis of variance (one‐way ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test were used to analyze changes in the measured parameters; aaa P < 0.001, aa P < 0.01 and a P < 0.05 (comparing values by the end of each month of the 8‐month study period with the baseline value); bbb P < 0.001, bb P < 0.01, and b P < 0.05 (comparing values after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th months of the second period of intervention with the level by the end of the 4th month of the first period of intervention).
Figure 2Effects of GT treatment and HW ingestion on HR (beat/min; bpm). Changes in Heart rate for Grp1(2A) and Grp2 (2B) following two periods of GT and HW intervention for 4 months each; Grp1 had GT treatment followed by HW ingestion and Grp2 had HW ingestion followed by GT treatment. During each intervention period, patient were instructed to drink either 4 standard cups (250 mL each) of GT or HW per day for 4 months from left to right in sequence. 1GT/1HW indicates 1 month after regular GT or HW ingestion; 2GT/2HW indicates 2 month after regular GT or HW ingestion; 3GT/3HW indicates 3 month after regular GT or HW ingestion; 4GT/4HW indicates 4 month after regular GT or HW ingestion. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations from the means (SD). One‐way analysis of variance (one‐way ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test were used to analyze changes in the measured parameters; aa P < 0.01 and a P < 0.05 (comparing values by the end of each month of the 8‐month study period with the baseline value); bb P < 0.01 and b P < 0.05 (comparing values after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th months of the second period of intervention with the level by the end of the 4th month of the first period of intervention).
Effects of GT treatment and HW ingestion on electrocardiographic and echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)
| Grp1 (n = 100) | Grp2 (n = 100) | |
|---|---|---|
| No of cases with LVH at the beginning of the study (baseline LVH) | 20 (20%) | 24 (24%) |
| No of cases with LVH by the end of the first intervention period | 8 (8%) | 24 (24%) |
| No of cases with LVH by the end of the second intervention period | 16 (16%) | 10 (10%) |
Data are presented as number of cases having LVH at the beginning of the study (baseline LVH), and by the end of the first and second intervention periods. Comparison used the Fisher's exact test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (comparing LVH by the end of the first intervention period with baseline LVH); + P < 0.05, ++ P < 0.01 (comparing LVH by the end of the second intervention period with LVH by the end of the first intervention period); § P < 0.05, §§ P < 0.01 (comparing LVH by the end of the second intervention period with baseline LVH).