Literature DB >> 30911812

Utility of the EORTC risk tables and CUETO scoring model for predicting recurrence and progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with routine second transurethral resection.

Guoxian Zhang1, Daniel Steinbach2, Marc-Oliver Grimm2, Marcus Horstmann2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Routine second transurethral resection (TUR) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is common practice in Germany. Applicability of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Spanish Urological Club for Oncological Treatment (CUETO) models in NMIBC patients is still controversial. Aim of the study was to assess the performance of EORTC and CUETO predictive models in NMIBC patients treated with second TUR.
METHODS: 479 NMIBC patients with routine second TUR were analyzed retrospectively between 2003 and 2011, and investigated with clinical and pathological variables in regard to tumor recurrence and progression. Furthermore, recurrencefree survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated according to EORTC and CUETO, and the discrimination of the models assessed.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 60 months, prior recurrence rate, grade, and second TUR pathology were independent prognostic factors for the risk of disease recurrence and progression. The concordance index of the EORTC and the CUETO model was 0.563 and 0.516 for recurrence and 0.681 and 0.702 for progression, respectively. The positive pathology after second TUR was significantly associated with risk of disease recurrence and progression. EORTC and CUETO risk models estimated progression better than recurrence, especially with higherscore groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved predictive tools should be developed for optimal treatment selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; CUETO; EORTC; Progression; Recurrence; Second TUR

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30911812     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02681-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  18 in total

1.  Second resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: current role and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marko Babjuk
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Molecular markers in bladder cancer: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  Clinical value of transurethral second resection of bladder tumor: systematic review.

Authors:  Jakub Dobruch; Andrzej Borówka; Harry W Herr
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016.

Authors:  Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; Eva M Compérat; Virginia Hernández; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Morgan Rouprêt; Bas W G van Rhijn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Viktor Soukup; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; James W F Catto; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Harry Herr; Pierre Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Carlo La Vecchia; Shahrokh Shariat; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials.

Authors:  Richard J Sylvester; Adrian P M van der Meijden; Willem Oosterlinck; J Alfred Witjes; Christian Bouffioux; Louis Denis; Donald W W Newling; Karlheinz Kurth
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Predicting Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrence and Progression in a United States Population.

Authors:  Kourosh Ravvaz; Marcus E Walz; John A Weissert; Tracy M Downs
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Predicting recurrence and progression in Chinese patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer using EORTC and CUETO scoring models.

Authors:  Tianyuan Xu; Zhaowei Zhu; Xiaohua Zhang; Xianjin Wang; Shan Zhong; Minguang Zhang; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Risk prediction scores for recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: an international validation in primary tumours.

Authors:  Moniek M Vedder; Mirari Márquez; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Malu L Calle; Lars Dyrskjøt; Manoils Kogevinas; Ulrika Segersten; Per-Uno Malmström; Ferran Algaba; Willemien Beukers; Torben F Ørntoft; Ellen Zwarthoff; Francisco X Real; Nuria Malats; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs?

Authors:  K D Sievert; B Amend; U Nagele; D Schilling; J Bedke; M Horstmann; J Hennenlotter; S Kruck; A Stenzl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  2 in total

1.  Validation of EORTC, CUETO, and EAU risk stratification in prediction of recurrence, progression, and death of patients with initially non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): A cohort analysis.

Authors:  Mateusz Jobczyk; Konrad Stawiski; Wojciech Fendler; Waldemar Różański
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.452

2.  Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity as Risk Factors for Bladder Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Lu; Jing Tao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.555

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.