| Literature DB >> 30911543 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30911543 PMCID: PMC6399562 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4563484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flow diagram of literature research results.
Descriptive statistics for studies used in the systematic review.
| Description | N (%) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| United States of America (USA) | 23 (53.5) |
| United Kingdom (UK) | 4 (9.3) |
| Spain | 4 (9.3) |
| Finland | 2 (4.7) |
| Hong Kong | 2 (4.7) |
| Other country | 8 (18.6) |
|
| |
| <100 | 6 (14.0) |
| 100-249 | 21 (48.8) |
| 250-500 | 9 (20.9) |
| >500 | 7 (16.3) |
|
| |
| Questionnaires | 2 (4.7) |
| Observed/SOFIT | 8 (18.6) |
| HR monitor | 10 (23.3) |
| Pedometers | 10 (23.3) |
| Accelerometer | 13 (30.2) |
|
| |
| Univariate analysis | 37 (86.0) |
| Multivariate analysis | 20 (46.5) |
|
| |
| = median score 4 | 21 (48.8) |
| >median score 4 | 22 (51.2) |
|
| |
| Demographic/biological variables | 23 (53.5) |
| Instruction-related variables | 21 (48.8) |
| School physical environment variables | 9 (20.9) |
| Psychological variables | 16 (37.2) |
Summary of studies of correlates of MVPA during secondary school PE lessons.
| Correlates variables | Related to MVPA | Unrelated to MVPA | Summary code | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| References No | Asso (−/+) | Asso | % Studies | ||
|
| |||||
| Sex (boys) | [ | + | [ | + + | 12/16 75% |
| [ | − | ||||
| School level (high school) | [ | + | [ | 0 | 1/3 33% |
| [ | − | ||||
| Grade | [ | − | [ | ? | 4/8 50% |
| [ | + | ||||
| BMI (overweight) | [ | − | [ | 0 | 1/5 20% |
| Skill level (high) | [ | + | ND | ||
| Cardiorespiratory fitness(healthy) | [ | + | ND | ||
| Ethnicity (White) | [ | + | + + | 3/3 100% | |
|
| |||||
| Class size | [ | + | [ | 0 | 2/8 25% |
| [ | − | ||||
| Class gender | |||||
| Boys-only | [ | + | + + | 5/5 100% | |
| Co-educational | [ | + | [ | ? | 2/5 40% |
| [ | − | ||||
| Girls-only | [ | − | − − | 6/6 100% | |
| Lesson length | [ | − | [ | ND | |
| PE activities | |||||
| Team games | [ | + | [ | + + | 8/12 67% |
| [ | − | ||||
| Individual games | [ | + | [ | 0 | 2/10 20% |
| Movement activities | [ | − | [ | − − | 10/12 83% |
| Individual activities | [ | + | [ | 0 | 3/10 30% |
| [ | − | ||||
| Lesson context | |||||
| Fitness activities | [ | + | [ | ? | 3/7 43% |
| Free play | [ | 0 | 0/7 0% | ||
| Game play | [ | + | [ | ? | 3/7 43% |
| Skill drills | [ | + | [ | 0 | 2/7 29% |
| Management | [ | − | [ | 0 | 1/7 14% |
| Knowledge | [ | − | [ | − − | 5/7 71% |
| Teacher gender (male) | [ | 0 | 0/3 0% | ||
| Teacher experience | [ | − | ND | ||
| Teacher type (PE specialist) | [ | ND | |||
| Teacher behavior | |||||
| Fitness promotion | [ | ND | |||
| Fitness demonstration | [ | ND | |||
| General instruction | [ | − | ND | ||
| Observation | [ | + | ND | ||
| Class management | [ | ND | |||
| Other tasks | [ | ND | |||
|
| |||||
| Lesson location (outdoors) | [ | + | [ | + + | 4/6 67% |
| Accessibility of facilities/equipment | [ | + | ND | ||
| Large Space | [ | + | [ | ND | |
| Natural environment (Fall) | [ | + | [ | ND | |
| School structure quality | [ | ND | |||
| School structure quantity | [ | ND | |||
|
| |||||
| Self-determined motivation | [ | + | ND | ||
| Autonomous motivation | [ | + | ND | ||
| Controlled motivation | [ | ND | |||
| Intrinsic motivation | [ | + | [ | 0 | 1/3 33% |
| Identified regulation | [ | 0 | 0/3 0% | ||
| Introjected regulation | [ | ND | |||
| External regulation | [ | − | [ | 0 | 1/3 33% |
| Amotivation | [ | − | [ | 0 | 1/4 25% |
| Competence | [ | + | [ | 0 | 1/4 25% |
| Autonomy | [ | + | [ | ND | |
| Relatedness | [ | + | [ | ND | |
| Expectancy beliefs | [ | + | [ | + + | 2/3 67% |
| Subjective task values | [ | + | [ | + + | 3/4 75% |
| Achievement goals | [ | + | ND | ||
| Self-efficacy | [ | + | [ | ? | 3/6 50% |
| Outcome expectancy | [ | + | ND | ||
| Enjoyment | [ | + | + + | 2/3 67% | |
| [ | − | ||||
Note: Asso = association.
Variables were coded as ‘no description (ND)' when reported less than three studies; when variables appear more than three times, 60%–100% of the association in a similar direction was coded as ‘+ +' (positive) or ‘− −' (negative); 34%–59% of the association in a similar direction was coded as ‘?' (indeterminate/inconsistent); 0%–33% of the association in a similar direction was coded as ‘0' (no association).