Literature DB >> 30911435

Feasibility of rapid integrated radiation therapy planning with follow-up FDG PET/CT to improve overall treatment assessment in head and neck cancer.

Rustain Morgan1, Bennett B Chin1, Ryan Lanning2.   

Abstract

Inflammatory changes and residual disease are difficult to distinguish after high dose, definitive radiotherapy of head and neck malignancies. FDG uptake located within a high dose field may more likely represent inflammatory changes, and FDG uptake outside of the radiation field could represent unsuspected and under treated disease. In situ knowledge of the precise radiotherapy fields, therefore, may be useful in distinguishing these etiologies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of rapid integration of radiation treatment field images during follow-up FDG PET/CT imaging. Twenty head and neck cancer patients who underwent radiation therapy were identified. A MIM based workflow was created which fused the radiation treatment CT, including the planning volumes and isodose curves, into the follow-up imaging. Two board certified physicians, blinded to treatment outcome, reviewed the follow-up exams, half with the treatment information and half without. Each exam was scored for recurrent or residual disease, confidence of the read and a qualitative assessment to the overall usefulness of the treatment plan. Interpretation accuracy improved from 80 to 90% with integration of the treatment plan. Similarly, the sensitivity improved from 71% to 86%, while the specificity increased from 85% to 92%. Confidence also increased by 0.7 on a 5 point scale for both readers. Data demonstrate the clinical feasibility of rapidly incorporating radiation treatment dosimetry into follow-up FDG PET/CT exams in patients with head and neck cancer. Preliminary results demonstrated a simple, efficient method which improved accuracy of interpretation and overall reader confidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG PET/CT; Radiation treatment planning; inflammation; tumor recurrence

Year:  2019        PMID: 30911435      PMCID: PMC6420709     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  M Unterrainer; C Eze; H Ilhan; S Marschner; O Roengvoraphoj; N S Schmidt-Hegemann; F Walter; W G Kunz; P Munck Af Rosenschöld; R Jeraj; N L Albert; A L Grosu; M Niyazi; P Bartenstein; C Belka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Differences among [18F]FDG PET-derived parameters in lung cancer produced by three software packages.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bos-Liedke; Paulina Cegla; Krzysztof Matuszewski; Ewelina Konstanty; Adam Piotrowski; Magdalena Gross; Julian Malicki; Maciej Kozak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Does a 6-point scale approach to post-treatment 18F-FDG PET-CT allow to improve response assessment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A multicenter study.

Authors:  P Bonomo; A Merlotti; S Morbelli; V Berti; C Saieva; F Bergesio; A Bacigalupo; L Belgioia; C Franzese; E Lopci; A Casolo; E D'Angelo; D Alterio; L Travaini; L Berretta; V Pirro; S Ursino; D Volterrani; M Roncali; F Vigo; S Cicchetti; F Scalone; G Belli; S Cauda; I Desideri; E Russi; L Livi; A Bianchi
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-05-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.