Literature DB >> 30910613

The central nervous system and muscular system play different roles for chill coma onset and recovery in insects.

Mads Kuhlmann Andersen1, Johannes Overgaard2.   

Abstract

When insects are cooled, they initially lose their ability to perform coordinated movements at their critical thermal minima (CTmin). At a slightly lower temperature, they enter a state of complete paralysis (chill coma onset temperature - CCO) and if they are returned to permissive temperatures they regain function after a recovery period which is termed chill coma recovery time (CCRT). These three phenotypes (CTmin, CCO, and CCRT) are all popular measures of insect cold tolerance and it is therefore important to characterize the physiological processes that are responsible for these phenotypes. In the present study we measured extracellular field potentials in the central nervous system (CNS) and muscle membrane potential (Vm) during cooling and recovery in three Drosophila species that have different cold tolerances. With these measurements we assess the role of the CNS and muscle Vm in setting the lower thermal limits (CTmin and CCO) and in delaying chill coma recovery (CCRT). The experiments suggest that entry into chill coma is primarily caused by the onset of a spreading depolarization in the CNS for all three species. In the two most cold-sensitive species we observed that the loss of CNS function was followed closely by a depolarization of muscle Vm which is known to compromise muscle function. When flies are returned to benign temperature after a cold exposure we observe a rapid recovery of CNS function, but functional recovery was delayed by a slower recovery of muscle polarization. Thus, we demonstrate the primacy of different physiological systems (CNS vs. muscle) as determinants of the most commonly used cold tolerance measures for insects (CTmin vs. CCRT).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT(min); Cold tolerance; Drosophila; Membrane potential; Spreading depolarization

Year:  2019        PMID: 30910613     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  6 in total

1.  Body mass and sex, not local climate, drive differences in chill coma recovery times in common garden reared bumble bees.

Authors:  K Jeannet Oyen; Laura E Jardine; Zachary M Parsons; James D Herndon; James P Strange; Jeffrey D Lozier; Michael E Dillon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Chill coma recovery of Ceratitis capitata adults across the Northern Hemisphere.

Authors:  Cleopatra A Moraiti; Eleni Verykouki; Nikos T Papadopoulos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  A lack of repeatability creates the illusion of a trade-off between basal and plastic cold tolerance.

Authors:  Erica O'Neill; Hannah E Davis; Heath A MacMillan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Intraspecific variation in thermal acclimation and tolerance between populations of the winter ant, Prenolepis imparis.

Authors:  Maria Adelena Tonione; So Mi Cho; Gary Richmond; Christian Irian; Neil Durie Tsutsui
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Temperature and livestock grazing trigger transcriptome responses in bumblebees along an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Kristof Brenzinger; Fabienne Maihoff; Marcell K Peters; Leonie Schimmer; Thorsten Bischler; Alice Classen
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-22

6.  Biogeographic parallels in thermal tolerance and gene expression variation under temperature stress in a widespread bumble bee.

Authors:  Meaghan L Pimsler; Kennan J Oyen; James D Herndon; Jason M Jackson; James P Strange; Michael E Dillon; Jeffrey D Lozier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.