Literature DB >> 30910457

Improved prognosis with induction chemotherapy in pathological complete responders after trimodality treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Hypothesis generating for adjuvant treatment.

Shao-Lun Lu1, Feng-Ming Hsu1, Chiao-Ling Tsai1, Jang-Ming Lee2, Pei-Ming Huang2, Chih-Hung Hsu3, Chia-Chi Lin3, Yih-Leong Chang4, Min-Shu Hsieh4, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the locations of recurrences and survival outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without preceding induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by esophagectomy.
METHODS: Among 276 patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing trimodality treatment during 2004-2014, 94 (34.1%) with pCR were eligible. The cohort included 26 patients undergoing IC before CCRT (IC group), and 68 patients who did not receive IC (non-IC group).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 51.4 months (95% confidence interval; 42.9-62.1), 19 patients experienced recurrences. There was a trend toward fewer distant failures in the IC group (0% vs.14.7%, p = 0.057), while locoregional recurrence was similar (7.7% vs. 7.4%). IC was associated with significantly improved survivals with the 5-year RFS and OS rates for the IC group of 85.1% and 90.5%, respectively, compared to of 46.2% and 48.1% for the non-IC group (p = 0.008 for RFS, and p = 0.015 for OS). By multivariable analyses, IC remained the only significant factor associated with survivals (HR:0.18 for RFS, p = 0.020 and HR:0.18 for OS, p = 0.025). The effect of IC in the whole cohort, irrespective of pathological response, was also assessed. Patients with non-pCR in the IC group had a trend toward worse survivals compared to the non-IC group
CONCLUSIONS: In ESCC patients with pCR after trimodality treatment, IC was associated with favorable survivals. The benefits of IC might be a hypothesis generation for adjuvant treatment for patients with pCR.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant treatment; Esophageal cancer; Induction chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Pathological complete response

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30910457     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  4 in total

1.  Pathologic complete response is not equivalent to cure in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Carr; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Pretreatment Primary Tumor Stage is a Risk Factor for Recurrence in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Achieve Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Roberta La Mendola; Maria Bencivenga; Lorena Torroni; Luca Alberti; Michele Sacco; Francesco Casella; Cecilia Ridolfi; Nicola Simoni; Renato Micera; Michele Pavarana; Giuseppe Verlato; Simone Giacopuzzi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Addition of Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Patients With Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jianing Wang; Linlin Xiao; Shuai Wang; Qingsong Pang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Pathologic Complete Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy in Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Evidence from Integrative Inflammatory and Nutritional Scores.

Authors:  Jifeng Feng; Liang Wang; Xun Yang; Qixun Chen; Xiangdong Cheng
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-07-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.