Reham Khresheh1, Lesley Barclay2. 1. Faculty of Nursing, Mutah University, Jordan. Electronic address: rehamkh@mutah.edu.jo. 2. School of Medicine, University Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, NSW Australia. Electronic address: lesley.barclay@sydney.edu.au.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Episiotomy is still performed routinely by clinicians in many countries. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge of, attitudes towards and experience of episiotomy practice among clinicians working in public hospitals in Jordan. METHODS: A cross-sectional study, using a self-administered survey questionnaire, was conducted among midwives and obstetricians in three public hospitals in Jordan. RESULTS: 112 (87.5%) clinicians responded to the questionnaire. Low knowledge level of evidence about overuse and risk of episiotomy was identified among participants with a significant difference among obstetricians and midwives (P<0.05). Results revealed that both obstetricians and midwives have limited access to evidence which is not emphasised in their learning, practice, or hospital policy. The majority of obstetricians (80%) and midwives (79%) thought an episiotomy rate of 81% is about right. The most common reason for performing episiotomy identified by both obstetricians (83.1%) and midwives (75.5%) was to reduce the risk of 3rd and 4th degree perineal laceration. The most common obstacle to reducing episiotomy rate reported by obstetricians (78.0%) was lack of training on preventing perineal tears, while the most common obstacles reported by midwives were insufficient time to wait for the perineum to stretch (56.6%) and difficulty changing the conventional practices in the labour ward (52.8%). CONCLUSION: This study identifies that obstetricians and midwives in Jordan rely on non evidence-based beliefs to guide their practice on performing an episiotomy. Training, continuing education, and developing evidence based clinical policies and guidelines for surgical procedures, such as in an episiotomy, are needed.
INTRODUCTION: Episiotomy is still performed routinely by clinicians in many countries. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge of, attitudes towards and experience of episiotomy practice among clinicians working in public hospitals in Jordan. METHODS: A cross-sectional study, using a self-administered survey questionnaire, was conducted among midwives and obstetricians in three public hospitals in Jordan. RESULTS: 112 (87.5%) clinicians responded to the questionnaire. Low knowledge level of evidence about overuse and risk of episiotomy was identified among participants with a significant difference among obstetricians and midwives (P<0.05). Results revealed that both obstetricians and midwives have limited access to evidence which is not emphasised in their learning, practice, or hospital policy. The majority of obstetricians (80%) and midwives (79%) thought an episiotomy rate of 81% is about right. The most common reason for performing episiotomy identified by both obstetricians (83.1%) and midwives (75.5%) was to reduce the risk of 3rd and 4th degree perineal laceration. The most common obstacle to reducing episiotomy rate reported by obstetricians (78.0%) was lack of training on preventing perineal tears, while the most common obstacles reported by midwives were insufficient time to wait for the perineum to stretch (56.6%) and difficulty changing the conventional practices in the labour ward (52.8%). CONCLUSION: This study identifies that obstetricians and midwives in Jordan rely on non evidence-based beliefs to guide their practice on performing an episiotomy. Training, continuing education, and developing evidence based clinical policies and guidelines for surgical procedures, such as in an episiotomy, are needed.