| Literature DB >> 30909972 |
Josephus J Fourie1, Alec Evans2, Michel Labuschagne3, Dionne Crafford3, Maxime Madder3, Matthias Pollmeier4, Bettina Schunack4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The interplay of speed of activity of acaricidal products and tick-borne pathogen transmission time is the major driver for disease prevention. This study aimed to investigate the time required for transmission of Anaplasma phagocytophilum by adult Ixodes ricinus ticks in vivo on dogs, and to confirm the time required for transmission observed in vivo, in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilum; Dogs; In vitro; In vivo; Ixodes ricinus; Transmission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30909972 PMCID: PMC6434881 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3396-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the feeding chambers used (as per Kröber & Guerin [23])
Fig. 2Example of feeding units in 6-well plates containing bovine blood in an incubator. Note the net covered stopper to preclude tick escape
Fig. 3Ticks on the artificial membrane within the feeding unit after removal from the 6-well plate containing bovine blood (visible in the background). Also note the bovine hair clippings in the feeding unit
Fig. 4A tick hypostome as viewed from beneath the artificial membrane of the feeding unit after removal from a culture plate well containing cattle blood warmed to 37 °C
Fig. 5Phylogenetic tree based on amplification of the ank gene and sequencing of the PCR product
Arithmetic mean number of female Ixodes ricinus ticks collected from the 6 study groups at the specific target times after infestation (Groups 1–5) or when fed until engorged (Group 6)
| Hours post-infestation | Group | Mean no. of ticks |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | 37.7 |
| 6 | 2 | 32.0 |
| 12 | 3 | 31.7 |
| 24 | 4 | 28.7 |
| 48 | 5 | 32.3 |
| Females allowed to feed until engorged | 6 | 47.7 |
Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA and antibodies in blood samples taken from dogs in Groups 1–6 prior to tick infestation (Day 0) and weekly thereafter up to 63 days post-tick infestation
| Group | Dog ID | Day (PCR/ SNAP® 4Dx® Plus) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 42 | 49 | 56 | 63 | ||
| 1 | 216, 83, 184 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− |
| 2 | 121, 230, 513 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− |
| 3 | 863, 222, 075 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− |
| 4 | 833, 376, 851 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− |
| 5 | 895, 206, 226 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− |
| 6 | 495 | −/− | −/− | −/− | +/− | +/− | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ |
| 835 | −/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | |
| 859 | −/− | −/− | +/− | +/− | +/− | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | +/+ | |
Key: −, no DNA or antibodies detected; +, DNA or antibodies detected
Relative copy number of the MSP2 target in blood collected from dogs in Group 6 (ticks fed on dogs until engorged)
| Group 6 Dog ID | Relative copy number of the MSP2 target on: | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 | |
| 495 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 304 | 719 | 274 | 130 |
| 835 | 0 | 15 | 5588 | 5135 | 1263 | 431 | 2108 |
| 859 | 0 | 0 | 804 | 3222 | 234 | 74 | 115 |
Fig. 6Percentage of blood samples in which Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA was detected (out of total number tested) at each of the respective time points during the in vitro experiment