| Literature DB >> 30909890 |
Yajun Wang1, Xiaohu Li1, Cun Zhang1, Haibao Wang1, Zipeng Li1, Jiajia Zhu2, Yongqiang Yu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have provided evidence that alcohol-dependent patients have abnormality in corpus callosum (CC); however, it is unclear whether micro-structural integrity of the CC subregions is differentially affected in this disorder.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol dependence; Corpus callosum; Diffusion tensor imaging; Subregion; Tractography
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30909890 PMCID: PMC6434796 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2079-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 3.630
Demographic and clinical characteristics
| Characteristics | Alcohol-dependent patients | Healthy controls | Statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 19 | 20 | ||
| Age (years) | 38.7 ± 7.8 (range: 21–51) | 42.9 ± 11.5 (range: 24–55) | 0.20b | |
| Daily alcohol intake (ml)a | 497.1 ± 132.8 | – | ||
| Dependence duration (years)a | 14.6 ± 7.2 | – | ||
| Abstinence time of hospitalization (days)a | 34.6 ± 23.6 | – |
The data are shown as the mean ± SD
aThe data are available for 17 from 19 patients
bThe P value was obtained by two-sample t-test
Fig. 1Subregions of the corpus callosum. Segmentation scheme of the corpus callosum (a and b). A and P are the anteriormost and posteriormost points, respectively. G, the anteriormost point on the inner convexity of the anterior callosum. A-P was used as the primary axis, lines perpendicular to which subdivide the corpus callosum into seven subregions. Fibers crossing through each subregion on axial and sagittal anatomical images (c and d)
The diffusion metrics of corpus callosum subregions
| Region | FA | AD | RD | MD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT | HC | PT | HC | PT | HC | PT | HC | |
| Subregion 1 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 1.41 ± 0.09 | 1.36 ± 0.09 | 0.64 ± 0.10 | 0.60 ± 0.06 |
|
|
| Subregion 2 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 0.55 ± 0.02 |
|
| 0.55 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.04 |
|
|
| Subregion 3 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.05 |
| Subregion 4 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.04 |
| Subregion 5 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Subregion 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Subregion 7 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 1.57 ± 0.04 | 1.55 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 0.90 ± 0.04 |
| Whole CC | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
** P < 0.01, * 0.01 < P < 0.05
For illustration, all values of AD, RD and MD were multiplied by 1000
Abbreviations: CC corpus callosum, FA Fractional Anisotropy, AD axial diffusivity; RD radial diffusivity, MD Mean diffusivity, HC healthy controls, PT alcohol-dependent patients
Entries in boldface are diffusion metrics with significant inter-group differences (P < 0.05)
Mean inter-group differences and 95% confidence intervals in diffusion metrics of corpus callosum subregions
| Region | FA | AD | RD | MD | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Difference | Low 95% CI | High 95% CI | Difference | Low 95% CI | High 95% CI | Difference | Low 95% CI | High 95% CI | Difference | Low 95% CI | High 95% CI | |
| Subregion 1 | 0.011 | −0.019 | 0.041 | −0.052 | − 0.110 | 0.006 | − 0.044 | − 0.102 | 0.014 | − 0.062 | − 0.118 | −0.005 |
| Subregion 2 | 0.013 | −0.010 | 0.036 | −0.032 | −0.058 | − 0.006 | −0.030 | − 0.063 | 0.003 | − 0.031 | −0.058 | − 0.003 |
| Subregion 3 | 0.011 | −0.013 | 0.034 | −0.031 | −0.060 | − 0.003 | −0.030 | − 0.066 | 0.007 | − 0.030 | −0.062 | 0.002 |
| Subregion 4 | 0.009 | −0.014 | 0.031 | −0.031 | −0.058 | − 0.005 | −0.026 | − 0.063 | 0.011 | − 0.028 | −0.059 | 0.003 |
| Subregion 5 | 0.016 | −0.004 | 0.037 | −0.041 | −0.071 | − 0.012 | −0.041 | − 0.078 | −0.004 | − 0.041 | −0.074 | − 0.009 |
| Subregion 6 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.043 | −0.063 | −0.110 | − 0.017 | −0.062 | − 0.108 | −0.016 | − 0.062 | −0.105 | − 0.019 |
| Subregion 7 | 0.009 | −0.003 | 0.021 | −0.021 | −0.051 | 0.010 | −0,021 | − 0.045 | 0.003 | − 0.021 | −0.045 | 0.003 |
| Whole CC | 0.010 | −0.004 | 0.023 | −0.028 | −0,053 | − 0.004 | −0.026 | − 0.050 | −0.002 | − 0.027 | −0.049 | − 0.004 |
For illustration, all values of AD, RD and MD were multiplied by 1000
Abbreviations: CC corpus callosum, FA Fractional Anisotropy, AD axial diffusivity, RD radial diffusivity, MD Mean diffusivity, CI confidence interval
Fig. 2Alterations in diffusion metrics of corpus callosum subregions. The horizontal line in the middle of each box indicates the median, while the top and bottom borders mark the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers above and below the box mark the maximum and minimum values. Abbreviations: CC, corpus callosum; FA, Fractional Anisotropy; AD, axial diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; MD, Mean diffusivity; HC, healthy controls; PT, alcohol-dependent patients
Fig. 3Correlations between diffusion metrics and clinical variables in the patients. Abbreviations: CC, corpus callosum; FA, Fractional Anisotropy; AD, axial diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; MD, Mean diffusivity; HC, healthy controls; PT, alcohol-dependent patients