Literature DB >> 30909209

Comparison between a Paper-Pencil Version and Computerized Version for the Realization of a Neuropsychological Test: The Example of the Trail Making Test.

Guillaume Sacco1,2, Grégory Ben-Sadoun1, Jérémy Bourgeois1, Roxane Fabre1, Valeria Manera1, Philippe Robert1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychological tests are particularly important for the clinical evaluation and Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. However, the tests currently employed for neuropsychological assessment have been developed several decades ago, and thus they do not fully exploit the potential provided by modern digital tools. One of the tests most commonly employed to assess attention and executive functions is the Trail Making Test (TMT).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the TMT developed and used for the serious exergame X-Torp (TMTX-Torp) can be used to evaluate cognitive functions such as mental flexibility.
METHODS: Adjusted multivariate mixed model was used to compare performances in the TMTX-Torp to performances in the standard variant (TMTs) in three populations. 21 participants with AD (78.6y±8.5 y), 27 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (76.8y±8.5 y), and 27 healthy (HEC) (71.8y±7.4 y) were included.
RESULTS: A difference was observed for the TMT A between AD and HEC and for the TMT B between AD and MCI and between AD and HEC. Whatever the variant of the TMT, we found a positive linear correlation between the time to complete the TMTX-Torp and the TMTs for HEC (TMT A: r = 0.75, p < 0.001; TMT B: r = 0.52, p = 0.008) and MCI participants (TMT A: r = 0.53, p = 0.005; TMT B: r = 0.48, p = 0.025) but not for AD participants.
CONCLUSION: Although these versions of the TMT were not identical, the results showed that both versions were able to discriminate between HEC, MCI, and AD populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; executive function; neurocognitive disorders; serious zzm321990games

Year:  2019        PMID: 30909209     DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


  3 in total

1.  Validation of At-Home Application of a Digital Cognitive Screener for Older Adults.

Authors:  Melissa Arioli; James Rini; Roger Anguera-Singla; Adam Gazzaley; Peter E Wais
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.702

2.  Innovative motor and cognitive dual-task approaches combining upper and lower limbs may improve dementia early detection.

Authors:  Gianmaria Mancioppi; Laura Fiorini; Erika Rovini; Radia Zeghari; Auriane Gros; Valeria Manera; Philippe Robert; Filippo Cavallo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A Validation Study of the Inbrain CST: a Tablet Computer-based Cognitive Screening Test for Elderly People with Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Juhee Chin; Da Eun Kim; Hyejoo Lee; Juoh Yun; Byung Hwa Lee; Jongha Park; Jiho Yeom; Dae Seock Shin; Duk L Na
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.