Literature DB >> 3090916

Bronchoconstriction induced by distilled water. Sensitivity in asthmatics and relationship to exercise-induced bronchospasm.

R Bascom, E R Bleecker.   

Abstract

We studied the ability of bronchial challenge with an ultrasonically produced, distilled water aerosol to detect airways hyperreactivity in asthmatics and also evaluated its relationship to exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Fifteen asthmatics and 10 normal subjects inhaled, at room temperature, distilled water aerosol in increasing concentrations. On a separate day, each subject performed a standard methacholine challenge. On the third day, all asthmatics exercised on a treadmill for 6 min at 90% maximal heart rate while breathing room-temperature, dry air. Pulmonary mechanics (FEV1 and SGaw) were measured before and after each challenge. Seven of the asthmatics and all of the normal subjects did not react to challenge with distilled water. Distilled-water challenge caused a 20% decrease in FEV1 in only 53% (8 of the 15) asthmatics, whereas all of the asthmatics reacted to methacholine challenge with a 20% fall in FEV1. Thus, distilled water was not a sensitive challenge procedure for the detection of airways hyperreactivity in asthma and it cannot be used as a routine screening test. However, in the asthmatics, the response to distilled water challenge correlated significantly with the response to exercise (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001). Seven asthmatics were reactive to both exercise and water, 7 were reactive to neither exercise nor water, and 1 reacted to water but not to exercise. Cromolyn completely or partially blocked both distilled-water- and exercise-induced bronchospasm in the reactive asthmatics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3090916     DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1986.134.2.248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of refractoriness after exercise- and hyperventilation-induced asthma.

Authors:  D Nowak; G Kuziek; R Jörres; H Magnussen
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Comparative bronchial responses to hyperosmolar saline and methacholine in asthma.

Authors:  L P Boulet; C Legris; L Thibault; H Turcotte
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Effect of hypertonic saline on mucociliary clearance and clinical outcomes in chronic bronchitis.

Authors:  William D Bennett; Ashley G Henderson; Agathe Ceppe; Kirby L Zeman; Jihong Wu; Christine Gladman; Fred Fuller; Stephen Gazda; Brian Button; Richard C Boucher; Scott H Donaldson
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-08-11

4.  Comparison of sulphur dioxide and metabisulphite airway reactivity in subjects with asthma.

Authors:  P I Field; M McClean; R Simmul; N Berend
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Effect of loratadine, an H1 antihistamine, on induced cough in non-asthmatic patients with chronic cough.

Authors:  S Tanaka; K Hirata; N Kurihara; J Yoshikawa; T Takeda
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Airway hyperresponsiveness to hypertonic saline as a predictive index of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Authors:  Inseon S Choi; Se-Woong Chung; Youngil I Koh; Myoung-Ki Sim; Seo-Na Hong; Jang-Sik Moon
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.884

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.