Spyridon Fortis1,2, Alejandro Comellas1, Barry J Make3, Craig P Hersh4,5, Sandeep Bodduluri6, Dimitris Georgopoulos2,7,8, Victor Kim9, Gerard J Criner9, Mark T Dransfield6,10, Surya P Bhatt6. 1. 1 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa. 2. 2 Medical School. 3. 3 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado. 4. 4 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and. 5. 5 Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. 6 UAB Lung Imaging Core, Lung Health Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 7. 7 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, and. 8. 8 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece. 9. 9 Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and. 10. 10 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
Rationale: The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society defines a positive bronchodilator response (BDR) by a composite of BDR in either forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and/or forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than or equal to 12% and 200 ml (ATS-BDR). We hypothesized that ATS-BDR components would be differentially associated with important chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outcomes. Objectives: To examine whether ATS-BDR components are differentially associated with clinical, functional, and radiographic features in COPD. Methods: We included subjects with COPD enrolled in the COPDGene study. In the main analysis, we excluded subjects with self-reported asthma. We categorized BDR into the following: 1) No-BDR, no BDR in either FEV1 or FVC; 2) FEV1-BDR, BDR in FEV1 but no BDR in FVC; 3) FVC-BDR, BDR in FVC but no BDR in FEV1; and 4) Combined-BDR, BDR in both FEV1 and FVC. We constructed multivariable logistic, linear, zero-inflated negative binomial, and Cox hazards models to examine the association of BDR categories with symptoms, computed tomography findings, change in FEV1 over time, respiratory exacerbations, and mortality. We also created models using the ATS BDR definition (ATS-BDR) as the main independent variable. Results: Of 3,340 COPD subjects included in the analysis, 1,083 (32.43%) had ATS-BDR, 182 (5.45%) had FEV1-BDR, 522 (15.63%) had FVC-BDR, and 379 (11.34%) had Combined-BDR. All BDR categories were associated with FEV1 decline compared with No-BDR. Compared with No-BDR, both ATS-BDR and Combined-BDR were associated with higher functional residual capacity %predicted, greater internal perimeter of 10 mm, and greater 6-minute-walk distance. In contrast to ATS-BDR, Combined-BDR was independently associated with less emphysema (adjusted beta regression coefficient, -1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.68 to -0.65; P = 0.001), more frequent respiratory exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50; P = 0.02) and severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.71; P = 0.02), and lower mortality (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99; P = 0.046). Sensitivity analysis that included subjects with self-reported history of asthma showed similar findings. Conclusions: BDR in both FEV1 and FVC indicates a COPD phenotype with asthma-like characteristics, and provides clinically more meaningful information than current definitions of BDR.
Rationale: The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society defines a positive bronchodilator response (BDR) by a composite of BDR in either forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and/or forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than or equal to 12% and 200 ml (ATS-BDR). We hypothesized that ATS-BDR components would be differentially associated with important chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outcomes. Objectives: To examine whether ATS-BDR components are differentially associated with clinical, functional, and radiographic features in COPD. Methods: We included subjects with COPD enrolled in the COPDGene study. In the main analysis, we excluded subjects with self-reported asthma. We categorized BDR into the following: 1) No-BDR, no BDR in either FEV1 or FVC; 2) FEV1-BDR, BDR in FEV1 but no BDR in FVC; 3) FVC-BDR, BDR in FVC but no BDR in FEV1; and 4) Combined-BDR, BDR in both FEV1 and FVC. We constructed multivariable logistic, linear, zero-inflated negative binomial, and Cox hazards models to examine the association of BDR categories with symptoms, computed tomography findings, change in FEV1 over time, respiratory exacerbations, and mortality. We also created models using the ATS BDR definition (ATS-BDR) as the main independent variable. Results: Of 3,340 COPD subjects included in the analysis, 1,083 (32.43%) had ATS-BDR, 182 (5.45%) had FEV1-BDR, 522 (15.63%) had FVC-BDR, and 379 (11.34%) had Combined-BDR. All BDR categories were associated with FEV1 decline compared with No-BDR. Compared with No-BDR, both ATS-BDR and Combined-BDR were associated with higher functional residual capacity %predicted, greater internal perimeter of 10 mm, and greater 6-minute-walk distance. In contrast to ATS-BDR, Combined-BDR was independently associated with less emphysema (adjusted beta regression coefficient, -1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.68 to -0.65; P = 0.001), more frequent respiratory exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50; P = 0.02) and severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.71; P = 0.02), and lower mortality (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99; P = 0.046). Sensitivity analysis that included subjects with self-reported history of asthma showed similar findings. Conclusions: BDR in both FEV1 and FVC indicates a COPD phenotype with asthma-like characteristics, and provides clinically more meaningful information than current definitions of BDR.
Authors: Emily S Wan; John E Hokanson; James R Murphy; Elizabeth A Regan; Barry J Make; David A Lynch; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Paul Albert; Alvar Agusti; Lisa Edwards; Ruth Tal-Singer; Julie Yates; Per Bakke; Bartolome R Celli; Harvey O Coxson; Courtney Crim; David A Lomas; William Macnee; Bruce Miller; Stephen Rennard; Edwin K Silverman; Jørgen Vestbo; Emiel Wouters; Peter Calverley Journal: Thorax Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Jørgen Vestbo; Lisa D Edwards; Paul D Scanlon; Julie C Yates; Alvar Agusti; Per Bakke; Peter M A Calverley; Bartolome Celli; Harvey O Coxson; Courtney Crim; David A Lomas; William MacNee; Bruce E Miller; Edwin K Silverman; Ruth Tal-Singer; Emiel Wouters; Stephen I Rennard Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrei Schwartz; Nicholas Arnold; Becky Skinner; Jacob Simmering; Michael Eberlein; Alejandro P Comellas; Spyridon Fortis Journal: Respir Care Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Yu-Hang Zhang; Michael R Hoopmann; Peter J Castaldi; Kirsten A Simonsen; Mukul K Midha; Michael H Cho; Gerard J Criner; Raphael Bueno; Jiangyuan Liu; Robert L Moritz; Edwin K Silverman Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Emily S Wan; John E Hokanson; Elizabeth A Regan; Kendra A Young; Barry J Make; Dawn L DeMeo; Stefanie E Mason; Raul San Jose Estepar; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman Journal: Chest Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Trisha M Parekh; Erika S Helgeson; John Connett; Helen Voelker; Sharon X Ling; Stephen C Lazarus; Surya P Bhatt; David M MacDonald; Takudzwa Mkorombindo; Ken M Kunisaki; Spyridon Fortis; David Kaminsky; Mark T Dransfield Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2022-10
Authors: James E Hansen; Asli G Dilektasli; Janos Porszasz; William W Stringer; Youngju Pak; Harry B Rossiter; Richard Casaburi Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2019-12
Authors: Spyridon Fortis; Alejandro P Comellas; Surya P Bhatt; Eric A Hoffman; MeiLan K Han; Nirav R Bhakta; Robert Paine; Bonnie Ronish; Richard E Kanner; Mark Dransfield; Daniel Hoesterey; Russell G Buhr; R Graham Barr; Brett Dolezal; Victor E Ortega; M Bradley Drummond; Mehrdad Arjomandi; Robert J Kaner; Victor Kim; Jeffrey L Curtis; Russell P Bowler; Fernando Martinez; Wassim W Labaki; Christopher B Cooper; Wanda K O'Neal; Gerald Criner; Nadia N Hansel; Jerry A Krishnan; Prescott Woodruff; David Couper; Donald Tashkin; Igor Barjaktarevic Journal: Chest Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 10.262
Authors: Spyridon Fortis; Alejandro Comellas; Victor Kim; Richard Casaburi; John E Hokanson; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Emily S Wan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 4.379