Literature DB >> 30908677

Chemical receptors of the arytenoid: A comparison of human and mouse.

Marie E Jetté1,2, Matthew S Clary1, Jeremy D Prager1,3, Thomas E Finger4,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The larynx is a highly responsive organ exposed to mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli. Chemicals elicit responses both in intraepithelial nerve fibers and in specialized chemosensory cells, including scattered solitary cells as well as taste cells organized into taste buds. Activation of both chemosensory cells and taste buds in the larynx elicit cough, swallow, or apnea with exposure to sour or bitter substances, and even by water or sweet-tasting chemicals. In an effort to begin understanding their function, we sought to compare the distribution, density, and types of chemosensory cells and chemoresponsive nerve fibers in laryngeal epithelium of humans and mice. STUDY
DESIGN: Animal and human laboratory analysis.
METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, we identified taste cells and polymodal nociceptive nerve fibers in the arytenoid area of the laryngeal epithelium of the following: 1) infants undergoing supraglottoplasty for laryngomalacia, and 2) a cadaveric specimen procured from a 34-year-old donor. We then compared these findings to both preweanling and mature mouse tissue.
RESULTS: Arytenoid tissue from both human and mouse contained many taste buds containing type II taste cells-bitter, sweet, or umami sensing-which were innervated by nerve fibers expressing P2X3 type adenosine triphosphate receptors. Type III cells (acid responsive) were also present, but they were fewer in human tissue than in equivalent tissue from mice. In both species, the epithelium was densely innervated by free nerve endings.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that from a standpoint of chemosensation, human and mouse larynges are biologically similar. This suggests that a murine model can be used effectively in laryngeal chemosensory research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:423-430, 2020.
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngomalacia; arytenoid; chemoreceptors; epithelium; irritation; taste buds

Year:  2019        PMID: 30908677      PMCID: PMC6761039          DOI: 10.1002/lary.27931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  28 in total

1.  Laryngeal water receptors initiating apnea in the lamb.

Authors:  A T Storey; P Johnson
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Number and distribution of taste buds on the epiglottis, pharynx, larynx, soft palate and uvula in a human newborn.

Authors:  E R LALONDE; J A EGLITIS
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1961-06

Review 3.  Otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  E B Gaynor
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  ATP signaling is crucial for communication from taste buds to gustatory nerves.

Authors:  Thomas E Finger; Vicktoria Danilova; Jennell Barrows; Dianna L Bartel; Alison J Vigers; Leslie Stone; Goran Hellekant; Sue C Kinnamon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Effects of upper respiratory tract stimuli on neonatal respiration: reflex and single neuron analyses in the kitten.

Authors:  G E Lucier; A T Storey; B J Sessle
Journal:  Biol Neonate       Date:  1979

6.  Quantitative analysis of developing epiglottal taste buds in sheep.

Authors:  R M Bradley; M L Cheal; Y H Kim
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Response properties of fibers in the hamster superior laryngeal nerve.

Authors:  J D Dickman; D V Smith
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-05-31       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Postsynaptic P2X3-containing receptors in gustatory nerve fibres mediate responses to all taste qualities in mice.

Authors:  Aurelie Vandenbeuch; Eric D Larson; Catherine B Anderson; Steven A Smith; Anthony P Ford; Thomas E Finger; Sue C Kinnamon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Evidence of solitary chemosensory cells in a large mammal: the diffuse chemosensory system in Bos taurus airways.

Authors:  Marco Tizzano; Flavia Merigo; Andrea Sbarbati
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Evidence for a laryngeal chemoreflex in some human preterm infants.

Authors:  E A Perkett; R L Vaughan
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1982-11
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Laryngeal Chemoreflex in Health and Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Shivani Pathak; Laurie Slovarp; Matthew S Clary; Marie E Jetté
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  An Airway Protection Program Revealed by Sweeping Genetic Control of Vagal Afferents.

Authors:  Sara L Prescott; Benjamin D Umans; Erika K Williams; Rachael D Brust; Stephen D Liberles
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Cellular Diversity and Regeneration in Taste Buds.

Authors:  Thomas E Finger; Linda A Barlow
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2021-01-12

4.  Sensory Innervation of the Larynx and the Search for Mucosal Mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  Alexander G Foote; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Examining the Influence of Chemosensation on Laryngeal Health and Disorders.

Authors:  Carolyn K Novaleski; Richard L Doty; Alissa A Nolden; Paul M Wise; Joel D Mainland; Pamela H Dalton
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Are Multiple Chemosensory Systems Accountable for COVID-19 Outcome?

Authors:  Antonio Caretta; Carla Mucignat-Caretta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.