Ofir Artzi1,2,3, Sarit Cohen4, Ines Verner5, Joseph N Mehrabi2, Hadas Prag Naveh6, Hadas Shoshani1,5, Tal Nachlieli5. 1. Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Dr. Artzi and Associates, Laser & Cosmetic Dermatology Clinical Research Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. 4. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zeriffin, Israel. 5. Exellence Clinic, Kiriat Bialik, Israel. 6. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Rome "G. Marconi," Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microneedling fractional radiofrequency (FRF) and chemical peels are widely used for skin rejuvenation. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of FRF and trichloroacetic acid 20% (TCA20%) peel in different combinations for determining the optimal treatment protocol. METHODS: In this prospective clinical comparison of 4 protocols (FRF alone, TCA20% alone, TCA20% before FRF [TCA→FRF], and TCA20% following FRF [FRF→TCA]), the patients underwent 3.8 ± 1.2 successive treatments of one protocol at 4- to 6-week intervals. The patients and 2 dermatologists evaluated improvement of pigmentation and dyschromia, erythema and blood vessels, laxity and wrinkling, and skin imperfections using a global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) and a 1 to 5 scoring system. The patients rated their satisfaction and reported adverse effects and reduced activity. Skin impedance and histological changes following the different protocols were also evaluated on 3 additional volunteers. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (age range 22-80 years) were studied. TCA→FRF caused skin impedance to decrease, yielding a more superficial and less-efficient penetration of FRF energy. FRF→TCA produced more significant improvement in overall facial skin appearance (GAIS) and most evaluated skin parameters. Adverse effects and satisfaction rates were similar for all approaches. CONCLUSION: FRF→TCA had the best synergistic effect on skin rejuvenation compared with FRF or TCA20% alone and TCA→FRF.
BACKGROUND: Microneedling fractional radiofrequency (FRF) and chemical peels are widely used for skin rejuvenation. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of FRF and trichloroacetic acid 20% (TCA20%) peel in different combinations for determining the optimal treatment protocol. METHODS: In this prospective clinical comparison of 4 protocols (FRF alone, TCA20% alone, TCA20% before FRF [TCA→FRF], and TCA20% following FRF [FRF→TCA]), the patients underwent 3.8 ± 1.2 successive treatments of one protocol at 4- to 6-week intervals. The patients and 2 dermatologists evaluated improvement of pigmentation and dyschromia, erythema and blood vessels, laxity and wrinkling, and skin imperfections using a global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) and a 1 to 5 scoring system. The patients rated their satisfaction and reported adverse effects and reduced activity. Skin impedance and histological changes following the different protocols were also evaluated on 3 additional volunteers. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (age range 22-80 years) were studied. TCA→FRF caused skin impedance to decrease, yielding a more superficial and less-efficient penetration of FRF energy. FRF→TCA produced more significant improvement in overall facial skin appearance (GAIS) and most evaluated skin parameters. Adverse effects and satisfaction rates were similar for all approaches. CONCLUSION: FRF→TCA had the best synergistic effect on skin rejuvenation compared with FRF or TCA20% alone and TCA→FRF.