Gavin Tansley1, Nadine Schuurman1, Matthew Bowes1, Mete Erdogan1, Robert Green1, Mark Asbridge1, Natalie Yanchar1. 1. From the Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Tansley); the Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC (Schuurman); the Nova Scotia Medical Examiner Service, Dartmouth, NS (Bowes); Trauma Nova Scotia, Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness, Halifax, NS (Erdogan, Green); the Department of Critical Care, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Green); the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Asbridge); and the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Yanchar).
Abstract
Background: Trauma is a leading contributor to the burden of disease in Canada, accounting for more than 15 000 deaths annually. Although caring for injured patients at designated trauma centres (TCs) is consistently associated with survival benefits, it is unclear how travel time to definitive care influences outcomes. Using a population-based sample of trauma patients, we studied the association between predicted travel time (PTT) to TCs and mortality for patients assigned to ground transport. Methods: Victims of penetrating trauma or motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) in Nova Scotia between 2005 and 2014 were identified from a provincial trauma registry. We conducted cost distance analyses to quantify PTT for each injury location to the nearest TC. Adjusted associations between TC access and injury-related mortality were then estimated using logistic regression. Results: Greater than 30 minutes of PTT to a TC was associated with a 66% increased risk of death for MVC victims (p = 0.045). This association was lost when scene deaths were excluded from the analysis. Sustaining a penetrating trauma greater than 30 minutes from a TC was associated with a 3.4-fold increase in risk of death. Following the exclusion of scene deaths, this association remained and approached significance (odds ratio 3.48, 95% confidence interval 0.98–14.5, p = 0.053). Conclusion: Predicted travel times greater than 30 minutes were associated with worse outcomes for victims of MVCs and penetrating injuries. Improving communication across the trauma system and reducing prehospital times may help optimize outcomes for rural trauma patients.
Background: Trauma is a leading contributor to the burden of disease in Canada, accounting for more than 15 000 deaths annually. Although caring for injured patients at designated trauma centres (TCs) is consistently associated with survival benefits, it is unclear how travel time to definitive care influences outcomes. Using a population-based sample of traumapatients, we studied the association between predicted travel time (PTT) to TCs and mortality for patients assigned to ground transport. Methods: Victims of penetrating trauma or motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) in Nova Scotia between 2005 and 2014 were identified from a provincial trauma registry. We conducted cost distance analyses to quantify PTT for each injury location to the nearest TC. Adjusted associations between TC access and injury-related mortality were then estimated using logistic regression. Results: Greater than 30 minutes of PTT to a TC was associated with a 66% increased risk of death for MVC victims (p = 0.045). This association was lost when scene deaths were excluded from the analysis. Sustaining a penetrating trauma greater than 30 minutes from a TC was associated with a 3.4-fold increase in risk of death. Following the exclusion of scene deaths, this association remained and approached significance (odds ratio 3.48, 95% confidence interval 0.98–14.5, p = 0.053). Conclusion: Predicted travel times greater than 30 minutes were associated with worse outcomes for victims of MVCs and penetrating injuries. Improving communication across the trauma system and reducing prehospital times may help optimize outcomes for rural traumapatients.
Authors: Ellen J MacKenzie; Frederick P Rivara; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens; Katherine P Frey; Brian L Egleston; David S Salkever; Daniel O Scharfstein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ginette Thibault-Halman; John M Tallon; Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz; Lynne Fenerty; Saleema A Karim; Beth Sealy; David B Clarke Journal: J Trauma Date: 2011-05
Authors: Brian Celso; Joseph Tepas; Barbara Langland-Orban; Etienne Pracht; Linda Papa; Lawrence Lottenberg; Lewis Flint Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-02
Authors: Richard P Gonzalez; Glenn R Cummings; Herbert A Phelan; Madhuri S Mulekar; Charles B Rodning Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Scott M Sasser; Richard C Hunt; Ernest E Sullivent; Marlena M Wald; Jane Mitchko; Gregory J Jurkovich; Mark C Henry; Jeffrey P Salomone; Stewart C Wang; Robert L Galli; Arthur Cooper; Lawrence H Brown; Richard W Sattin Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2009-01-23
Authors: Alexander F Bedard; Lina V Mata; Chelsea Dymond; Fabio Moreira; Julia Dixon; Steven G Schauer; Adit A Ginde; Vikhyat Bebarta; Ernest E Moore; Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2020-12-09
Authors: Michael M Neeki; Christina Cheung; Fanglong Dong; Nam Pham; Dylan Shafer; Arianna Neeki; Keeyon Hajjafar; Rodney Borger; Brandon Woodward; Louis Tran Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-08-27
Authors: Hendry R Sawe; Sveta Milusheva; Kevin Croke; Saahil Karpe; Meyhar Mohammed; Juma A Mfinanga Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 1.112
Authors: Jonathan H Pelletier; Jaskaran Rakkar; Dennis Simon; Alicia K Au; Dana Y Fuhrman; Robert S B Clark; Patrick M Kochanek; Christopher M Horvat Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2022-01-05
Authors: Uchechukwu L Osuagwu; Matthew Xu; Milan K Piya; Kingsley E Agho; David Simmons Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 2.763