Literature DB >> 30907803

Prospective Longitudinal Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Relationship with Body Mass Index.

Oscar Ochoa1, Ramon Garza1, Steven Pisano1, Minas Chrysopoulo1, Peter Ledoux1, Gary Arishita1, Norma Ketchum1, Joel E Michalek1, Chet Nastala1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction plays a significant role in breast cancer treatment recovery. Introduction of the BREAST-Q questionnaire has facilitated quantifying patient-reported quality-of-life measures, promoting improved evidence-based clinical practice. Information regarding the effects of body mass index on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life is significantly lacking.
METHODS: Consecutive deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction patients prospectively completed BREAST-Q questionnaires preoperatively and at two points postoperatively. The first (postoperative time point A) and second (postoperative time point B) postoperative questionnaires were completed 1 month postoperatively and following breast revision, respectively. Postoperative flap and donor-site complications were recorded prospectively. BREAST-Q scores were compared at all time points and stratified by body mass index group (≤25, >25 to 29.9, 30 to 34.9, and ≥35 kg/m).
RESULTS: Between July of 2012 and August of 2016, 73 patients underwent 130 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Breast satisfaction and psychosocial and sexual well-being scores increased significantly postoperatively. Chest and abdominal physical well-being scores returned to baseline levels by postoperative point B. Preoperatively, stratified by body mass index, breast satisfaction and psychosocial well-being scores were significantly lower among patients with body mass index of 35 or higher and of more than 30, respectively. After reconstruction, not only were breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and sexual well-being scores significantly improved in all body mass index groups versus baseline, but also between-body mass index group differences were no longer present. Outcome satisfaction, flap, and donor-site morbidity were similar irrespective of body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate significant improvements in breast satisfaction and psychosocial and sexual well-being among patients following DIEP flap reconstruction. Preoperative differences in quality-of-life scores were improved in patients with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m). CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30907803     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes After DIEP Breast Reconstruction at a Low-Volume Community Hospital Without Microvascular Fellowship Training.

Authors:  Kenneth K Kao; Scott M Nishikawa; Paul D Faringer
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2021-09-29

2.  Comparing Plastic Surgeon Operative Time for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: 2-stage More Efficient than 1-stage?

Authors:  Christopher J Issa; Stephen M Lu; Elizabeth M Boudiab; Jeffrey DeSano; Neil S Sachanandani; Jeremy M Powers; Kongkrit Chaiyasate
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Breast-Q: A Tool to Evaluate Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ishith Seth; Nimish Seth; Gabriella Bulloch; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  Conversion of Breast Implants into Natural Breast Reconstruction: Evaluating Lipofilled Mini Dorsi Flap.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Piat; Vincenzo Giovinazzo; Aurore Talha; Gabriela Dinnebier Tomazzoni; Anna Paula Maiato; Lucas Roskamp Budel; Christophe Ho Quoc
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Immediate versus secondary DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a multicenter outcome study.

Authors:  L Prantl; N Moellhoff; U von Fritschen; R E Giunta; G Germann; A Kehrer; D Lonic; F Zeman; P N Broer; P I Heidekrueger
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Validating machine learning approaches for prediction of donor related complication in microsurgical breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yujin Myung; Sungmi Jeon; Chanyeong Heo; Eun-Kyu Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Hee-Chul Shin; Eun-Joo Yang; Jae Hoon Jeong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.