Erin Koffel1,2, Erin Amundson1,3, Grace Polusny1, Jennifer P Wisdom4. 1. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 4. Jennifer Wisdom Consulting, New York, New York.
Abstract
Objective/Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the most effective treatment for insomnia but is severely underutilized. One of the key reasons for underuse is lack of knowledge among patients and primary care providers, but effective methods and materials for increasing knowledge are unknown. This study conducted in-depth interviews with CBT-I patients and their CBT-I providers to explore their perceptions on increasing utilization of CBT-I. Participants: Participants included patients who had engaged in CBT-I (N = 17) and CBT-I providers (N = 7). Methods: Semistructured interviews were used to explore the CBT-I referral process, recommendations for increasing uptake of CBT-I, and opinions on CBT-I self-management, with thematic analysis used to identify conceptual themes. Findings were compared and contrasted across patients who completed versus prematurely discontinued therapy and patients versus CBT-I providers. Results: Three main themes of referral, selling, and delivery were identified. Regarding referral, patients had not heard of nor requested CBT-I. Proactive outreach is crucial in populations in which insomnia is so common that it becomes normalized. For selling, patients and CBT-I providers had powerful testimonials that could be used to "sell" treatment using a peer-to-peer approach. Finally, for delivery, patients and CBT-I providers were ambivalent about alternative delivery formats and emphasized the need for personal contact. Although technology may be useful in advertising and delivering CBT-I, it will be important to ensure that these approaches promote rather than discourage engagement in CBT-I. Conclusions: These findings suggest promising opportunities to increase the use of CBT-I, including direct-to-consumer marketing.
Objective/Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the most effective treatment for insomnia but is severely underutilized. One of the key reasons for underuse is lack of knowledge among patients and primary care providers, but effective methods and materials for increasing knowledge are unknown. This study conducted in-depth interviews with CBT-Ipatients and their CBT-I providers to explore their perceptions on increasing utilization of CBT-I. Participants: Participants included patients who had engaged in CBT-I (N = 17) and CBT-I providers (N = 7). Methods: Semistructured interviews were used to explore the CBT-I referral process, recommendations for increasing uptake of CBT-I, and opinions on CBT-I self-management, with thematic analysis used to identify conceptual themes. Findings were compared and contrasted across patients who completed versus prematurely discontinued therapy and patients versus CBT-I providers. Results: Three main themes of referral, selling, and delivery were identified. Regarding referral, patients had not heard of nor requested CBT-I. Proactive outreach is crucial in populations in which insomnia is so common that it becomes normalized. For selling, patients and CBT-I providers had powerful testimonials that could be used to "sell" treatment using a peer-to-peer approach. Finally, for delivery, patients and CBT-I providers were ambivalent about alternative delivery formats and emphasized the need for personal contact. Although technology may be useful in advertising and delivering CBT-I, it will be important to ensure that these approaches promote rather than discourage engagement in CBT-I. Conclusions: These findings suggest promising opportunities to increase the use of CBT-I, including direct-to-consumer marketing.
Authors: Erin Koffel; Eric Kuhn; Napoleon Petsoulis; Christopher R Erbes; Samantha Anders; Julia E Hoffman; Josef I Ruzek; Melissa A Polusny Journal: Health Informatics J Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Nicole K Y Tang; S Tanya Lereya; Hayley Boulton; Michelle A Miller; Dieter Wolke; Francesco P Cappuccio Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Janet M Y Cheung; Kristina Atternäs; Madeleine Melchior; Nathaniel S Marshall; Romano A Fois; Bandana Saini Journal: Aust J Prim Health Date: 2014 Impact factor: 1.307
Authors: Elizabeth C Parsons; Elizabeth A Mattox; Lauren A Beste; David H Au; Bessie A Young; Michael F Chang; Brian N Palen Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-02
Authors: Sheila N Garland; Kelly Trevino; Kevin T Liou; Philip Gehrman; Eugenie Spiguel; Jodi MacLeod; Desirée A H Walker; Betsy Glosik; Christina Seluzicki; Frances K Barg; Jun J Mao Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Nicole E Carmona; Aleksandra Usyatynsky; Samlau Kutana; Penny Corkum; Joanna Henderson; Kelly McShane; Colin Shapiro; Souraya Sidani; Jennifer Stinson; Colleen E Carney Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2021-11-01