Literature DB >> 30907010

Hypersensitivity transfusion reactions to platelet concentrate: a retrospective analysis of the French hemovigilance network.

Paul M Mertes1, Charles Tacquard1, Georges Andreu2, Daniel Kientz3, Sylvie Gross4, Lucile Malard4, Christian Drouet5, Monique Carlier6, Christian Gachet3, Imad Sandid7, Karim Boudjedir7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among labile blood products, platelet concentrates (PCs) are the leading cause of hypersensitivity transfusion reactions (HTRs). These reactions often lead to interruption of PC transfusion and can result in a prolonged transfusion process leading to significant morbidity and use of premedication and close monitoring for patients with a history of allergic transfusion reactions. The French hemovigilance database is one of the largest standardized databases providing information on HTRs following administration of labile blood products. In this study, we analyzed this database to assess the relative risk of HTR for each type of PC. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HTRs following PC transfusion were retrospectively extracted from the e-Fit Hemovigilance database of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). Frequencies were calculated using the number of specific PCs transfused.
RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2014, the overall estimated incidence of HTRs following PC administration was calculated at 232 HTRs per 100,000 PCs transfused. The rate of HTRs was significantly higher with apheresis PC (337/100,000) than with buffy-coat PC (94/100,000). Platelets in additive solutions (PAS) were associated with a significantly lower frequency of HTRs when compared with PCs in native plasma. Amotosalen/UVA- PCs (APCs and BCPCs) which are always in PAS in France, exhibited the lowest frequency of HTRs when compared with their corresponding PCs in native plasma or in PAS (p < 10-7 in all comparisons).
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the type of PC and its processing may have an impact on the risk of HTR.
© 2019 AABB.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30907010     DOI: 10.1111/trf.15275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Comparison of Transfusion-Related Adverse Reactions Among Apheresis Platelets, Whole Blood-Derived Platelets, and Platelets Subjected to Pathogen Reduction Technology as Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module.

Authors:  Sanjida J Mowla; Ian T Kracalik; Mathew R P Sapiano; Lynne O'Hearn; Chester Andrzejewski; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2021-04-02

2.  Pathogen reduction of blood components during outbreaks of infectious diseases in the European Union: an expert opinion from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control consultation meeting.

Authors:  Dragoslav Domanović; Ines Ushiro-Lumb; Veerle Compernolle; Sergio Brusin; Markus Funk; Pierre Gallian; Jørgen Georgsen; Mart Janssen; Teresa Jimenez-Marco; Folke Knutson; Giancarlo M Liumbruno; Polonca Mali; Giuseppe Marano; Yuyun Maryuningsih; Christoph Niederhauser; Constantina Politis; Simonetta Pupella; Guy Rautmann; Karmin Saadat; Imad Sandid; Ana P Sousa; Stefania Vaglio; Claudio Velati; Nicole Verdun; Miguel Vesga; Paolo Rebulla
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Platelet concentrate and type II IL-1 receptor are risk factors for allergic transfusion reactions in children.

Authors:  Wenjing Hu; Li Feng; Meng Li; Ting Li; Yudong Dai; Xiaowei Wang
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.638

4.  Comparative risk of pulmonary adverse events with transfusion of pathogen reduced and conventional platelet components.

Authors:  Edward L Snyder; Allison P Wheeler; Majed Refaai; Claudia S Cohn; Jessica Poisson; Magali Fontaine; Mary Sehl; Ajay K Nooka; Lynne Uhl; Philip Spinella; Maly Fenelus; Darla Liles; Thomas Coyle; Joanne Becker; Michael Jeng; Eric A Gehrie; Bryan R Spencer; Pampee Young; Andrew Johnson; Jennifer J O'Brien; Gary J Schiller; John D Roback; Elizabeth Malynn; Ronald Jackups; Scott T Avecilla; Jin-Sying Lin; Kathy Liu; Stanley Bentow; Ho-Lan Peng; Jeanne Varrone; Richard J Benjamin; Laurence M Corash
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Supplemental findings of the 2019 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey.

Authors:  Sanjida J Mowla; Mathew R P Sapiano; Jefferson M Jones; James J Berger; Sridhar V Basavaraju
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.