Literature DB >> 30906712

Mapping of Paediatric Cochlear Implant Using Neural Response Threshold (NRT) and Behavioural Observation Audiometry (BOA).

Ashvanee Kumar Chaudhary1, Vishwambhar Singh1, Rajesh Kumar1, Ashutosh Alakh Avinashi1, Sunil Kumar1.   

Abstract

To measure the correlation between neural response threshold (NRT) and most comfortable level for behavioural response (MCLB) whichever is better for rehabilitation purpose and to calculate the impedance of the electrode in cochlear implant recipient. Mapping may be done by various methods here we did by NRT and behavioral observation audiometry (BOA). NRT is technique by which we measure the response from the auditory nerve using the hi-resolution bionic ear system. Neural response measurement depends on the-neural tissue, stimulus used and recording technique. BOA is used for observing motor response on presenting sound to the implanted child. Most comfortable level for behavioural response (MCLB) is calculated for behavioural response. It measures the useful information about low frequency hearing, it provides more information about the hearing of neurologically immature babies giving indication of uncomfortable loudness levels. The NRT and MCLB is calculated for 2nd, 6th, and 11th electrode for all patients in our study. Auditory response threshold is better for rehabilitations then behavioural observation audiometry for Cochlear implant patients. Mean value and standard deviation of neural response threshold (NRT) (qu) are 10.23, 3.67; 11.27, 4.39; 10.71, 3.88 at 2nd, 6th, and 11th electrode respectively. Mean value and standard deviation of Most comfortable level for behavioral response (qu) are 20.49, 7.08; 21.26, 7.31; 21.01, 6.03 at 2nd, 6th and 11th electrode respectively. NRT is better for post-operative rehabilitations and MCL and threshold vary with different electrode and in different patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioural observation audiometry; Cochlear Implant; Impedance; Most comfortable level for behavioural response; Neural response threshold

Year:  2018        PMID: 30906712      PMCID: PMC6401049          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1524-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  5 in total

Review 1.  Paediatric cochlear implantation factors that affect outcomes.

Authors:  Sandra Driver; Dan Jiang
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.140

2.  Long-term reliability of pediatric cochlear implants.

Authors:  Sigfrid D Soli; Yun Zheng
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.

Authors:  Laila M Telmesani; Nithreen M Said
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Cochlear implantation in children.

Authors:  Lee-Suk Kim; Sung-Wook Jeong; Young-Mee Lee; Jeong-Seo Kim
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 1.863

5.  Newborn hearing screening: present scenario.

Authors:  Vishwambhar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.