| Literature DB >> 30906301 |
Zhaochen Luo1,2, Yingying Li1,2, Ming Zhou1,2, Lei Lv1,2, Qiong Wu1,2, Chen Chen1,2, Yachun Zhang1,2, Baokun Sui1,2, Changchun Tu3, Min Cui1,2, Huanchun Chen1,2, Zhen F Fu1,2,4, Ling Zhao1,2.
Abstract
Rabies virus (RABV) causes fatal encephalitis in mammals and poses a public health threat in many parts of the world. Vaccination remains the most effective means for prevention and control of rabies. Studies focusing on the mechanism of RABV immunogenicity are necessary for improvement of rabies vaccines. Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), an innate receptor sensing single-stranded viral RNA, is important for the induction of innate and adaptive immunity. Our studies revealed that the absence of TLR7 led to a lower antibody production in mice immunized with RABV. It is further found that TLR7 deficiency affected the recruitment of germinal center (GC) B cells and led to lessened GCs formation. Consistently, there were less plasma cells (PCs) and antibody secreting cells (ASC) in TLR7-/- mice than those in wild type (WT) mice, resulting in impaired production of RABV-neutralizing antibodies (VNA). TLR7 deficiency also impaired the generation of memory B cells (MBCs) and the induction of secondary immune responses. Moreover, TLR7 deficiency down-regulated the induction of some cytokines/chemokines, especially IFN-γ, resulting in a Th2-biased antibody production. Overall, our results suggest that TLR7 facilitates the induction of the humoral immunity in response to RABV.Entities:
Keywords: Th1; Toll-like receptor 7; germinal center; humoral immunity; rabies virus
Year: 2019 PMID: 30906301 PMCID: PMC6418000 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1TLR7 is indispensable for optimal antibody production after RABV immunization. TLR7−/−(n = 12), TLR3−/−(n = 10), or WT mice (n = 11–12) were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU RABV vaccine strain LBNSE in the hind legs. At indicated times post immunization, sera were collected for measuring RABV-specific total IgG (A) and VNA titers (B). Error bars represent standard error of mean (SEM) (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 2TLR7 facilitates the formation of GCs. (A,B) TLR7−/− and WT mice were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU LBNSE in the hind legs. Draining LNs were excised, and tissue sections were prepared and stained for GCs (GL-7, red; B220, blue; and IgG, green). Scale bars represent 200 μm. Representative sections are shown in (A) Numbers of GCs (GL-7 positive cell clusters labeled with white arrows) in the draining LNs are calculated and shown in (B) (n = 3). (C) Blood samples were collected at indicated time points and the concentration of serum CXCL13 was determined by using a commercial ELISA kit (n = 9). Error bars represent SEM (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 3TLR7 deficiency limits GC B recruitment after RABV vaccination. TLR7−/− and WT mice were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU LBNSE in the hind legs. Draining lymph nodes were collected at the indicated times p.i. for analysis of Tfh cells (CD4+CXCR5hiPD1hi) and GC B cells (B220+GL-7+CD95+), and total 105 events were acquired to generate the graphs. (A,B) Representative flow cytometry plots (A) and corresponding calculated frequencies (B) for Tfh cells (n = 5). (C,D) Representative flow cytometry plots (C) and corresponding calculated frequencies (D) for GC B cells (n = 5–7). Error bars represent SEM (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 4TLR7 promotes the generation of PCs and ASCs. TLR7−/− and WT mice were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU LBNSE in the hind legs. (A,B) Bone marrows were collected at the indicated times p.i. Total 105 events were acquired for analysis of plasma cells (B220loCD138+) (n = 5–6). (C,D) Draining lymph nodes were collected at 7 d.p.i. for analysis of RABV-specific ASCs by ELISpot (n = 3). Representative sections are shown in (C) and numbers of ASCs are shown in (D). Error bars represent SEM (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 5TLR7 helps to maintain a long-term antibody production. TLR7−/− and WT mice were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU LBNSE. At indicated time points, sera were collected for measurement of anti-RABV neutralizing antibody till 6 months post vaccination and results were expressed as arithmetic mean (A) and geometric mean (B) of VNA titers (n = 12). At 2 months post vaccination, mice were challenged with 50LD50 of a wild type RABV strain HuNPN01 and survival ratios were recorded in (C) (n = 12). Error bars represent SEM (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 6TLR7 augments MBCs generation and promotes secondary immune responses. TLR7−/− and WT mice were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU LBNSE in the hind legs. Draining lymph nodes were collected at indicated time points. Total 105 events were acquired for quantification of MBCs (B220+CD38+CD138−). Representative flow cytometry plots (A) and corresponding calculated frequencies (B) are shown (n = 5–6). (C–E) 6 months after primary immunization, mice were boosted with 106 FFU LBNSE. Bone marrow was collected for analysis of PCs (B220loCD138+) at 14 d.p.i. (C, D) (n = 3–4). (E,F) At the indicated times after secondary immunization, blood samples were collected for measurement of VNA titers (n = 12). The arithmetic mean (E) and geometric mean (F) of VNA titers are calculated, respectively. Error bars represent SEM (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 7Gene transcription regulated by TLR7 after RABV vaccination. TLR7−/− and WT mice were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU LBNSE in the hind legs. Draining lymph nodes were collected at 7 d.p.i and the total RNA was isolated for RNA-seq. (A) After RNA-seq analysis, the representative differential genes are listed. (B) The transcriptional levels of selected differential genes were confirmed by qRT-PCR (n = 6–10). Error bars represent SEM (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 8TLR7 facilitates Th1-biased immune responses after RABV vaccination. TLR7−/− and WT mice were immunized i.m. with 106 FFU LBNSE in the hind legs. Spleens were collected at 7 d.p.i. and subjected to ELISpot assay to measure RABV-specific IFN-γ (A,B) and IL-4 (C,D) producing cells (n = 3 mice/ group). (E–G) Blood samples were collected at the indicated times p.i. for analysis of RABV G-specific IgG1 (E), IgG2a (F), and IgG2b (G) (n = 10). Error bars represent SEM. ND, not detectable. NS, no significantly difference (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001).