Literature DB >> 30906123

Results of a fast-track knee arthroplasty according to the experience of a multidisciplinary team.

Oriol Pujol1, Borja García1, Teresa Faura1, Montse Nuevo1, Francisco Maculé1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fast-Track is a multidisciplinary system that has changed the perception of total knee arthroplasty surgery. It's based on the education of the patient, an increased autonomy, adequate pain control and early mobilization. In the bibliography, there are no articles that refer to the evolution of the protocol once established, and most of them are comparatives with the previously existing conventional system. For this reason, the objective of our work is to study the evolution of the clinical results obtained through a Fast-Track system according to the experience acquired by the multidisciplinary team in this protocol.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: It's a prospective observational study. We have analyzed the results obtained in our center from its implementation in 2013 (n = 65) to the end of the study in 2016 (n = 60). We evaluated the pain at 24 and 48 h after surgery, the time until the first ambulation, the range of flexion and extension at discharge, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: The results obtained at the beginning of the implantation of the Fast-Track protocol in our center and the present ones do not present statistically significant differences. Mean pain at 24 h was 1,65/10 in 2013 and 1,5/10 in 2016, and at 48 h 1,61/10 and 1,58/10 respectively. Most of the patients in both years scored a pain below 4/10 at 24 h and 48 h. Mean time of the first ambulation was 260 min in 2013 and 254 min in 2016 (most of the patients started walking in ≤5 h). Mean flexion at discharge was 90,3° in 2013 and 87,92° in 2016 (most of the patients presented a flexion between 80 and 100°). Mean extension at discharge was 6,95° in 2013 and 8,1° in 2016 (most of the patients presented an extension between 0 and 10°). Mean length of stay was 2,46 days in 2013 and 2,43 days in 2016 (most of the patients had a stay of fewer than 4 days).
CONCLUSIONS: When applying the Fast-Track protocol by a multidisciplinary team in primary knee prosthetic surgery, the clinical results obtained are independent of the experience of this team in the protocol. So, from our experience, we can affirm that the protocol has enough solidity since its beginning and it maintains similar results despite the years of execution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experience; Fast track; Knee arthroplasty; Multidisciplinary team

Year:  2019        PMID: 30906123      PMCID: PMC6411603          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Fast-track knee arthroplasty -- status and future challenges.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Total knee arthroplasty as an overnight-stay procedure using continuous femoral nerve blocks at home: a prospective feasibility study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Peter F Gearen; F Kayser Enneking; Linda F Berry; Eugene H Spadoni; Steven Z George; Krista Vandenborne
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  The constraints on day-case total knee arthroplasty: the fastest fast track.

Authors:  E Thienpont; P Lavand'homme; H Kehlet
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Patient-reported outcome after fast-track knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kristian Larsen; Torben B Hansen; Kjeld Søballe; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  No difference between wound closure in extension or flexion for range of motion following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mahdi Motififard; Mohsen Heidari; Amin Nemati
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The role of pain for early rehabilitation in fast track total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bente Holm; Morten Tange Kristensen; Lis Myhrmann; Henrik Husted; Lasse Østergaard Andersen; Billy Kristensen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Henrik Husted; Troels H Lunn; Anders Troelsen; Lissi Gaarn-Larsen; Billy B Kristensen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Risk of re-admission, reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of total hip and knee arthroplasty in fast-track departments in Denmark from 2005 to 2011.

Authors:  Eva N Glassou; Alma B Pedersen; Torben B Hansen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  1-year follow-up of 920 hip and knee arthroplasty patients after implementing fast-track.

Authors:  Siri B Winther; Olav A Foss; Tina S Wik; Shawn P Davis; Monika Engdal; Vigleik Jessen; Otto S Husby
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of high-quality nursing on orthopedic trauma based on a fast-track surgery model.

Authors:  Weihong Wang; Ping Liu; Qin Zhang; Ge Jiang; Hanjing Zheng; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of ReHub in Patients Who Underwent Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Montse Nuevo; Hadis Mahdavi; Daniel Rodríguez; Teresa Faura; Núria Fabrellas; Simone Balocco; Marco Conti; Alessandro Castagna; Salvi Prat
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2021-04-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.