| Literature DB >> 30906000 |
Ziaul Hoda Shaan1, Sohail Ahmad1, Latif Zafar Jilani1, Naiyer Asif1, Mohd Faizan1, Mohd Zahid1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is seen in all races, age groups, and ethnic backgrounds. VDD estimated to affect >1 billion people worldwide. The purpose of the present study is to characterize the extent of Vitamin D inadequacy and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels among patients presenting to us for fracture management.Entities:
Keywords: Fracture; Vitamin D deficiency; hyperparathyroidism; prevalence rate
Year: 2019 PMID: 30906000 PMCID: PMC6394175 DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_25_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251
Figure 1Number of case and controls included in the study (male and female separately)
Figure 2Distribution of fractures among cases included in the study
Figure 3The bar graph shows the mean values of serum Vitamin D and serum parathyroid hormone of the case and controls (males and females separately)
Differences in base line characteristics between males and females
| Base line characteristics | Male | Females |
|---|---|---|
| Total number of cases | 60 | 42 |
| Total number of controls | 51 | 49 |
| Mean age of cases | 60.1±13.69 | 61.64±13.07 |
| Mean age of controls | 56.6±9.13 | 56.5±11.2 |
| Mean Vitamin D of cases (ng/mL) | 17.05±5.39 | 14.03±4.54 |
| Mean Vitamin D of controls (ng/mL) | 26.16±4.26 | 24.14±3.09 |
| Mean serum PTH of cases (pg/mL) | 91.88±5.82 | 90.13±6.16 |
| Mean serum PTH of controls (pg/mL) | 22.3±3.48 | 24.65±3.73 |
PTH=Parathyroid hormone
Values of baseline variables based on age distribution
| Variables | 45-60 years | 61-70 years | >70 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of females cases | 22 | 9 | 11 |
| Number of male cases | 35 | 10 | 15 |
| Number of female controls | 34 | 8 | 6 |
| Number of male controls | 28 | 12 | 9 |
| Mean serum Vitamin D of male cases (ng/mL) | 19.5 | 13.8 | 12.9 |
| Mean serum Vitamin D of female cases (ng/mL) | 17.25 | 10.2 | 10.7 |
| Mean serum PTH of male cases (pg/mL) | 93.29 | 87.13 | 95.14 |
| Mean serum PTH of female case (pg/mL) | 89.44 | 88.36 | 92.93 |
| Mean serum Vitamin D of male controls (ng/mL) | 28.1 | 22.4 | 20.2 |
| Mean serum Vitamin D of female controls (ng/mL) | 25.5 | 24.7 | 22.9 |
| Mean serum PTH of male controls (pg/mL) | 21.8 | 26.1 | 28.6 |
| Mean serum PTH of female controls (pg/mL) | 23.6 | 26.1 | 28.6 |
PTH=Parathyroid hormone
Residential status of cases and controls and their serum Vitamin D levels
| Residential status | Sex | Vitamin D levels (ng/dL) |
|---|---|---|
| Rural | ||
| Number of cases (56) | Male | 17.2 |
| Female | 15.9 | |
| Number of controls (15) | Male | 25.6 |
| Female | 23.4 | |
| Urban | ||
| Number of cases (46) | Male | 15.8 |
| Female | 12.4 | |
| Number of controls (85) | Male | 24.3 |
| Female | 22.6 | |
Figure 4Pyramid graph showing sex-wise number of cases in respective Vitamin D ranges
Figure 5The pyramid graph shows the age-wise mean S Vitamin D level of male and female cases
Figure 6Comparison of serum Vitamin D levels between cases and controls
Figure 7Comparison of serum parathyroid hormone levels between cases and controls
Base line characteristics and the distribution of cases and controls
| Baseline characteristics | Number of cases | Number of controls |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| 45-60 | 57 | 69 |
| 61-70 | 18 | 20 |
| >70 | 26 | 11 |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 60 | 49 |
| Female | 42 | 51 |
| Residential status | ||
| Rural | 56 | 15 |
| Urban | 46 | 85 |
| Menopausal status | ||
| Premenopause | 8 | 10 |
| Postmenopause | 34 | 41 |
| Exposure to sunlight | ||
| >15 min daily | 85 | 70 |
| ≤15 min daily | 17 | 30 |
| Serum Vitamin D | ||
| Sufficient (>30 ng/dL) | 6 | 28 |
| Insufficient (10-30 ng/dL) | 80 | 72 |
| Deficient (<10 ng/dL) | 16 | 0 |
| Serum PTH | ||
| Hypoparathyroid (<10 pg/dL) | 0 | 0 |
| Normoparathyroid (10-65 pg/dL) | 34 | 75 |
| Hyperparathyroid (>65 pg/dL) | 68 | 20 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.8±3.6 | 24.3±3.1 |
BMI=Body mass index, PTH=Parathyroid hormone