Literature DB >> 30905730

Why Smart Oncology Clinicians do Dumb Things: A Review of Cognitive Bias in Radiation Oncology.

Suzanne B Evans1, Daylian Cain2, Ajay Kapur3, Derek Brown4, Todd Pawlicki4.   

Abstract

This review will discuss the (perhaps biased) way in which smart oncologists think, biases they can identify, and potential strategies to minimize the impact of bias. It is critical to understand cognitive bias as a significant risk (recognized by the Joint Commission) associated with patient safety, and cognitive bias has been implicated in major radiotherapy incidents. The way in which we think are reviewed, covering both System 1 and system 2 processes of thinking, as well as behavioral economics concepts (prospect theory, expected utility theory). Predisposing factors to cognitive error are explained, with exploration of the groupings of person factors, patient factors, and system factors which can influence the quality of our decision-making. Other factors found to influence decision making are also discussed (rudeness, repeated decision making, hunger, personal attitudes). The review goes on to discuss cognitive bias in the clinic and in workplace interactions (including recruitment), with practical examples provided of each bias. Finally, the review covers strategies to combat cognitive bias, including summarize aloud, crowd wisdom, prospective hindsight, and joint evaluation. More definitive ways to mitigate bias are desirable.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30905730     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  2 in total

Review 1.  A review of patient questions from physicist-patient consults.

Authors:  Todd F Atwood; Derek W Brown; Titania Juang; Kevin L Moore; Kristen A McConnell; Jennifer M Steers; James D Murphy; Arno J Mundt; Todd Pawlicki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Peer review in radiation oncology is more effective today than 20 years ago.

Authors:  Anis Ahmad; Lakshmi Santanam; Abhishek A Solanki; Laura Padilla; Erina Vlashi; Patrizia Guerrieri; Michael M Dominello; Jay Burmeister; Michael C Joiner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.243

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.