Literature DB >> 30904243

Annual hospital volume of surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in relation to prognosis.

Eivind Gottlieb-Vedi1, Fredrik Mattsson2, Pernilla Lagergren3, Jesper Lagergren4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies examining hospital volume for surgery for various gastrointestinal (GI) cancer types have shown conflicting results regarding the influence on long-term prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine annual hospital volume in relation to long-term survival after elective surgery for all GI cancers (esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, bile ducts, small bowel, colon, and rectum).
METHODS: Population-based cohort study including all 45,908 patients who underwent elective surgery for GI cancers in Sweden in 2005-2013. Follow-up was until 2016 for disease-specific 5-year mortality (main outcome) and 2018 for all-cause 5-year mortality (secondary outcome). Hospitals were divided into quartiles for each GI cancer according to a 4-year average annual volume of the year of surgery and three years earlier. Multivariable Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for relevant confounders.
RESULTS: Higher hospital volume was associated with a survival benefit in the large group of patients (n = 26,688) who underwent colon cancer resection, with HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.96) for disease-specific 5-year mortality comparing the highest with the lowest quartile. Higher hospital volume improved 5-year mortality in sub-groups of patients who underwent surgery for cancer of the esophagus, pancreas, and rectum. No such improvements were found for cancer of the stomach, liver, bile ducts, or small bowel.
CONCLUSION: Long-term survival was improved at higher volume hospitals for some GI cancers (colon, esophagus, pancreas, rectum), but not for others (stomach, liver, bile ducts, small bowel).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mortality; Neoplasm; Operation; Resection; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30904243     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

1.  Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe: an Update.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Linn S Nymo; Kristoffer Lassen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The Influence of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Nasopharyngeal, Sinonasal, and Skull-Base Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stephanie Flukes; Rahul K Sharma; Shivangi Lohia; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 3.  Associations of Annual Hospital and Surgeon Volume with Patient Outcomes After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiafu Ji; Leiyu Shi; Xiangji Ying; Xinpu Lu; Fei Shan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Development and external validation of a prediction model for overall survival after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ali Belkouz; Stijn Van Roessel; Marin Strijker; Jacob L van Dam; Lois Daamen; Lydia G van der Geest; Alberto Balduzzi; Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra; Susan van Dieren; Quintus Molenaar; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Joanne Verheij; Elizabeth Van Eycken; Giuseppe Malleo; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Martijn G H van Oijen; Ivan Borbath; Chris Verslype; Cornelis J A Punt; Marc G Besselink; Heinz-Josef Klümpen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  Cohort profile: gastric cancer in the population-based, Finnish National Esophago-Gastric Cancer Cohort (FINEGO) Study.

Authors:  Joonas H Kauppila; Pasi Ohtonen; Tuomo Rantanen; Tuula Tyrväinen; Vesa Toikkanen; Minna Pääaho; Antti Valtola; Jari Räsänen; Raija Kallio; Eero Sihvo; Juha Saarnio; Tuomo J Karttunen; Vesa-Matti Pohjanen; Ari Ristimäki; Simo Laine; Arto Kokkola
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.