Literature DB >> 30904189

Six Impossible Things before Breakfast: Assumptions, Models, and Belief in Molecular Dating.

Lindell Bromham1.   

Abstract

Confidence in molecular dating analyses has grown with the increasing sophistication of the methods. Some problematic cases where molecular dates disagreed with paleontological estimates appear to have been resolved with a growing agreement between molecules and fossils. But we cannot relax just yet. The growing analytical sophistication of many molecular dating methods relies on an increasingly large number of assumptions about evolutionary history and processes. Many of these assumptions are based on statistical tractability rather than being informed by improved understanding of molecular evolution, yet changing the assumptions can influence molecular dates. How can we tell if the answers we get are driven more by the assumptions we make than by the molecular data being analyzed?
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calibration; diversification rate; macroevolution; molecular dates; phylogenetics; relaxed clock; speciation rate

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30904189     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  7 in total

1.  Nucleotide Substitutions during Speciation may Explain Substitution Rate Variation.

Authors:  Thijs Janzen; Folmer Bokma; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 9.160

Review 2.  Why Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum are so different? A tale of two clades and their species diversities.

Authors:  Ananias A Escalante; Axl S Cepeda; M Andreína Pacheco
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Phylogenomics indicates the "living fossil" Isoetes diversified in the Cenozoic.

Authors:  Daniel Wood; Guillaume Besnard; David J Beerling; Colin P Osborne; Pascal-Antoine Christin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Quantifying the Error of Secondary vs. Distant Primary Calibrations in a Simulated Environment.

Authors:  Christopher Lowell Edward Powell; Sydney Waskin; Fabia Ursula Battistuzzi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Evolutionary Models for the Diversification of Placental Mammals Across the KPg Boundary.

Authors:  Mark S Springer; Nicole M Foley; Peggy L Brady; John Gatesy; William J Murphy
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Large-Scale Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal the Monophyly of Bryophytes and Neoproterozoic Origin of Land Plants.

Authors:  Danyan Su; Lingxiao Yang; Xuan Shi; Xiaoya Ma; Xiaofan Zhou; S Blair Hedges; Bojian Zhong
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Data-driven speciation tree prior for better species divergence times in calibration-poor molecular phylogenies.

Authors:  Qiqing Tao; Jose Barba-Montoya; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.937

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.