Oliver K Jawitz1, Mohamed A Adam2, Megan C Turner3, Brian F Gilmore3, John Migaly3. 1. Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC. Electronic address: oliver.jawitz@duke.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite clinical guidelines classifying T2 rectal cancer as a contraindication for transanal local excision attributable to unacceptably high rates of local recurrence, it is a practice that persists clinically. Recent clinical trials have suggested that transanal local excision in addition to neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an acceptable alternative in select patients. METHODS: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage T2N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical intervention. Patients were stratified by treatment with transabdominal resection or transanal local excision, both with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Propensity matching was performed, and, using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models, survival was compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 12,021 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1,761 and 6,629 patients who underwent transabdominal resection with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, respectively, and 695 and 2,936 patients who underwent local transanal excision with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, respectively. In unadjusted analysis, patients undergoing induction therapy followed by transabdominal resection or local excision had equivalent survival. Similarly, on multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression after propensity matching, local excision was not an independent predictor of patient mortality compared with transabdominal resection (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.75-1.16). CONCLUSION: Local transanal excision in addition to neoadjuvant chemoradiation may provide comparable survival benefit to transabdominal resection for patients with clinical stage T2N0M0 rectal cancer. Therefore, patients who refuse or are poor candidates for transabdominal resection should be considered for neoadjuvant therapy followed by transanal local excision.
BACKGROUND: Despite clinical guidelines classifying T2 rectal cancer as a contraindication for transanal local excision attributable to unacceptably high rates of local recurrence, it is a practice that persists clinically. Recent clinical trials have suggested that transanal local excision in addition to neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an acceptable alternative in select patients. METHODS: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage T2N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical intervention. Patients were stratified by treatment with transabdominal resection or transanal local excision, both with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Propensity matching was performed, and, using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models, survival was compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 12,021 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1,761 and 6,629 patients who underwent transabdominal resection with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, respectively, and 695 and 2,936 patients who underwent local transanal excision with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, respectively. In unadjusted analysis, patients undergoing induction therapy followed by transabdominal resection or local excision had equivalent survival. Similarly, on multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression after propensity matching, local excision was not an independent predictor of patientmortality compared with transabdominal resection (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.75-1.16). CONCLUSION: Local transanal excision in addition to neoadjuvant chemoradiation may provide comparable survival benefit to transabdominal resection for patients with clinical stage T2N0M0 rectal cancer. Therefore, patients who refuse or are poor candidates for transabdominal resection should be considered for neoadjuvant therapy followed by transanal local excision.
Authors: Daniel J Boffa; Joshua E Rosen; Katherine Mallin; Ashley Loomis; Greer Gay; Bryan Palis; Kathleen Thoburn; Donna Gress; Daniel P McKellar; Lawrence N Shulman; Matthew A Facktor; David P Winchester Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: D Gopaul; P Belliveau; T Vuong; J Trudel; C A Vasilevsky; R Corns; Philip H Gordon Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Krzysztof Bujko; Piotr Richter; Fraser M Smith; Wojciech Polkowski; Marek Szczepkowski; Andrzej Rutkowski; Adam Dziki; Lucyna Pietrzak; Milena Kołodziejczyk; Jerzy Kuśnierz; Tomasz Gach; Jan Kulig; Grzegorz Nawrocki; Jakub Radziszewski; Ryszard Wierzbicki; Teresa Kowalska; Wiktor Meissner; Andrzej Radkowski; Krzysztof Paprota; Marcin Polkowski; Anna Rychter Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Lynette Cederquist; Yi-Jen Chen; Kristen K Ciombor; Stacey Cohen; Harry S Cooper; Dustin Deming; Paul F Engstrom; Jean L Grem; Axel Grothey; Howard S Hochster; Sarah Hoffe; Steven Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Natalie Kirilcuk; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Wells A Messersmith; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Mary F Mulcahy; James D Murphy; Steven Nurkin; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Evan Wuthrick; Kristina M Gregory; Lisa Gurski; Deborah A Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Y Nancy You; Robert E Roses; George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Barry W Feig; Rebecca Slack; Sa Nguyen; John M Skibber Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Lindsay A Renfro; Oliver S Chow; Qian Shi; Xiomara W Carrero; Patricio B Lynn; Charles R Thomas; Emily Chan; Peter A Cataldo; Jorge E Marcet; David S Medich; Craig S Johnson; Samuel C Oommen; Bruce G Wolff; Alessio Pigazzi; Shane M McNevin; Roger K Pons; Ronald Bleday Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jae Myoung Noh; Won Park; Jae-Sung Kim; Woong Sub Koom; Jin Hee Kim; Doo Ho Choi; Hee Chul Park Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Praveen D Chatani; Dana A Dominguez; John G Aversa; Jeremy L Davis; Jonathan M Hernandez; Lily L Lai; Andrew M Blakely Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Patricio B Lynn; Maxime Van der Valk; Yvette H M Claassen; Qian Shi; Maria Widmar; Ester Bastiaannet; Cornelis Van de Velde; Julio Garcia-Aguilar Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 12.969