Literature DB >> 30903683

Experience of chromosomal microarray applied in prenatal and postnatal settings in Hong Kong.

Shirley S W Cheng1, Kelvin Y K Chan2, Kelphen K P Leung1, Patrick K C Au2, Wai-Keung Tam2, Samuel K M Li2, Ho-Ming Luk1, Anita S Y Kan3, Brian H Y Chung4,5, Ivan F M Lo1, Mary H Y Tang4.   

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is recommended as a first tier investigation for patients with developmental delay (DD), intellectual disability (ID), autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). It is widely used in the prenatal and postnatal settings for detection of chromosomal aberrations. This is a retrospective review of all array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH/ array CGH) findings ascertained in two major prenatal and postnatal genetic diagnostic centers in Hong Kong from June 2012 to December 2017. Medical records were reviewed for cases with pathogenic and variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS). Classification of copy number variants (CNVs) was based on current knowledge and experience by August 2018. The aims of this review are to study the diagnostic yield of array CGH application in prenatal and postnatal settings in Hong Kong and to describe the spectrum of abnormalities found. Prenatal indications included abnormal ultrasound findings, positive Down syndrome screening, abnormal noninvasive prenatal test results, advanced maternal age and family history of chromosomal or genetic abnormalities. Postnatal indications included unexplained DD, ID, ASD, and MCA. A total of 1,261 prenatal subjects and 3,096 postnatal patients were reviewed. The prenatal diagnostic yield of pathogenic CNV and VUS (excluding those detectable by karyotype) was 3.5%. The postnatal diagnostic yield of pathogenic CNV was 15.2%. The detection rates for well-defined microdeletion and microduplication syndromes were 4.6% in prenatal and 6.1% (1 in 16 index patients) in postnatal cases, respectively. Chromosomes 15, 16, and 22 accounted for over 21 and 25% of pathogenic CNVs detected in prenatal and postnatal cohorts, respectively. This review provides the first large scale overview of genomic imbalance of mostly Chinese patients in prenatal and postnatal settings.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese; autism; chromosomal microarray; developmental delay; prenatal test

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30903683     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  12 in total

1.  Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Kandamurugu Manickam; Monica R McClain; Laurie A Demmer; Sawona Biswas; Hutton M Kearney; Jennifer Malinowski; Lauren J Massingham; Danny Miller; Timothy W Yu; Fuki M Hisama
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  CNV profiles of Chinese pediatric patients with developmental disorders.

Authors:  Haiming Yuan; Shaofang Shangguan; Zhengchang Li; Jingsi Luo; Jiasun Su; Ruen Yao; Shun Zhang; Chen Liang; Qian Chen; Zhijie Gao; Yanli Zhu; Shujie Zhang; Wei Li; Weiliang Lu; Yu Zhang; Hua Xie; Fang Liu; Qingming Wang; Yangyang Lin; Liying Liu; Xiuming Wang; Liyang Liang; Jianmin Zhong; Haibo Li; Haiyan Qiu; Huifeng Zhang; Mei Yan; Maimaiti Mireguli; Yanhui Liu; Dan Zhang; Hongying Wang; Haitao Lv; Bobo Xie; Chunrong Gui; Xiaodai Cui; Liping Zou; Jian Wang; James F Gusella; Yiping Shen; Xiaoli Chen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Exome sequencing reveals predominantly de novo variants in disorders with intellectual disability (ID) in the founder population of Finland.

Authors:  Irma Järvelä; Tuomo Määttä; Anushree Acharya; Juha Leppälä; Shalini N Jhangiani; Maria Arvio; Auli Siren; Minna Kankuri-Tammilehto; Hannaleena Kokkonen; Maarit Palomäki; Teppo Varilo; Mary Fang; Trevor D Hadley; Angad Jolly; Tarja Linnankivi; Ritva Paetau; Anni Saarela; Reetta Kälviäinen; Jan Olme; Liz M Nouel-Saied; Diana M Cornejo-Sanchez; Lorida Llaci; James R Lupski; Jennifer E Posey; Suzanne M Leal; Isabelle Schrauwen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Submicroscopic aberrations of chromosome 16 in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wu; Liangpu Xu; Ying Li; Na Lin; Linjuan Su; Meiying Cai; Xiaorui Xie; Lin Zheng; Hailong Huang; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Chromosomal Aberrations in Pediatric Patients with Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability: A Single-Center Clinical Investigation.

Authors:  Ting Hu; Zhu Zhang; Jiamin Wang; Qinqin Li; Hongmei Zhu; Yi Lai; He Wang; Shanling Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Chromosomal microarray analysis for pregnancies with or without ultrasound abnormalities in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Wu; Gang An; Xiaorui Xie; Linjuan Su; Meiying Cai; Xuemei Chen; Ying Li; Na Lin; Deqin He; Meiying Wang; Hailong Huang; Liangpu Xu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  False-positives and false-negatives in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what can we learn from a meta-analyses on > 750,000 tests?

Authors:  Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Prenatal Diagnosis by Chromosome Microarray Analysis, An Indian Experience.

Authors:  Meena Bajaj Lall; Shruti Agarwal; Preeti Paliwal; Pushpa Saviour; Anju Joshi; Arti Joshi; Surbhi Mahajan; Sunita Bijarnia-Mahay; Ratna Dua Puri; I C Verma
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-01-19

Review 9.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23

10.  Systematic evidence-based review: outcomes from exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability.

Authors:  Jennifer Malinowski; David T Miller; Scott E Hickey; Jun Shen; Laurie Demmer; Jennifer Gannon; Elaine Maria Pereira; Molly C Schroeder; Maren T Scheuner; Anne Chun-Hui Tsai
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.