Literature DB >> 30903611

Impact of calcifications on diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Anoop K Koshy1, Rao B Harshavardhan1, Ismail Siyad1, Rama P Venu2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic calcific pancreatitis (CCP) is a major risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and is common in southern India. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful for tissue acquisition in patients with solid pancreatic lesions. Multiple factors may affect the diagnostic yield of FNA samples. The present study was performed to assess the impact of pancreatic calcifications on the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA in PDAC.
METHODS: All patients with confirmed PDAC from January 2013 to December 2017 were included. CCP was diagnosed based on typical imaging characteristics with or without evidence of pancreatic insufficiency along with surgical histopathology reports showing features of chronic pancreatitis. The diagnostic yield and adequacy of cellularity were  assessed by a pathologist who was blinded and were compared between the two groups: group 1: PDAC patients with no evidence of CCP and, group 2: PDAC patients with CCP.
RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included in the study. The diagnostic yield was lower in patients in group 2 (n = 42, 25 [59.52%]) as compared to those in group 1 (n = 80, 63 [78.75%]) (p-value = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, only the presence of calcifications was found to have an independent association with diagnostic yield (odds ratio 3.83 [95% confidence interval 1.22-11.9]).
CONCLUSIONS: CCP had a significant impact on the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Novel techniques and newer technology that may mitigate the negative effect of calcification on diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA in patients with CCP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic calcific pancreatitis; Diagnosis; Endoscopic ultrasound; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30903611     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-019-00941-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  27 in total

Review 1.  EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos).

Authors:  Sachin Wani; V Raman Muthusamy; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities.

Authors:  Keith E Volmar; Robin T Vollmer; Paul S Jowell; Rendon C Nelson; H Bill Xie
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  Ali A Siddiqui; Lauren J Brown; Shih-Kuang S Hong; Rossitza A Draganova-Tacheva; Jason Korenblit; David E Loren; Thomas E Kowalski; Charalambos Solomides
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Lee; John Stewart; William A Ross; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Lianchun Xiao; Gregg Staerkel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments.

Authors:  B Etemad; D C Whitcomb
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Matthew L Bechtold; James L Buxbaum; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Hébert-Magee; S Bae; S Varadarajulu; J Ramesh; A R Frost; M A Eloubeidi; I A Eltoum
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.073

9.  Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Qian Chen; Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Yaqi Duan; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration by capillary action, suction, and no suction methods: a randomized blinded study.

Authors:  Rinkesh K Bansal; Narendra S Choudhary; Rajesh Puri; Saurabh K Patle; Suraj Bhagat; Mukesh Nasa; Amit Bhasin; Haimanti Sarin; Mridula Guleria; Randhir Sud
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.