Literature DB >> 30903315

Comparison of clinical outcomes of two different types of paclitaxel-coated balloons for treatment of patients with coronary in-stent restenosis.

Viet Phuong Thuy Nguyen1, Choongki Kim2, Sung-Jin Hong2, Chul-Min Ahn2,3, Jung-Sun Kim2,3, Byeong-Keuk Kim2,3, Young-Guk Ko2,3, Donghoon Choi2,3, Yangsoo Jang2,3, Myeong-Ki Hong4,5.   

Abstract

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been shown to be a promising option for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with ISR who were treated with two commonly used paclitaxel-containing DCBs, the Pantera Lux (PL) and SeQuent Please (SP). A total of 491 patients with 507 ISR lesions [PL-DCB in 127 (26%) patients and SP-DCB in 364 (74%) patients] underwent DCB angioplasty for ISR lesions. The major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, were assessed. There were no significant differences in each occurrence of MACE and cardiac death: 16 MACEs (61 per 1000 person-years) in the PL-DCB group and 55 (60 per 1000 person-years) MACEs in the SP-DCB group, log-rank p = 0.895, and three cardiac deaths (11 per 1000 person-years) in the PL-DCB group and ten cardiac deaths (11 per 1000 person-years) in the SP-DCB group, log-rank p = 0.849. Diabetes mellitus under insulin treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 2.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-5.60; p = 0.007], chronic kidney disease (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.01-3.92; p = 0.045), early-onset ISR (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.18-3.36; p = 0.010), and recurrent ISR (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.08-3.32; p = 0.026) were associated with the occurrence of MACE after DCB angioplasty. There was no significant difference of MACE between PL-DCB and SP-DCB treatment in patients with ISR. Patients with insulin-treated diabetes, chronic kidney disease, early-onset ISR, and recurrent ISR were at a higher risk of MACE after DCB angioplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Drug-coated balloon; In-stent restenosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30903315     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01388-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  2 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory perspectives of combination products.

Authors:  Jiaxin Tian; Xu Song; Yongqing Wang; Maobo Cheng; Shuang Lu; Wei Xu; Guobiao Gao; Lei Sun; Zhonglan Tang; Minghui Wang; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-09-07

2.  Cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting balloons in chronic kidney disease: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Michael Jonas; Maayan Kagan; Gal Sella; Dan Haberman; Gil Chernin
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.388

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.