Frederick A Matsen1, Anastasia Whitson2, Sarah E Jackins3, Jason E Hsu2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356500, Seattle, WA, 98195-6500, USA. matsen@uw.edu. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356500, Seattle, WA, 98195-6500, USA. 3. Department of Rehabilitation, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 354745, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been documented that the smooth and move procedure-smoothing the proximal humeral surface while maintaining the coracoacromial arch-can provide clinically significant long-term improvement in function for patients having irreparable rotator cuff tears with retained active elevation. This study sought to demonstrate that clinically significant gains in comfort, function, and active motion can be realized as early as 6 weeks after this procedure. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of the 6-week clinical outcomes for 48 patients enrolled prior to a smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Prior rotator cuff repair had been attempted in 28 (70%). RESULTS: In 40 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative measurements, the Simple Shoulder Test scores improved from an average of 3.4 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 5.7 ± 3.5 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), an improvement that exceeded the published values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The clinical outcomes were not worse for the 18 shoulders with irreparable tears of both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. In 30 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative objective measurements of active motion, the average abduction improved from 93(± 43) to 123(± 47)° (p = 0.005) and the average flexion improved from 102(± 46) to 126(± 44)° (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously documented long-term effectiveness for shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears and retained active elevation, this study demonstrates that the smooth and move procedure provides clinically significant improvement as early as 6 weeks after surgery.
BACKGROUND: It has been documented that the smooth and move procedure-smoothing the proximal humeral surface while maintaining the coracoacromial arch-can provide clinically significant long-term improvement in function for patients having irreparable rotator cuff tears with retained active elevation. This study sought to demonstrate that clinically significant gains in comfort, function, and active motion can be realized as early as 6 weeks after this procedure. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of the 6-week clinical outcomes for 48 patients enrolled prior to a smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Prior rotator cuff repair had been attempted in 28 (70%). RESULTS: In 40 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative measurements, the Simple Shoulder Test scores improved from an average of 3.4 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 5.7 ± 3.5 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), an improvement that exceeded the published values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The clinical outcomes were not worse for the 18 shoulders with irreparable tears of both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. In 30 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative objective measurements of active motion, the average abduction improved from 93(± 43) to 123(± 47)° (p = 0.005) and the average flexion improved from 102(± 46) to 126(± 44)° (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously documented long-term effectiveness for shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears and retained active elevation, this study demonstrates that the smooth and move procedure provides clinically significant improvement as early as 6 weeks after surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
Active abduction; Active flexion; Clinical outcomes; Irreparable rotator cuff tear; Smooth and move procedure
Authors: Jason E Hsu; David Andrew Hulet; Chris McDonald; Anastasia Whitson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Jean Kany; Jean Grimberg; Rajkumar S Amaravathi; Padmanaban Sekaran; Dan Scorpie; Jean David Werthel Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: William T Pennington; Brian A Bartz; Joann M Pauli; Carol E Walker; William Schmidt Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Warren R Dunn; John E Kuhn; Rosemary Sanders; Qi An; Keith M Baumgarten; Julie Y Bishop; Robert H Brophy; James L Carey; G Brian Holloway; Grant L Jones; C Benjamin Ma; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Sourav K Poddar; Matthew V Smith; Edwin E Spencer; Armando F Vidal; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; Miguel Cuadros-Romero; Paul Bennett; Steven McPhail; Graham K Kerr; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Jaime Martin-Martin Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 2.362